Bradley S. Witzel
Bradley S. Witzel publishes mostly in Education, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Statistics and Probability, on topics such as Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills, Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques and Reading and Literacy Development.
- World rank
- #756,225 of 7,710,434 ranked researchers
- Rank in United States
- #253,777 of 1,627,098
- Works
- 69
- Citations
- 1.5k
- Citations per work
- 21.6
What does Bradley S. Witzel research?
Bradley S. Witzel's work is mostly in Social Sciences (34%), Psychology (21%), Mathematics (19%).
Their six largest subfields, inside their fields and domains; the grey slice is everything else they publish. The interactive view splits every one of their works down to single topics.
The fields and subfields, with their numbers
- Social Sciences4057.7%
- Social Sciences2434.3%
- Psychology1420.9%
- Arts and Humanities22.5%
- Everything else1420.8%
- Physical Sciences1319.0%
- Mathematics1319.0%
- Health Sciences22.5%
- Health Professions22.5%
- 1Education28% of their works
- 2Developmental and Educational Psychology21% of their works
- 3Statistics and Probability19% of their works
- 4Safety Research6% of their works
- 5Language and Linguistics2% of their works
- 6Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation2% of their works
Research topics
- Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills
- Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
- Reading and Literacy Development
- Behavioral and Psychological Studies
- Disability Education and Employment
- Educational and Psychological Assessments
- Education Systems and Policy
- Collaborative Teaching and Inclusion
Which keywords describe Bradley S. Witzel's research?
The keywords of their largest research topics: Mathematical Achievement, Numerical Cognition, Language Development, Special Education, Pedagogical Content Knowledge, Teacher Knowledge, Dyslexia and Reading Acquisition.
- Vocational Education
- Inclusive Education
- Dynamic Assessment
- Universal Design for Learning
- Evidence-Based Practice
- Reading Acquisition
- Teacher Knowledge
- Special Education
- Numerical Cognition
- Mathematical Achievement
- Language Development
- Pedagogical Content Knowledge
- Dyslexia
- Behavioral Interventions
- Self-Determination
- Co-Teaching
- Educational Psychology
- Training Pathways
Size is their works in the topics tagged with each word, from their 8 largest topics. Each links to the topic it comes from most. The words come from the keyword list OpenAlex gives each topic, not from the text of the papers, so a word can appear that none of the papers uses.
All 18 words, with their numbers
- Mathematical Achievement311 topic
- Numerical Cognition311 topic
- Language Development192 topics
- Special Education182 topics
- Pedagogical Content Knowledge141 topic
- Teacher Knowledge141 topic
- Dyslexia131 topic
- Reading Acquisition131 topic
- Behavioral Interventions121 topic
- Evidence-Based Practice121 topic
- Self-Determination81 topic
- Universal Design for Learning81 topic
- Co-Teaching61 topic
- Dynamic Assessment61 topic
- Educational Psychology61 topic
- Inclusive Education61 topic
- Training Pathways61 topic
- Vocational Education61 topic
Where does Bradley S. Witzel work?
Bradley S. Witzel's main affiliation in the publication record is Winthrop University, United States.
How many publications and citations does Bradley S. Witzel have?
OpenAlex counts 69 works and 1,487 citations for Bradley S. Witzel, an h-index of 16, ranking #756,225 of 7,710,434 researchers worldwide on the quality score.
Ranked on field-normalised citation excellence (50%), output (30%) and citations (20%). Counts come from OpenAlex author records, which occasionally merge different people who share a name or split one person into several.
Papers, co-authors, who cited this work and researchers on the nearest topics have tabs of their own, above. Is this your page? Claim it with your ORCID iD, or request a correction or removal.
Discussion
Ask a question or share a note about Bradley S. Witzel. Keep it to the research: no personal attacks, advertising or links. Any reader can report a post, which collapses it for everyone until it is opened.