Science Explorer Interactive view Map

Energetic Materials and Combustion

Energetic Materials and Combustion is a research topic within Mechanics of Materials. Science Explorer counts 29k research works in it since 1950. 23.4% of them reached the world's top 10% most cited for their field and year.

This cluster of papers focuses on the development, characterization, and applications of energetic materials, including energetic salts, nanoenergetic materials, high-energy density materials, and metal nanoparticles. It also covers the use of reactive force fields such as ReaxFF and molecular dynamics simulations to study the behavior and properties of these materials.

  • ReaxFF
  • Energetic Salts
  • Nanoenergetic Materials
  • High-Energy Density Materials
  • Metal Nanoparticles
  • Ionic Liquids
  • Crystal Packing
  • Thermal Decomposition
  • High-Performance Explosives
  • Molecular Dynamics Simulations
Research works
29k
fractional, since 1950
In the world top 10%
6.9k
per year above
Top-10% rate
23.4%
share of its works in the world top 10%
Growth, 2013–17 → 2018–22
+22%
the tick is no change

Which countries lead Energetic Materials and Combustion research?

By volume, China and the United States publish the most (2.6k and 645 works in 2022–2025).

By volume, 2022–2025

  1. 1 China 2.6k works
  2. 2 United States 645 works
  3. 3 Russia 354 works
  4. 4 India 333 works
  5. 5 Germany 103 works
  6. 6 France 100 works
  7. 7 Poland 90 works
  8. 8 Japan 86 works
  9. 9 United Kingdom 81 works
  10. 10 Italy 69 works

How concentrated that is

The same countries as shares of everything the list above accounts for. A node where two countries do two thirds of the work and one spread evenly across twelve read alike as a ranking and not at all alike here.

China: 58.1%United States: 14.5%Russia: 8.0%India: 7.5%6 others listed: 11.9%58%largest
China2,584 · 58.1%United States645 · 14.5%Russia354 · 8.0%India333 · 7.5%6 others listed529 · 11.9%

Shares of the rows listed above, not of the whole node.

Which institutions lead Energetic Materials and Combustion research?

By volume in 2022–2025, Nanjing University of Science and Technology publishes the most Energetic Materials and Combustion research, followed by Beijing Institute of Technology and Northwestern Polytechnical University.

Who are the leading researchers in Energetic Materials and Combustion?

The most-cited researchers publishing on Energetic Materials and Combustion include Marc A. Meyers and William A. Goddard.

  1. 1 Marc A. Meyers United States 3.2k citations
  2. 2 William A. Goddard United States 3.2k citations

Ranked by citations received across their whole record, among researchers with at least three works on this topic.

Where is Energetic Materials and Combustion research done?

The largest centres of Energetic Materials and Combustion research in 2022–2025 are Beijing (China), Nanjing (China), Xi'an (China) and Mianyang (China). Among places with at least 20 works in it, it is an unusually large share of all research in Chernogolovka, Mianyang and Los Alamos.

Largest cities, 2022–2025

  1. 1 Beijing China 620 works
  2. 2 Nanjing China 468 works
  3. 3 Xi'an China 279 works
  4. 4 Mianyang China 154 works
  5. 5 Moscow Russia 135 works
  6. 6 Taiyuan China 123 works
  7. 7 Wuhan China 73 works
  8. 8 Shanghai China 67 works
  9. 9 Los Alamos United States 63 works
  10. 10 Changsha China 57 works

Where it is the local speciality

  1. ChernogolovkaRU · 42.4 works81×
  2. MianyangCN · 153.8 works55×
  3. Los AlamosUS · 62.6 works45×
  4. LivermoreUS · 39.2 works30×
← less than its size predictsmore →

Location quotient: how much more of its research is in Energetic Materials and Combustion than the world average.

See Energetic Materials and Combustion on the map

Where is the best place to study Energetic Materials and Combustion?

Among universities, judged by research, Polytechnic School of Algiers, Dalian University and Northwestern Polytechnical University score highest, combining excellence, specialisation, size, growth and international reach. Research strength is one signal when choosing where to study; it does not measure teaching.

0%50%100%mean 41.78%fractional works in this node (log) →share in the world top 10% →Polytechnic School of Algiers: 23, 32.8%Dalian University: 13, 67.3%Northwestern Polytechnical University: 112, 43.4%Beijing Institute of Technology: 294, 22.8%Nanjing University of Science and Technology: 372, 20.2%Air Force Engineering University: 8, 73.0%Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur: 17, 47.4%National Institute of Technology Kurukshetra: 10, 48.9%National Research Tomsk State University: 17, 13.7%University of Idaho: 10, 48.3%Dalian UniversityNorthwestern Polytec…Polytechnic School o…Beijing Institute of…
above the meannear itbelow it

One dot per university in the table below. The upper left is the interesting corner: small places doing unusually strong work.

#UniversityScoreTop 10%SpecialisationWorksGrowth
1 Polytechnic School of AlgiersAlgeria 62.032.8%91.0×23 +404.6%
2 Dalian UniversityChina 61.367.3%10.6×13
3 Northwestern Polytechnical UniversityChina 60.343.4%19.5×112 -4.8%
4 Beijing Institute of TechnologyChina 58.222.8%49.5×294 +14.1%
5 Nanjing University of Science and TechnologyChina 57.220.2%90.6×372 -2.0%
6 Air Force Engineering UniversityChina 55.573.0%11.2×8 -26.2%
7 Indian Institute of Technology KanpurIndia 54.747.4%10.5×17 +35.3%
8 National Institute of Technology KurukshetraIndia 52.248.9%18.9×10
9 National Research Tomsk State UniversityRussia 52.013.7%17.5×17 +281.2%
10 University of IdahoUnited States 51.848.3%17.6×10 +25.6%

Universities only. Score blends excellence (30%), specialisation (25%), size (20%), growth (15%) and international reach (10%), 2015–2022; growth compares 2010–14 with 2015–19.

Is Energetic Materials and Combustion research growing?

Output in 2018–2022 was 22% higher than in 2013–2017, peaking in 2025. The fastest-growing topics are Energetic Materials and Combustion.

19801990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Which topics inside it are moving

Growth and decline on one axis around a shared zero. Two lists side by side hide the thing that matters: whether the growth dwarfs the decline, or the other way round.