Science Explorer Interactive view Map
Nonprofit · New York · ??

The Human Diagnosis Project

Research works
6
▼ 64% vs 2013–17
Citations
272
43.9 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
60.0%
record average 16.5%
Open access
38%
world 28%

Not ranked overall: The Human Diagnosis Project is under the volume floor below which an excellence rate is noise. Not ranked is not the same as ranked last.

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

Which research topics does The Human Diagnosis Project publish most on?

By volume in 2022–2025: Child Abuse and Trauma, Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation, Pediatric Pain Management Techniques and Topic Modeling.

  1. 1 Child Abuse and Trauma Clinical Psychology 0 works
  2. 2 Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation Pharmacology 0 works
  3. 3 Pediatric Pain Management Techniques Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 0 works
  4. 4 Topic Modeling Artificial Intelligence 0 works
  5. 5 Machine Learning in Healthcare Artificial Intelligence 0 works
  6. 6 Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education Health Informatics 0 works
  7. 7 Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills Family Practice 0 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available38.2%not open61.8%

World: 28% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors88.6%domestic only11.4%

World: 19% is written across borders.

How has The Human Diagnosis Project's research output changed?

Output in 2018–2022 was 64% lower than in 2013–2017.

20002005201020152020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Other research institutions in New York

All research institutions in New York

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.