Science Explorer Interactive view Map
Institution · Austin · United States

Texas Historical Commission

Research works
79
▼ 42% vs 2013–17
Citations
553
7.0 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
0.0%
record average 16.5%
Open access
25%
world 28%

Not ranked overall: Texas Historical Commission is under the volume floor below which an excellence rate is noise. Not ranked is not the same as ranked last.

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

Agricultural and Biological Sciences: 2.70× its world share, 0 worksAgricultural and Bio…Computer Science: 1.10× its world share, 0 worksComputer ScienceEarth and Planetary Sciences: 7.63× its world share, 0 worksEarth and Planetary …Environmental Science: 2.41× its world share, 0 worksEnvironmental ScienceMedicine: 0.67× its world share, 0 worksMedicineArts and Humanities: 1.48× its world share, 0 worksArts and HumanitiesSocial Sciences: 2.97× its world share, 1 worksSocial Sciencesworld share
more than its size predictsabout as predictedless

Rings at 0.5×, and 2×. Widest outward: Earth and Planetary Sciences, 7.6×. Every wedge is a field page.

Who are the top researchers at Texas Historical Commission?

Ranked on the composite score, J. Barto Arnold lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Texas Historical Commission.

  1. 1 J. Barto Arnold United States · #280,639 worldwide 18 citations · 24 works
All ranked researchers at Texas Historical Commission

Which keywords describe research at Texas Historical Commission?

By fractional works in all years, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Holocene, Maritime Archaeology, Mediterranean, Cultural Heritage, Community Resilience, Traditional Irrigation, Water Sustainability and Conservation.

▲ more of its work than of the world’s◆ about the world’s share▼ less than the world’s

Size is fractional works in all years in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.

All 40 words, with their numbers
  1. Holocene17▲ 131×2 topics
  2. Maritime Archaeology16▲ 937×1 topic
  3. Mediterranean16▲ 193×1 topic
  4. Cultural Heritage15▲ 44×6 topics
  5. Community Resilience10▲ 118×3 topics
  6. Traditional Irrigation10▲ 998×1 topic
  7. Water Sustainability10▲ 998×1 topic
  8. Conservation6▲ 17×5 topics
  9. Climate Change6▲ 2.8×9 topics
  10. Antioxidant5▲ 10×2 topics
  11. Sustainability5▲ 3.8×5 topics
  12. Biogeography4▲ 17×2 topics
  13. Medicinal Plants4▲ 15×2 topics
  14. Cyperus4▲ 268×1 topic
  15. Phylogeny4▲ 29×1 topic
  16. Remote Sensing3▲ 3.7×5 topics
  17. Public Policy3▲ 8.9×2 topics
  18. Archaeology3▲ 24×3 topics
  19. Cultural Identity3▲ 8.4×2 topics
  20. Environmental Movement3▲ 174×1 topic
  21. Gender3▲ 6.0×6 topics
  22. Renewable Energy3▲ 3.4×1 topic
  23. Satellite Imagery3▲ 35×2 topics
  24. Agricultural Origins2▲ 89×1 topic
  25. Radiocarbon Dating2▲ 89×1 topic
  26. Aerial Survey2▲ 184×1 topic
  27. Biodiversity2▲ 4.0×4 topics
  28. LiDAR2▲ 82×1 topic
  29. Identity2▲ 3.8×3 topics
  30. Culture2▲ 5.8×3 topics
  31. Intersectionality2▲ 18×2 topics
  32. Migration2▲ 8.8×2 topics
  33. Race2▲ 21×2 topics
  34. African Diaspora2▲ 60×1 topic
  35. Black Feminist Theory2▲ 276×1 topic
  36. Chicano2▲ 161×1 topic
  37. Latino2▲ 161×1 topic
  38. System Dynamics2▲ 29×2 topics
  39. Water Resources2▲ 8.9×2 topics
  40. Ecosystem2▲ 13×1 topic

Which research topics does Texas Historical Commission publish most on?

By volume in 2022–2025: Botany and Geology in Latin America and Caribbean, Historical and Cultural Archaeology Studies, Geographic Information Systems Studies and Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques.

  1. 1 Botany and Geology in Latin America and Caribbean Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 0 works
  2. 2 Historical and Cultural Archaeology Studies Anthropology 0 works
  3. 3 Geographic Information Systems Studies Geography, Planning and Development 0 works
  4. 4 Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 0 works
  5. 5 Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications Environmental Engineering 0 works
  6. 6 Archaeology and Rock Art Studies Archeology 0 works
  7. 7 Archaeology and ancient environmental studies Paleontology 0 works
  8. 8 Trauma, Hemostasis, Coagulopathy, Resuscitation Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 0 works
  9. 9 Critical Realism in Sociology Sociology and Political Science 0 works
  10. 10 Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment Epidemiology 0 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available25.2%not open74.8%

World: 28% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors9.4%domestic only90.6%

World: 19% is written across borders.

How has Texas Historical Commission's research output changed?

Output in 2018–2022 was 42% lower than in 2013–2017.

1990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Other research institutions in Austin

All research institutions in Austin

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.