- World rank, all time
- #35,062 of 42,892
- Rank in United States
- #7,439 of 8,685
- Research works
- 128 ▼ 69% vs 2013–17
- Citations
- 794 6.2 per fractional work
- Top-10% rate
- 0.0% record average 16.5%
- Open access
- 12% world 28%
Field profile
Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.
Who are the top researchers at Washington State Community College?
Ranked on the composite score, Herman J. Deutsch, Paul H. Landis and M. S. Knebelman lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Washington State Community College.
- 1 Herman J. Deutsch United States · #863,916 worldwide 3 citations · 19 works
- 2 Paul H. Landis United States · #1,124,656 worldwide 40 citations · 43 works
- 3 M. S. Knebelman United States · #1,137,995 worldwide 5 citations · 16 works
Which keywords describe research at Washington State Community College?
By fractional works in all years, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Identity, Nationalism, History, Culture, Globalization, Gender, Literature and Public Opinion.
- Phase Transitions
- Historiography
- Cold War
- Psychology
- Conceptual Change
- Race
- Ethnicity
- Language
- Cultural Studies
- Adaptation
- International Relations
- Methane Production
- Democracy
- Feminism
- Constitutional government
- Human Rights
- Public Opinion
- Gender
- History
- Nationalism
- Identity
- Globalization
- Culture
- Literature
- Sustainability
- American founding
- Education
- Colonialism
- Milk Composition
- Ruminant Nutrition
- Media
- Cultural Identity
- Social Support
- Educational Inequality
- Financial Reporting
- Social Movements
- Film
- Theory
- Ethnic Identity
- Natural Selection
Size is fractional works in all years in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Identity12▲ 12×18 topics
- Nationalism11▲ 15×8 topics
- Globalization10▲ 4.4×19 topics
- History8▲ 8.1×9 topics
- Culture8▲ 13×10 topics
- Gender8▲ 10×9 topics
- Literature7▲ 10×12 topics
- Public Opinion6▲ 26×2 topics
- Sustainability6▲ 2.6×8 topics
- Human Rights6▲ 5.3×9 topics
- American founding6▲ 62×1 topic
- Constitutional government6▲ 62×1 topic
- Education5▲ 3.1×11 topics
- Feminism5▲ 14×8 topics
- Colonialism4▲ 7.0×7 topics
- Democracy4▲ 8.4×4 topics
- Milk Composition4▲ 52×2 topics
- Methane Production4▲ 67×1 topic
- Ruminant Nutrition4▲ 67×1 topic
- International Relations3▲ 12×5 topics
- Media3▲ 19×2 topics
- Adaptation3▲ 7.9×3 topics
- Cultural Identity3▲ 5.3×5 topics
- Cultural Studies3▲ 6.3×5 topics
- Social Support3▲ 4.9×5 topics
- Language3▲ 9.8×4 topics
- Educational Inequality3▲ 33×3 topics
- Ethnicity3▲ 7.0×2 topics
- Financial Reporting3▲ 19×4 topics
- Race3▲ 16×5 topics
- Social Movements3▲ 6.4×6 topics
- Conceptual Change2▲ 61×2 topics
- Film2▲ 114×1 topic
- Psychology2▲ 14×5 topics
- Theory2▲ 102×1 topic
- Cold War2▲ 23×3 topics
- Ethnic Identity2▲ 20×2 topics
- Historiography2▲ 13×3 topics
- Natural Selection2▲ 22×2 topics
- Phase Transitions2▲ 13×2 topics
Which research topics does Washington State Community College publish most on?
By volume in 2022–2025: Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology.
- 1 Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology Health 0 works
How open and international is its research?
Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.
World: 28% of research is openly available.
World: 19% is written across borders.
How has Washington State Community College's research output changed?
Output in 2018–2022 was 69% lower than in 2013–2017.
The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Other research institutions in Marietta
Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.