Australian Law Reform Commission
In research, Australian Law Reform Commission stands highest in Social Sciences (#7,706 of 10,206 worldwide) and Social Sciences (#13,315 of 16,945 worldwide), over all time.
- World rank, all time
- #40,114 of 42,892
- Rank in Australia
- #647 of 656
- Research works
- 229 ▲ 10% vs 2013–17
- Citations
- 1.2k 5.4 per fractional work
- Top-10% rate
- 27.2% record average 16.5%
- Open access
- 18% world 28%
What is Australian Law Reform Commission known for in research?
The fields where it stands highest, over all time, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.
| Field | World rank | Where that sits | Top-10% rate | Works |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Social SciencesField | #7,706 of 10,206 | 23.6% | 131 | |
| Social SciencesDomain | #13,315 of 16,945 | 21.4% | 177 |
Each strip is that field’s whole ranked pool, with the notch where Australian Law Reform Commission sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no world mark, because the world rate differs by field (from about 6% to 21% in this record).
Field profile
Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.
Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Economics, Econometrics and Finance, 4.0×. Every wedge is a field page.
Who are the top researchers at Australian Law Reform Commission?
Ranked on the composite score, Ruth SoRelle lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Australian Law Reform Commission.
- 1 Ruth SoRelle Australia · #1,057,365 worldwide 52 citations · 210 works
Which keywords describe research at Australian Law Reform Commission?
By fractional works in all years, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Human Rights, Property Rights, Globalization, Contract Law, Legal History, Equity, European Union and Corrective Justice.
- Democracy
- Welfare Rights Advice
- Equality
- Mass Incarceration
- Gender Differences
- Visual Jurisprudence
- Legal Semiotics
- Immigration
- Regulation
- Social Inequality
- Constitutionalism
- Federalism
- Risk Factors
- Public Opinion
- Criminal Justice
- Remedies
- European Union
- Legal History
- Contract Law
- Globalization
- Human Rights
- Property Rights
- Mental Health
- Equity
- Corrective Justice
- Psychological Impact
- Legal Education
- International Law
- Judicial Review
- Global Governance
- Resilience
- Cultural Diplomacy
- Access to Justice
- Jurisdiction Agreements
- Private International Law
- Ethical Considerations
- Health Impacts
- Prison System
- Professionalism
- Consumer Protection
Size is fractional works in all years in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Human Rights36▲ 18×35 topics
- Globalization18▲ 4.2×21 topics
- Property Rights15▲ 55×5 topics
- Contract Law13▲ 139×2 topics
- Mental Health12▲ 4.6×15 topics
- Legal History12▲ 121×2 topics
- Equity11▲ 105×2 topics
- European Union11▲ 20×9 topics
- Corrective Justice11▲ 193×1 topic
- Remedies11▲ 193×1 topic
- Psychological Impact10▲ 21×6 topics
- Criminal Justice10▲ 28×6 topics
- Legal Education10▲ 66×3 topics
- Public Opinion9▲ 22×4 topics
- International Law9▲ 14×15 topics
- Risk Factors8▲ 3.5×8 topics
- Judicial Review8▲ 31×4 topics
- Federalism8▲ 30×3 topics
- Global Governance7▲ 15×9 topics
- Constitutionalism7▲ 28×5 topics
- Resilience7▲ 7.8×7 topics
- Social Inequality7▲ 14×4 topics
- Cultural Diplomacy7▲ 44×3 topics
- Regulation7▲ 4.8×6 topics
- Access to Justice7▲ 89×2 topics
- Immigration7▲ 24×4 topics
- Jurisdiction Agreements6▲ 155×1 topic
- Legal Semiotics6▲ 119×1 topic
- Private International Law6▲ 155×1 topic
- Visual Jurisprudence6▲ 119×1 topic
- Ethical Considerations6▲ 8.3×7 topics
- Gender Differences6▲ 8.7×5 topics
- Health Impacts6▲ 41×2 topics
- Mass Incarceration6▲ 90×1 topic
- Prison System6▲ 50×1 topic
- Equality6▲ 35×5 topics
- Professionalism6▲ 20×1 topic
- Welfare Rights Advice6▲ 102×1 topic
- Consumer Protection6▲ 51×3 topics
- Democracy6▲ 6.6×7 topics
Which research topics does Australian Law Reform Commission publish most on?
By volume in 2022–2025: Public Administration in Developing Nations, Global Financial Regulation and Crises, Freedom of Expression and Defamation and Commonwealth, Australian Politics and Federalism.
Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.
- 1 Public Administration in Developing Nations Political Science and International Relations 1 works
- 2 Global Financial Regulation and Crises Finance 1 works
- 3 Freedom of Expression and Defamation Law 0 works
- 4 Commonwealth, Australian Politics and Federalism Political Science and International Relations 0 works
- 5 Libraries, Manuscripts, and Books History 0 works
- 6 Reproductive Health and Technologies Reproductive Medicine 0 works
- 7 Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes General Health Professions 0 works
- 8 Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies Sociology and Political Science 0 works
- 9 Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health Clinical Psychology 0 works
- 10 Law in Society and Culture Law 0 works
How open and international is its research?
Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.
World: 28% of research is openly available.
World: 19% is written across borders.
How has Australian Law Reform Commission's research output changed?
Output in 2018–2022 was 10% higher than in 2013–2017.
The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Other research institutions in Sydney
- The University of Sydney
- UNSW Sydney
- Macquarie University
- University of Technology Sydney
- Royal Prince Alfred Hospital
- Westmead Hospital
- Prince of Wales Hospital
- Children's Hospital at Westmead
Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.