Question 1

Which countries lead Esophageal and GI Pathology research?

Accepted Answer

By volume, the United States and China publish the most (2.3k and 1.3k works in 2022-now).

Question 2

Which institutions lead Esophageal and GI Pathology research?

Accepted Answer

By volume in 2022-now, Mayo Clinic publishes the most Esophageal and GI Pathology research, followed by Harvard University and All India Institute of Medical Sciences.

Question 3

Who are the leading researchers in Esophageal and GI Pathology?

Accepted Answer

The most-cited researchers publishing on Esophageal and GI Pathology include Freddie Bray, Zhong Lin Wang and George Davey Smith.

Question 4

Where is Esophageal and GI Pathology research done?

Accepted Answer

The largest centres of Esophageal and GI Pathology research in 2022-now are Tokyo (Japan), London (United Kingdom), Beijing (China) and Seoul (South Korea). Among places with at least 20 works in it, it is an unusually large share of all research in Rozzano.

Question 5

Where is the best place to study Esophageal and GI Pathology?

Accepted Answer

Among universities, judged by research, University of Amsterdam, University College London and Harvard University score highest, combining citation excellence, specialisation, size, growth and international reach. Research strength is one signal when choosing where to study; it does not measure teaching.

Question 6

Is Esophageal and GI Pathology research growing?

Accepted Answer

Output in 2022-2025 was 1% higher than in 2018-2021, peaking in 2020. The fastest-growing topics are Esophageal and GI Pathology.

Question 7

What are the most cited papers in Esophageal and GI Pathology?

Accepted Answer

The most cited paper in Esophageal and GI Pathology is "A candidate genetic risk factor for vascular disease: a common mutation in methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase" (Phyllis Frosst, Henk J. Blom, Renate Milos et al., 1995), with 5,732 citations. Next come "Symptomatic Gastroesophageal Reflux as a Risk Factor for Esophageal Adenocarcinoma" (3,048) and "Endoscopic sphincterotomy complications and their management: an attempt at consensus" (2,873).