Science Explorer Interactive view Map

Pediatric Pain Management Techniques

Pediatric Pain Management Techniques is a research topic within Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health. Science Explorer counts 29k research works in it since 1950. 24.0% of them reached the world's top 10% most cited for their field and year.

This cluster of papers focuses on the assessment and management of pain in pediatric populations, including neonates, infants, children, and adolescents. It covers topics such as the epidemiology of chronic pain, validation of pain measurement tools, use of virtual reality for pain reduction, psychological interventions for pain and distress, impact of parental factors on pediatric pain, and the long-term consequences of early life pain experiences.

  • Pediatric Pain
  • Pain Measurement
  • Chronic Pain
  • Adolescents
  • Neonatal Pain
  • Pain Management
  • Virtual Reality Distraction
  • Psychological Interventions
  • Pain Assessment Tools
  • Family Impact
Research works
29k
fractional, since 1950
In the world top 10%
7k
per year above
Top-10% rate
24.0%
share of its works in the world top 10%
Growth, 2013–17 → 2018–22
+43%
the tick is no change

This ranks research output and citation impact. It says nothing about the quality of diagnosis, treatment or care.

Which countries lead Pediatric Pain Management Techniques research?

By volume, the United States and Türkiye publish the most (1.5k and 428 works in 2022–2025).

By volume, 2022–2025

  1. 1 United States 1.5k works
  2. 2 Türkiye 428 works
  3. 3 China 383 works
  4. 4 India 380 works
  5. 5 United Kingdom 319 works
  6. 6 Canada 299 works
  7. 7 Brazil 251 works
  8. 8 Australia 191 works
  9. 9 Germany 175 works
  10. 10 Spain 173 works

How concentrated that is

The same countries as shares of everything the list above accounts for. A node where two countries do two thirds of the work and one spread evenly across twelve read alike as a ranking and not at all alike here.

United States: 36.5%Türkiye: 10.5%China: 9.4%India: 9.3%6 others listed: 34.4%36%largest
United States1,493 · 36.5%Türkiye428 · 10.5%China383 · 9.4%India380 · 9.3%6 others listed1,408 · 34.4%

Shares of the rows listed above, not of the whole node.

Which institutions lead Pediatric Pain Management Techniques research?

By volume in 2022–2025, Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi publishes the most Pediatric Pain Management Techniques research, followed by Stanford University and University of Toronto.

Who are the leading researchers in Pediatric Pain Management Techniques?

The most-cited researchers publishing on Pediatric Pain Management Techniques include Lisa Hartling.

  1. 1 Lisa Hartling Canada 5k citations

Ranked by citations received across their whole record, among researchers with at least three works on this topic.

Where is Pediatric Pain Management Techniques research done?

The largest centres of Pediatric Pain Management Techniques research in 2022–2025 are Istanbul (Türkiye), London (United Kingdom), Toronto (Canada) and Boston (United States). Among places with at least 20 works in it, it is an unusually large share of all research in Cincinnati.

Largest cities, 2022–2025

  1. 1 Istanbul Türkiye 93 works
  2. 2 London United Kingdom 86 works
  3. 3 Toronto Canada 76 works
  4. 4 Boston United States 67 works
  5. 5 São Paulo Brazil 56 works
  6. 6 Montreal Canada 49 works
  7. 7 Ankara Türkiye 47 works
  8. 8 New York United States 46 works
  9. 9 Madrid Spain 43 works
  10. 10 Tehran Iran 42 works

Where it is the local speciality

  1. CincinnatiUS · 34.1 works7.3×
← less than its size predictsmore →

Location quotient: how much more of its research is in Pediatric Pain Management Techniques than the world average.

See Pediatric Pain Management Techniques on the map

Where is the best place to study Pediatric Pain Management Techniques?

Among universities, judged by research, Stanford University, University of Calgary and Iranshahr University score highest, combining excellence, specialisation, size, growth and international reach. Research strength is one signal when choosing where to study; it does not measure teaching.

0%20%40%mean 31.6%fractional works in this node (log) →share in the world top 10% →Stanford University: 24, 35.7%University of Calgary: 13, 45.4%Iranshahr University: 9, 35.5%Harvard University: 21, 32.3%Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi: 24, 11.6%Université de Montréal: 11, 31.3%University of Toronto: 24, 28.8%The University of Sydney: 10, 41.6%Tanta University: 10, 21.7%University of Washington: 17, 32.1%University of CalgaryStanford UniversityIranshahr UniversityHarvard University
above the meannear itbelow it

One dot per university in the table below. The upper left is the interesting corner: small places doing unusually strong work.

#UniversityScoreTop 10%SpecialisationWorksGrowth
1 Stanford UniversityUnited States 68.835.7%3.4×24 +215.0%
2 University of CalgaryCanada 67.545.4%3.5×13 +215.3%
3 Iranshahr UniversityIran 66.435.5%18.7×9 +231.3%
4 Harvard UniversityUnited States 56.332.3%2.9×21 +46.5%
5 Sağlık Bilimleri ÜniversitesiTürkiye 54.011.6%7.3×24
6 Université de MontréalCanada 53.631.3%4.5×11 +148.6%
7 University of TorontoCanada 53.528.8%2.8×24 +20.4%
8 The University of SydneyAustralia 51.441.6%1.8×10 +127.4%
9 Tanta UniversityEgypt 50.821.7%5.6×10 +208.3%
10 University of WashingtonUnited States 46.732.1%2.8×17 +17.7%

Universities only. Score blends excellence (30%), specialisation (25%), size (20%), growth (15%) and international reach (10%), 2015–2022; growth compares 2010–14 with 2015–19.

Is Pediatric Pain Management Techniques research growing?

Output in 2018–2022 was 43% higher than in 2013–2017, peaking in 2025. The fastest-growing topics are Pediatric Pain Management Techniques.

19801990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Which topics inside it are moving

Growth and decline on one axis around a shared zero. Two lists side by side hide the thing that matters: whether the growth dwarfs the decline, or the other way round.