Dalian University of Technology vs Howard Hughes Medical Institute
On research quality in 2022–now, Dalian University of Technology ranks #65 in the world and Howard Hughes Medical Institute #68, of 28,054 institutions. Dalian University of Technology stands higher in 9 of the 14 fields both publish in, Howard Hughes Medical Institute in 5.
Research profiles alike: 0.03different shapes of research, whatever their size. How it is measured
Dalian University of Technology
- World rank, 2022–now
- #65
- #273 all time
- Works, 2022–now
- 20k
- fractional
- Top-10% rate
- 23.0%
- share of its work among the world’s most cited
- Open access
- 22%
- of its works free to read
Strongest relative focus: Computational Mechanics, Mechanics of Materials, Process Chemistry and Technology.
Howard Hughes Medical Institute
- World rank, 2022–now
- #68
- #15 all time
- Works, 2022–now
- 1.7k
- fractional
- Top-10% rate
- 49.8%
- share of its work among the world’s most cited
- Open access
- 63%
- of its works free to read
Strongest relative focus: Aging, Structural Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience.
Who leads in each field?
Dalian University of Technology stands higher in 9 of 14 fields, Howard Hughes Medical Institute in 5. Each bar is that side’s standing among all institutions ranked in the field: the full bar is first place.
- —Agricultural and Biological Sciences#444
- —Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology#2
- #52Business, Management and Accounting—
- #14Chemical Engineering—
- #56Chemistry—
- #51Computer Science—
- #109Economics, Econometrics and Finance—
- #43Energy—
- #24Engineering—
- #54Environmental Science—
- —Immunology and Microbiology#15
- #36Materials Science—
- —Medicine#412
- —Neuroscience#4
Standing is the percentile of world rank within each field, 2022–now; the printed number is the rank itself. A dash means the field is too small there to rank. How sides are compared.
Where does each put its research?
Not who is better, but what each side chooses to work on. A country or institution that puts twice the world’s share of its research into a field sits at 2×, whatever its size.
- Engineering3.3× 0.1×
- Business, Management and Accounting0.4× 0.0×
- Computer Science1.5× 0.1×
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance0.4× 0.0×
- Chemical Engineering4.2× 0.4×
- Earth and Planetary Sciences1.3× 0.2×
- Materials Science2.6× 0.4×
- Mathematics0.9× 0.1×
- Decision Sciences1.3× 0.2×
- Energy2.4× 0.6×
- Social Sciences0.1× 0.0×
- Physics and Astronomy1.1× 0.3×
- Health Professions0.1× 0.1×
- Environmental Science1.1× 0.4×
- Chemistry1.8× 0.8×
- Dentistry0.1× 0.1×
- Psychology0.2× 0.3×
- Arts and Humanities0.1× 0.1×
- Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics0.4× 0.6×
- Veterinary0.1× 0.2×
- Nursing0.1× 0.8×
- Medicine0.1× 0.9×
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences0.1× 1.4×
- Neuroscience0.4× 6.3×
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology0.4× 9.0×
- Immunology and Microbiology0.1× 6.4×
Location quotient in 2022–now: the share of each side’s research in the field over the world’s share. 1× is the world’s balance; the axis runs from a quarter of it to four times. Fields where Dalian University of Technology leans further are at the top, Howard Hughes Medical Institute’s at the bottom. How research profiles are compared.
How has their output grown?
Fractional works per year. The latest, partial year is left off.
Which publishes more research, Dalian University of Technology or Howard Hughes Medical Institute?
Dalian University of Technology publishes 11.7× as much research as Howard Hughes Medical Institute in 2022–now (20k against 1.7k fractional works).
Whose research has more impact, Dalian University of Technology or Howard Hughes Medical Institute?
49.8% of Howard Hughes Medical Institute's research reaches the world's top 10% most cited, against 23.0% for Dalian University of Technology.