Science Explorer Interactive view Map

Machine Learning in Healthcare

Machine Learning in Healthcare is a research topic within Artificial Intelligence. Science Explorer counts 24k research works in it since 1950. 25.0% of them reached the world's top 10% most cited for their field and year.

This cluster of papers focuses on the application of deep learning techniques in healthcare, particularly in the analysis of electronic health records (EHR). The papers cover a wide range of topics including predictive modeling, patient similarity, disease risk prediction, medical concept embedding, and temporal data analysis. The goal is to leverage deep learning to improve healthcare decision-making and enable precision medicine.

  • Deep Learning
  • Healthcare
  • Electronic Health Records
  • Predictive Modeling
  • Patient Similarity
  • Clinical Event Prediction
  • Disease Risk Prediction
  • Medical Concept Embedding
  • Temporal Data Analysis
  • Precision Medicine
Research works
24k
fractional, since 1950
In the world top 10%
5.9k
per year above
Top-10% rate
25.0%
share of its works in the world top 10%
Growth, 2013–17 → 2018–22
+283%
the tick is no change

Which countries lead Machine Learning in Healthcare research?

By volume, the United States and India publish the most (2.7k and 2k works in 2022–2025).

By volume, 2022–2025

  1. 1 United States 2.7k works
  2. 2 India 2k works
  3. 3 China 1.9k works
  4. 4 United Kingdom 550 works
  5. 5 Germany 376 works
  6. 6 Canada 286 works
  7. 7 Italy 270 works
  8. 8 Australia 235 works
  9. 9 South Korea 231 works
  10. 10 France 186 works

How concentrated that is

The same countries as shares of everything the list above accounts for. A node where two countries do two thirds of the work and one spread evenly across twelve read alike as a ranking and not at all alike here.

United States: 30.5%India: 22.9%China: 22.2%United Kingdom: 6.3%6 others listed: 18.1%31%largest
United States2,676 · 30.5%India2,006 · 22.9%China1,945 · 22.2%United Kingdom550 · 6.3%6 others listed1,585 · 18.1%

Shares of the rows listed above, not of the whole node.

Which institutions lead Machine Learning in Healthcare research?

By volume in 2022–2025, Design Intelligence (United States) publishes the most Machine Learning in Healthcare research, followed by Vellore Institute of Technology University and Chandigarh University.

Who are the leading researchers in Machine Learning in Healthcare?

The most-cited researchers publishing on Machine Learning in Healthcare include Philip S. Yu.

  1. 1 Philip S. Yu United States 6.6k citations

Ranked by citations received across their whole record, among researchers with at least three works on this topic.

Where is Machine Learning in Healthcare research done?

The largest centres of Machine Learning in Healthcare research in 2022–2025 are Beijing (China), Chennai (India), London (United Kingdom) and Shanghai (China). Among places with at least 20 works in it, it is an unusually large share of all research in Norman, Mohali and Vijayawada.

Largest cities, 2022–2025

  1. 1 Beijing China 345 works
  2. 2 Chennai India 232 works
  3. 3 London United Kingdom 186 works
  4. 4 Shanghai China 161 works
  5. 5 New York United States 141 works
  6. 6 Seoul South Korea 126 works
  7. 7 Norman United States 120 works
  8. 8 Bengaluru India 115 works
  9. 9 Boston United States 110 works
  10. 10 Dhaka Bangladesh 109 works

Where it is the local speciality

  1. NormanUS · 120.5 works30×
  2. MohaliIN · 65.0 works8.4×
  3. VijayawadaIN · 42.9 works8.0×
  4. Greater NoidaIN · 54.8 works7.5×
← less than its size predictsmore →

Location quotient: how much more of its research is in Machine Learning in Healthcare than the world average.

See Machine Learning in Healthcare on the map

Where is the best place to study Machine Learning in Healthcare?

Among universities, judged by research, Harvard University, Chandigarh University and Stanford University score highest, combining excellence, specialisation, size, growth and international reach. Research strength is one signal when choosing where to study; it does not measure teaching.

0%25%50%75%mean 33.19%fractional works in this node (log) →share in the world top 10% →Harvard University: 48, 34.6%Chandigarh University: 62, 20.7%Stanford University: 45, 34.6%Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University: 9, 62.5%Daffodil International University: 10, 29.1%Imperial College London: 28, 31.8%The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston: 18, 31.1%University of Oxford: 29, 35.4%Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai: 26, 26.9%Bennett University: 17, 25.2%Princess Nourah bint…Harvard UniversityStanford UniversityChandigarh University
above the meannear itbelow it

One dot per university in the table below. The upper left is the interesting corner: small places doing unusually strong work.

#UniversityScoreTop 10%SpecialisationWorksGrowth
1 Harvard UniversityUnited States 57.534.6%3.4×48 +231.5%
2 Chandigarh UniversityIndia 57.420.7%9.7×62
3 Stanford UniversityUnited States 55.234.6%3.2×45 +439.6%
4 Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman UniversitySaudi Arabia 53.862.5%3.0×9
5 Daffodil International UniversityBangladesh 52.029.1%9.7×10
6 Imperial College LondonUnited Kingdom 51.831.8%2.7×28 +253.6%
7 The University of Texas Health Science Center at HoustonUnited States 51.431.1%5.4×18 +376.1%
8 University of OxfordUnited Kingdom 51.135.4%2.0×29 +337.2%
9 Icahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiUnited States 50.626.9%4.6×26 +468.4%
10 Bennett UniversityIndia 50.625.2%15.4×17

Universities only. Score blends excellence (30%), specialisation (25%), size (20%), growth (15%) and international reach (10%), 2015–2022; growth compares 2010–14 with 2015–19.

Is Machine Learning in Healthcare research growing?

Output in 2018–2022 was 283% higher than in 2013–2017, peaking in 2025. The fastest-growing topics are Machine Learning in Healthcare.

19801990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Which topics inside it are moving

Growth and decline on one axis around a shared zero. Two lists side by side hide the thing that matters: whether the growth dwarfs the decline, or the other way round.