China University of Petroleum, East China vs King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals
On research quality in 2022–now, China University of Petroleum, East China ranks #182 in the world and King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals #217, of 28,054 institutions. China University of Petroleum, East China stands higher in 5 of the 10 fields both publish in, King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals in 5.
Research profiles alike: 0.96very similar shapes of research, whatever their size. How it is measured
China University of Petroleum, East China
- World rank, 2022–now
- #182
- #736 all time
- Works, 2022–now
- 9.7k
- fractional
- Top-10% rate
- 21.7%
- share of its work among the world’s most cited
- Open access
- 26%
- of its works free to read
Strongest relative focus: Ocean Engineering, Metals and Alloys, Filtration and Separation.
King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals
- World rank, 2022–now
- #217
- #566 all time
- Works, 2022–now
- 7.2k
- fractional
- Top-10% rate
- 26.2%
- share of its work among the world’s most cited
- Open access
- 26%
- of its works free to read
Strongest relative focus: Metals and Alloys, Ocean Engineering, Energy Engineering and Power Technology.
Who leads in each field?
China University of Petroleum, East China stands higher in 5 of 10 fields, King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals in 5. Each bar is that side’s standing among all institutions ranked in the field: the full bar is first place.
- —Business, Management and Accounting#416
- #64Chemical Engineering#41
- #110Chemistry#82
- #364Computer Science#350
- #263Earth and Planetary Sciences—
- #42Economics, Econometrics and Finance—
- #10Energy#39
- #77Engineering#81
- #123Environmental Science#89
- #58Materials Science#67
Standing is the percentile of world rank within each field, 2022–now; the printed number is the rank itself. A dash means the field is too small there to rank. How sides are compared.
Where does each put its research?
Not who is better, but what each side chooses to work on. A country or institution that puts twice the world’s share of its research into a field sits at 2×, whatever its size.
- Earth and Planetary Sciences4.2× 2.2×
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance0.6× 0.3×
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology0.3× 0.2×
- Arts and Humanities0.1× 0.1×
- Immunology and Microbiology0.1× 0.0×
- Chemistry2.8× 2.3×
- Medicine0.1× 0.1×
- Engineering3.2× 3.0×
- Physics and Astronomy0.7× 0.7×
- Neuroscience0.2× 0.2×
- Chemical Engineering5.4× 5.2×
- Computer Science1.2× 1.1×
- Veterinary0.0× 0.0×
- Materials Science2.6× 2.8×
- Environmental Science1.4× 1.8×
- Energy4.0× 5.4×
- Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics0.1× 0.2×
- Mathematics0.9× 1.4×
- Decision Sciences0.8× 1.2×
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences0.1× 0.1×
- Dentistry0.1× 0.1×
- Psychology0.1× 0.2×
- Nursing0.0× 0.1×
- Social Sciences0.1× 0.2×
- Business, Management and Accounting0.2× 0.6×
- Health Professions0.1× 0.1×
Location quotient in 2022–now: the share of each side’s research in the field over the world’s share. 1× is the world’s balance; the axis runs from a quarter of it to four times. Fields where China University of Petroleum, East China leans further are at the top, King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals’s at the bottom. How research profiles are compared.
How has their output grown?
Fractional works per year. The latest, partial year is left off.
Which publishes more research, China University of Petroleum, East China or King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals?
China University of Petroleum, East China publishes 1.4× as much research as King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals in 2022–now (9.7k against 7.2k fractional works).
Whose research has more impact, China University of Petroleum, East China or King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals?
26.2% of King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals's research reaches the world's top 10% most cited, against 21.7% for China University of Petroleum, East China.