U.S. Army Combat Capabilities Development Command Chemical Biological Center
In research, U.S. Army Combat Capabilities Development Command Chemical Biological Center stands highest in Physical Sciences (#7,854 of 21,541 worldwide), over all time.
- World rank, all time
- #13,199 of 42,892
- Rank in ??
- #174 of 1,041
- Research works
- 282 ▼ 59% vs 2013–17
- Citations
- 12k 42.2 per fractional work
- Top-10% rate
- 23.0% record average 16.5%
- Open access
- 24% world 28%
What is U.S. Army Combat Capabilities Development Command Chemical Biological Center known for in research?
The fields where it stands highest, over all time, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.
| Field | World rank | Where that sits | Top-10% rate | Works |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Physical SciencesDomain | #7,854 of 21,541 | 24.7% | 173 |
Each strip is that field’s whole ranked pool, with the notch where U.S. Army Combat Capabilities Development Command Chemical Biological Center sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no world mark, because the world rate differs by field (from about 6% to 21% in this record).
Field profile
Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.
Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Chemistry, 9.8×. Every wedge is a field page.
- Chemistry 9.8×
- Materials Science 4.5×
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3.2×
- Immunology and Microbiology 3.0×
- Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics 3.0×
- Chemical Engineering 2.9×
- Veterinary 2.2×
- Energy 2.2×
- Engineering 1.4×
- Psychology 1.1×
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1.1×
- Nursing 0.9×
- Neuroscience 0.8×
- Environmental Science 0.6×
- Computer Science 0.4×
- Physics and Astronomy 0.3×
- Medicine 0.2×
- Social Sciences 0.1×
Who are the top researchers at U.S. Army Combat Capabilities Development Command Chemical Biological Center?
Ranked on the composite score, H. D. Durst, A. Peter Snyder and Ronald T. Checkai lead among researchers whose main affiliation is U.S. Army Combat Capabilities Development Command Chemical Biological Center.
- 1 H. D. Durst ?? · #128,951 worldwide 287 citations · 43 works
- 2 A. Peter Snyder ?? · #476,766 worldwide 98 citations · 31 works
- 3 Ronald T. Checkai ?? · #1,535,673 worldwide 14 citations · 21 works
- 4 Janet L. Jensen ?? · #1,592,362 worldwide 15 citations · 15 works
Which keywords describe research at U.S. Army Combat Capabilities Development Command Chemical Biological Center?
By fractional works in all years, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Pesticides, Risk Assessment, Environmental Impact, Health Effects, Pathogenesis, Catalysis, Food Safety and Exposure.
- Volatile Organic Compounds
- Porous Materials
- Crystal Engineering
- Genomics
- Aquatic Organisms
- Metal-Organic Frameworks
- Chemical Sensors
- Nanomaterials
- Drug Delivery
- Biomarkers
- Tularemia
- Toxins
- Nanoparticles
- Genomic Analysis
- Organophosphates
- Public Health
- Exposure
- Catalysis
- Health Effects
- Environmental Impact
- Pesticides
- Risk Assessment
- Pathogenesis
- Food Safety
- Neurotoxicity
- Chronic Diseases
- Bioaccumulation
- Toxicity
- Methane Storage
- Anthrax
- CO2 Capture
- Water Quality
- Mass Spectrometry
- Heterogeneous Catalysis
- Environmental Risk Assessment
- Metal Toxicity
- Ecological Impact
- Bioremediation
- Ionic Liquids
- Gas Adsorption
Size is fractional works in all years in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Pesticides28▲ 100×3 topics
- Environmental Impact23▲ 6.2×12 topics
- Risk Assessment22▲ 13×6 topics
- Health Effects20▲ 11×12 topics
- Pathogenesis19▲ 12×13 topics
- Catalysis18▲ 7.8×17 topics
- Food Safety17▲ 22×7 topics
- Exposure15▲ 79×3 topics
- Neurotoxicity14▲ 28×4 topics
- Public Health14▲ 3.7×12 topics
- Chronic Diseases14▲ 17×1 topic
- Organophosphates14▲ 173×1 topic
- Bioaccumulation12▲ 36×3 topics
- Genomic Analysis12▲ 15×9 topics
- Toxicity12▲ 9.7×12 topics
- Nanoparticles11▲ 3.1×18 topics
- Methane Storage11▲ 48×2 topics
- Toxins11▲ 32×2 topics
- Anthrax11▲ 221×1 topic
- Tularemia11▲ 221×1 topic
- CO2 Capture10▲ 26×5 topics
- Biomarkers10▲ 5.8×4 topics
- Water Quality10▲ 8.6×5 topics
- Drug Delivery10▲ 7.4×7 topics
- Mass Spectrometry10▲ 16×5 topics
- Nanomaterials10▲ 4.2×15 topics
- Heterogeneous Catalysis9▲ 18×4 topics
- Chemical Sensors9▲ 18×3 topics
- Environmental Risk Assessment9▲ 32×4 topics
- Metal-Organic Frameworks9▲ 12×6 topics
- Metal Toxicity9▲ 39×2 topics
- Aquatic Organisms8▲ 71×1 topic
- Ecological Impact8▲ 42×1 topic
- Genomics8▲ 8.3×7 topics
- Bioremediation8▲ 18×3 topics
- Crystal Engineering8▲ 23×2 topics
- Ionic Liquids8▲ 8.3×8 topics
- Porous Materials8▲ 32×2 topics
- Gas Adsorption8▲ 46×1 topic
- Volatile Organic Compounds7▲ 23×3 topics
Which research topics does U.S. Army Combat Capabilities Development Command Chemical Biological Center publish most on?
By volume in 2022–2025: Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications, Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies, Bacillus and Francisella bacterial research and Yersinia bacterium, plague, ectoparasites research.
Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.
- 1 Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications Inorganic Chemistry 0 works
- 2 Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies Biomedical Engineering 0 works
- 3 Bacillus and Francisella bacterial research Molecular Biology 0 works
- 4 Yersinia bacterium, plague, ectoparasites research Genetics 0 works
- 5 Analytical chemistry methods development Analytical Chemistry 0 works
- 6 Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties Materials Chemistry 0 works
- 7 Poxvirus research and outbreaks Virology 0 works
- 8 Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications Spectroscopy 0 works
- 9 Laser-Ablation Synthesis of Nanoparticles Biomedical Engineering 0 works
- 10 Biosensors and Analytical Detection Biomedical Engineering 0 works
How open and international is its research?
Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.
World: 28% of research is openly available.
World: 19% is written across borders.
How has U.S. Army Combat Capabilities Development Command Chemical Biological Center's research output changed?
Output in 2018–2022 was 59% lower than in 2013–2017.
The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Other research institutions in Aberdeen Proving Ground
- Defense Center for Public Health - Aberdeen
- U.S. Army Aberdeen Test Center
- U.S. Army Evaluation Center
Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.