Science Explorer Back to mapMap
Compare · Countries

Greenland vs Suriname

On research quality in 2022-now, Greenland ranks #171 in the world and Suriname #173, of 189 countries.

Research profiles alike: 0.62similar shapes of research, whatever their size. How it is measured

Compare other countries
vs

Greenland

World rank, 2022-now
#171
#138 all time
Works, 2022-now
223
fractional
Top-10% rate
9.1%
share of its work among the world's most cited
Open access
51%
of its works free to read

Strongest relative focus: Atmospheric Science, Ecology, Oceanography.

Suriname

World rank, 2022-now
#173
#187 all time
Works, 2022-now
242
fractional
Top-10% rate
4.3%
share of its work among the world's most cited
Open access
63%
of its works free to read

Strongest relative focus: Biochemistry, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Health Information Management.

Who leads, measure by measure?

Greenland leads on 5 of 9 measures: research quality, excellence for its fields, top-10% rate, citations per work and international co-authorship. Suriname leads on 3 of 9 measures: output, open access and growth. The two are level on institutions in the world top 100.

Greenland 51 level3 Suriname
  1. #171Research qualityworld rank of 189 countries, 2022-now#173
  2. 0.94×Excellence for its fieldsits top-10% rate against what its topics predict; 1.00× is as expected0.90×
  3. 223Outputfractional works, 2022-now242
  4. 9.1%Top-10% rateshare of its works among the world's most cited4.3%
  5. 20.0Citations per workall time, per fractional work8.0
  6. 0World top 100institutions it holds among the world's best 1000
  7. 51%Open accessof its works free to read, all time63%
  8. 61%Internationalof its works written with co-authors abroad, all time39%
  9. +3%Growthworks in 2022-25 against 2018-21; half a bar is no change+4%

A rank is drawn as its standing: the longer the bar, the nearer the top. Anything else is drawn against the larger of the two, and two values a hair apart are called level. Quality, excellence and the top-10% rate are explained in the methodology.

What is each known for?

The keywords that describe each side's research, by fractional works in 2022-now and weighted toward what it does more of than the world.

Greenland

▲ more of its work than of the world's◆ about the world's share▼ less than the world's
All 40 words, with their numbers
  1. Climate Change82▲ 12×43 topics
  2. Arctic23▲ 79×4 topics
  3. Food Security21▲ 15×3 topics
  4. Vulnerability19▲ 31×3 topics
  5. Ecological Knowledge19▲ 168×2 topics
  6. Nutrition Transition18▲ 219×2 topics
  7. Arctic Indigenous Peoples18▲ 403×1 topic
  8. Traditional Knowledge18▲ 166×1 topic
  9. Population Dynamics17▲ 25×6 topics
  10. Remote Sensing16▲ 5.0×12 topics
  11. Conservation14▲ 13×12 topics
  12. Sustainability12▲ 1.88×17 topics
  13. Predator-Prey Interactions12▲ 57×2 topics
  14. Acoustic Communication11▲ 84×2 topics
  15. Ocean Circulation11▲ 31×3 topics
  16. Anthropogenic Noise11▲ 147×1 topic
  17. Marine Mammals11▲ 147×1 topic
  18. Fisheries Sustainability10▲ 46×2 topics
  19. Decline10▲ 144×1 topic
  20. Sea Ice10▲ 144×1 topic
  21. Trophic Cascades9▲ 39×2 topics
  22. Governance8▲ 9.3×3 topics
  23. Geopolitics8▲ 19×2 topics
  24. Hydrology8▲ 22×3 topics
  25. International Relations8▲ 12×2 topics
  26. Northern Sea Route7▲ 108×1 topic
  27. Shipping7▲ 57×1 topic
  28. Ecosystem Management7▲ 45×1 topic
  29. Marine Fisheries7▲ 66×1 topic
  30. Invasive Species7▲ 6.0×11 topics
  31. Health Effects6▲ 4.1×14 topics
  32. Permafrost6▲ 51×2 topics
  33. Health Equity5▲ 6.5×4 topics
  34. Biogeography5▲ 6.5×7 topics
  35. Social Sciences4▲ 12×2 topics
  36. Habitat Selection4▲ 22×2 topics
  37. Benthic Communities4▲ 26×2 topics
  38. Marine Biodiversity4▲ 26×2 topics
  39. Decolonization4▲ 19×3 topics
  40. Methane Emissions4▲ 30×2 topics

