Chinese University of Hong Kong vs Howard Hughes Medical Institute
On research quality in 2022–now, Chinese University of Hong Kong ranks #66 in the world and Howard Hughes Medical Institute #68, of 28,054 institutions. Chinese University of Hong Kong stands higher in 7 of the 11 fields both publish in, Howard Hughes Medical Institute in 4.
Research profiles alike: -0.02different shapes of research, whatever their size. How it is measured
Chinese University of Hong Kong
- World rank, 2022–now
- #66
- #220 all time
- Works, 2022–now
- 14k
- fractional
- Top-10% rate
- 29.1%
- share of its work among the world’s most cited
- Open access
- 32%
- of its works free to read
Strongest relative focus: Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, Linguistics and Language, Geophysics.
Howard Hughes Medical Institute
- World rank, 2022–now
- #68
- #15 all time
- Works, 2022–now
- 1.7k
- fractional
- Top-10% rate
- 49.8%
- share of its work among the world’s most cited
- Open access
- 63%
- of its works free to read
Strongest relative focus: Aging, Structural Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience.
Who leads in each field?
Chinese University of Hong Kong stands higher in 7 of 11 fields, Howard Hughes Medical Institute in 4. Each bar is that side’s standing among all institutions ranked in the field: the full bar is first place.
- —Agricultural and Biological Sciences#444
- #29Arts and Humanities—
- #101Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology#2
- #13Computer Science—
- #90Engineering—
- #194Environmental Science—
- —Immunology and Microbiology#15
- #61Medicine#412
- —Neuroscience#4
- #15Psychology—
- #27Social Sciences—
Standing is the percentile of world rank within each field, 2022–now; the printed number is the rank itself. A dash means the field is too small there to rank. How sides are compared.
Where does each put its research?
Not who is better, but what each side chooses to work on. A country or institution that puts twice the world’s share of its research into a field sits at 2×, whatever its size.
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance1.2× 0.0×
- Business, Management and Accounting0.8× 0.0×
- Social Sciences1.0× 0.0×
- Computer Science1.5× 0.1×
- Health Professions0.8× 0.1×
- Dentistry0.6× 0.1×
- Mathematics1.3× 0.1×
- Arts and Humanities0.8× 0.1×
- Psychology1.9× 0.3×
- Engineering0.8× 0.1×
- Earth and Planetary Sciences1.2× 0.2×
- Decision Sciences1.1× 0.2×
- Physics and Astronomy1.1× 0.3×
- Materials Science0.6× 0.4×
- Environmental Science0.7× 0.4×
- Chemical Engineering0.6× 0.4×
- Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics0.8× 0.6×
- Medicine1.2× 0.9×
- Nursing0.8× 0.8×
- Veterinary0.2× 0.2×
- Energy0.6× 0.6×
- Chemistry0.6× 0.8×
- Neuroscience1.3× 6.3×
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences0.2× 1.4×
- Immunology and Microbiology1.0× 6.4×
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology1.1× 9.0×
Location quotient in 2022–now: the share of each side’s research in the field over the world’s share. 1× is the world’s balance; the axis runs from a quarter of it to four times. Fields where Chinese University of Hong Kong leans further are at the top, Howard Hughes Medical Institute’s at the bottom. How research profiles are compared.
How has their output grown?
Fractional works per year. The latest, partial year is left off.
Which publishes more research, Chinese University of Hong Kong or Howard Hughes Medical Institute?
Chinese University of Hong Kong publishes 8.6× as much research as Howard Hughes Medical Institute in 2022–now (14k against 1.7k fractional works).
Whose research has more impact, Chinese University of Hong Kong or Howard Hughes Medical Institute?
49.8% of Howard Hughes Medical Institute's research reaches the world's top 10% most cited, against 29.1% for Chinese University of Hong Kong.