Science Explorer Interactive view Map
Topic · Immunology and Allergy

Allergic Rhinitis and Sensitization

Allergic Rhinitis and Sensitization is a research topic within Immunology and Allergy. Science Explorer counts 44k research works in it since 1950. 16.4% of them reached the world's top 10% most cited for their field and year.

This cluster of papers focuses on the impact of allergic rhinitis on asthma, including allergen-specific immunotherapy, immunological mechanisms, and the influence of environmental factors such as pollen allergy and climate change. It also addresses the epidemiology, quality of life, and management strategies for allergic rhinitis and its comorbidity with asthma.

  • Allergen-specific Immunotherapy
  • Asthma
  • Pollen Allergy
  • T Regulatory Cells
  • Immunological Mechanisms
  • Sublingual Immunotherapy
  • House Dust Mite Allergens
  • Climate Change
  • Epidemiology
  • Quality of Life
Research works
44k
fractional, since 1950
In the world top 10%
7.3k
per year above
Top-10% rate
16.4%
share of its works in the world top 10%
Growth, 2013–17 → 2018–22
+17%
the tick is no change

This ranks research output and citation impact. It says nothing about the quality of diagnosis, treatment or care.

Which countries lead Allergic Rhinitis and Sensitization research?

By volume, the United States and China publish the most (1.2k and 1k works in 2022–2025).

By volume, 2022–2025

  1. 1 United States 1.2k works
  2. 2 China 1k works
  3. 3 Japan 347 works
  4. 4 Germany 342 works
  5. 5 Italy 295 works
  6. 6 India 283 works
  7. 7 France 265 works
  8. 8 Spain 248 works
  9. 9 United Kingdom 225 works
  10. 10 South Korea 224 works

How concentrated that is

The same countries as shares of everything the list above accounts for. A node where two countries do two thirds of the work and one spread evenly across twelve read alike as a ranking and not at all alike here.

United States: 26.2%China: 23.4%Japan: 7.8%Germany: 7.7%6 others listed: 34.8%26%largest
United States1,160 · 26.2%China1,038 · 23.4%Japan347 · 7.8%Germany342 · 7.7%6 others listed1,541 · 34.8%

Shares of the rows listed above, not of the whole node.

Which institutions lead Allergic Rhinitis and Sensitization research?

By volume in 2022–2025, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College publishes the most Allergic Rhinitis and Sensitization research, followed by Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai and Capital Medical University.

By volume, 2022–2025

  1. 1 Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical CollegeChina 25 works
  2. 2 Icahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiUnited States 24 works
  3. 3 Capital Medical UniversityChina 22 works
  4. 4 Northwestern UniversityUnited States 21 works
  5. 5 Medical University of ViennaAustria 20 works
  6. 6 University of North Carolina at Chapel HillUnited States 19 works
  7. 7 Harvard UniversityUnited States 19 works
  8. 8 Guangzhou Medical UniversityChina 18 works
  9. 9 Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese MedicineChina 16 works
  10. 10 Johns Hopkins UniversityUnited States 16 works

Where is Allergic Rhinitis and Sensitization research done?

The largest centres of Allergic Rhinitis and Sensitization research in 2022–2025 are Beijing (China), Seoul (South Korea), Tokyo (Japan) and Moscow (Russia).

Largest cities, 2022–2025

  1. 1 Beijing China 189 works
  2. 2 Seoul South Korea 109 works
  3. 3 Tokyo Japan 105 works
  4. 4 Moscow Russia 94 works
  5. 5 Guangzhou China 86 works
  6. 6 London United Kingdom 86 works
  7. 7 Paris France 74 works
  8. 8 Madrid Spain 74 works
  9. 9 Shanghai China 68 works
  10. 10 New York United States 62 works
See Allergic Rhinitis and Sensitization on the map

Where is the best place to study Allergic Rhinitis and Sensitization?

Among universities, judged by research, Humanitas University, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai and Medical University of Vienna score highest, combining excellence, specialisation, size, growth and international reach. Research strength is one signal when choosing where to study; it does not measure teaching.

0%20%40%mean 31.41%fractional works in this node (log) →share in the world top 10% →Humanitas University: 10, 43.4%Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai: 24, 36.0%Medical University of Vienna: 20, 25.7%Wroclaw Medical University: 16, 23.9%University of Miami: 14, 41.3%Northwestern University: 20, 36.5%Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine: 16, 35.5%Medical University of Warsaw: 16, 9.9%Capital Medical University: 22, 26.6%Harvard University: 19, 35.3%Humanitas UniversityIcahn School of Medi…Medical University o…Wroclaw Medical Univ…
above the meannear itbelow it

One dot per university in the table below. The upper left is the interesting corner: small places doing unusually strong work.

#UniversityScoreTop 10%SpecialisationWorksGrowth
1 Humanitas UniversityItaly 69.343.4%20.2×10 —
2 Icahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiUnited States 68.636.0%7.8×24 +26.0%
3 Medical University of ViennaAustria 67.425.7%10.6×20 +7.0%
4 Wroclaw Medical UniversityPoland 64.223.9%16.8×16 +121.0%
5 University of MiamiUnited States 63.541.3%4.7×14 +173.5%
6 Northwestern UniversityUnited States 61.536.5%4.8×20 +81.4%
7 Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese MedicineChina 60.235.5%11.7×16 -47.9%
8 Medical University of WarsawPoland 57.39.9%11.3×16 +166.5%
9 Capital Medical UniversityChina 55.426.6%6.1×22 +39.7%
10 Harvard UniversityUnited States 53.535.3%2.4×19 +52.2%

Universities only. Score blends excellence (30%), specialisation (25%), size (20%), growth (15%) and international reach (10%), 2015–2022; growth compares 2010–14 with 2015–19.

Is Allergic Rhinitis and Sensitization research growing?

Output in 2018–2022 was 17% higher than in 2013–2017, peaking in 2023. The fastest-growing topics are Allergic Rhinitis and Sensitization.

19801990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Which topics inside it are moving

Growth and decline on one axis around a shared zero. Two lists side by side hide the thing that matters: whether the growth dwarfs the decline, or the other way round.