Suriname

▲ more of its work than of the world's◆ about the world's share▼ less than the world's
All 40 words, with their numbers
  1. Community Empowerment25▲ 13×9 topics
  2. Health Education24▲ 21×6 topics
  3. Epidemiology18▲ 1.74×50 topics
  4. Non-Communicable Diseases17▲ 23×3 topics
  5. Maternal Health17▲ 25×3 topics
  6. Breastfeeding16▲ 27×2 topics
  7. Child Nutrition16▲ 33×1 topic
  8. Stunting16▲ 33×1 topic
  9. Sustainable Development15▲ 3.7×23 topics
  10. Environmental Impact14▲ 3.1×27 topics
  11. Sustainability14▲ 2.1×21 topics
  12. Climate Change12▲ 1.71×34 topics
  13. Food Safety12▲ 15×6 topics
  14. Antioxidant Activity11▲ 6.5×8 topics
  15. Mental Health10▲ 2.6×20 topics
  16. Biodiversity10▲ 4.8×17 topics
  17. COVID-1910▲ 2.8×12 topics
  18. Public Health9▲ 2.4×25 topics
  19. Remote Sensing8▲ 2.6×10 topics
  20. Pandemic8▲ 3.1×7 topics
  21. Nutrition8▲ 7.0×6 topics
  22. Mineral Content8▲ 30×2 topics
  23. Food Composition8▲ 36×1 topic
  24. Nutrient Analysis8▲ 36×1 topic
  25. Antioxidants7▲ 6.3×7 topics
  26. Community Participation7▲ 7.6×5 topics
  27. Healthcare Access7▲ 9.5×6 topics
  28. Local Wisdom7▲ 5.5×6 topics
  29. Economic Impact7▲ 4.6×3 topics
  30. Indonesia6▲ 5.5×3 topics
  31. Medicinal Plants6▲ 6.3×10 topics
  32. Patient Satisfaction5▲ 6.4×5 topics
  33. Health Research5▲ 18×2 topics
  34. Organizational Behavior5▲ 12×3 topics
  35. Barriers5▲ 23×1 topic
  36. Nursing5▲ 9.9×2 topics
  37. Patient Experience5▲ 18×2 topics
  38. Quality of Service5▲ 19×1 topic
  39. Behavioral Science5▲ 44×1 topic
  40. Medical Physiology5▲ 44×1 topic

Size is fractional works in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of the side's work against its share of the world's. Each word links to the topic it comes from most.

How has their output grown?

Suriname has out-published Greenland every year since 2025, when it overtook it.

still counting50100Suriname71 in 2025Greenland44 in 20251990200020102020

Fractional works per year.

Their share of all research

Growing output can still be a shrinking share, because all of science grows. Each line is a side as a percentage of every work published that year.

still counting0.0010%0.0020%0.0030%Suriname0.0012% in 2025Greenland0.00075% in 202519801990200020102020

Fractional works over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.

How much of it reaches the world top 10%

The share of each side's works, year by year, that reached the world's 10% most cited for their field and year. The average of all institutions is 10.0% (why not 10%).

still counting5%10%15%Greenland12.0% in 2025Suriname4.7% in 202520102020

A year with under 1% of the side's peak output is left out: a rate over a handful of papers says nothing. The latest years are still being cited.

Who holds more of the world's best institutions?

A country's average quality and the number of institutions it holds at the very top can disagree, and both are worth knowing. The counts are nested: an institution in the top 50 is also in the top 100.

Greenland 05 level0 Suriname
  1. 0In the world top 500
  2. 0In the top 1000
  3. 0In the top 5000
  4. 0In the top 1,0000
  5. #51Elite capacityrank among 204 countries#51

Institutions ranked on research quality, 2022-now. Elite capacity counts a country's institutions by their worldwide rank, weighted so a place at #1 counts for more than one at #480.

Which publishes more research, Greenland or Suriname?

Suriname publishes 1.1× as much research as Greenland in 2022-now (242 against 223 fractional works).

Whose research has more impact, Greenland or Suriname?

9.1% of Greenland's research reaches the world's top 10% most cited, against 4.3% for Suriname.

Is Greenland or Suriname growing faster?

Output in 2022-25 was +4% against 2018-21 for Suriname, and +3% for Greenland.

Which has more open access research, Greenland or Suriname?

63% of Suriname's research is free to read, against 51% of Greenland's.

Which has more world-class institutions, Greenland or Suriname?

Greenland holds 0 of the world's top 100 research institutions and Suriname 0; in the top 1,000 it is 0 against 0.

Which institutions lead in each country?

The highest-ranked institutions on each side on research quality, 2022-now. The percentage is each institution's own top-10% rate: the share of its works that are among the world's 10% most cited for their field and year. Every figure stands alone, so they do not add up to 100%.

Greenland

  1. 1Ilisimatusarfik7.5% top 10% · 99 works
  2. 2Grønlands Naturinstitut11.5% top 10% · 88 works

The number is the rank inside the country. The track on each row is the top-10% rate; the tick is the average of all institutions, 10.0% (how it is set): teal above it, red below. The ranking is the quality score, which compares the rate with what each institution's own topics predict and adds a small reward for size, so the rates do not fall in order.

Who are the top researchers on each side?

The most cited researchers on each side, among those ranked.

Greenland

  1. 1 Lorenz Meire #298,354 worldwide 3.2k citations · 174 works
  2. 2 John Mortensen #323,266 worldwide 3.8k citations · 99 works
  3. 3 Alexandra Messerli #413,578 worldwide 351 citations · 1,945 works
  4. 4 Erik W. Born #443,074 worldwide 11k citations · 227 works
  5. 5 Malene J. Simon #444,230 worldwide 2.8k citations · 88 works

Suriname

  1. 1 Tom Hendriks #1,176,387 worldwide 1k citations · 19 works
  2. 2 Paul Edward Ouboter #1,313,853 worldwide 2.2k citations · 91 works
  3. 3 Jan H.A. Mol #1,401,085 worldwide 1.4k citations · 68 works
  4. 4 Stephen Vreden #1,599,189 worldwide 2k citations · 127 works
  5. 5 Rosita Bihariesingh-Sanchit #1,962,603 worldwide 187 citations · 25 works