- World rank, all time
- #33,355 of 42,892
- Rank in Belgium
- #222 of 267
- Research works
- 139 ▲ 40% vs 2013–17
- Citations
- 3.8k 27.4 per fractional work
- Top-10% rate
- 11.6% record average 16.5%
- Open access
- 46% world 28%
Field profile
Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.
Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics, 6.1×. Every wedge is a field page.
- Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics 6.1×
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3.6×
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3.6×
- Immunology and Microbiology 2.7×
- Medicine 2.1×
- Mathematics 2.0×
- Nursing 1.4×
- Business, Management and Accounting 0.9×
- Health Professions 0.9×
- Social Sciences 0.8×
- Chemistry 0.7×
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences 0.5×
- Neuroscience 0.5×
- Materials Science 0.3×
- Decision Sciences 0.2×
- Environmental Science 0.2×
- Arts and Humanities 0.1×
- Computer Science 0.1×
- Engineering 0.1×
- Psychology 0.0×
Who are the top researchers at Anticancer Fund?
Ranked on the composite score, Gauthier Bouche and Sigismund Neukomm lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Anticancer Fund.
- 1 Gauthier Bouche Belgium · #822,128 worldwide 7 citations · 15 works
- 2 Sigismund Neukomm Belgium · #1,054,563 worldwide 9 citations · 36 works
Which keywords describe research at Anticancer Fund?
By fractional works in 2022–2025, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Clinical Trials, Cancer Therapy, Chemotherapy, Cancer, Quality of Life, Clinical Practice Guidelines, Geodesy and Map Projections.
- Geodesy
- Chemotherapy
- Cancer Therapy
- Cancer
- Epidemiology
- Clinical Trials
- Quality of Life
- Clinical Practice Guidelines
- Map Projections
Size is fractional works in 2022–2025 in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 9 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.
All 9 words, with their numbers
- Epidemiology2▲ 1.58×9 topics
- Cancer2▲ 4.6×12 topics
- Clinical Trials2▲ 8.7×8 topics
- Cancer Therapy1▲ 9.4×8 topics
- Quality of Life1▲ 4.0×4 topics
- Chemotherapy1▲ 7.5×9 topics
- Clinical Practice Guidelines1▲ 7.7×5 topics
- Geodesy1▲ 275×1 topic
- Map Projections1▲ 665×1 topic
Which research topics does Anticancer Fund publish most on?
By volume in 2022–2025: Historical Geography and Cartography, Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life, Ethics in Clinical Research and Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer.
Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.
- 1 Historical Geography and Cartography Geography, Planning and Development 1 works
- 2 Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life Economics and Econometrics 1 works
- 3 Ethics in Clinical Research Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 1 works
- 4 Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer Economics and Econometrics 1 works
- 5 Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy Economics and Econometrics 0 works
- 6 Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials Statistics and Probability 0 works
- 7 Biomedical Ethics and Regulation Physiology 0 works
- 8 Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 0 works
- 9 Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities Biochemistry 0 works
- 10 Cancer, Lipids, and Metabolism Cancer Research 0 works
How open and international is its research?
Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.
World: 28% of research is openly available.
World: 19% is written across borders.
How has Anticancer Fund's research output changed?
Output in 2018–2022 was 40% higher than in 2013–2017.
The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Other research institutions in Grimbergen
Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.