Science Explorer Interactive view Map

Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health

Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health is a research topic within Clinical Psychology. Science Explorer counts 36k research works in it since 1950. 17.2% of them reached the world's top 10% most cited for their field and year.

This cluster of papers focuses on the psychological impact of bereavement and grief, particularly on complicated grief, prolonged grief disorder, and traumatic grief. It explores the prevalence, predictors, treatment, and long-term effects of complicated grief, as well as the resilience and mental health outcomes of individuals experiencing bereavement. The cluster also delves into the unique challenges of suicide bereavement and parental loss.

  • Complicated Grief
  • Bereavement
  • Prolonged Grief Disorder
  • Mental Health
  • Traumatic Grief
  • Psychological Impact
  • Treatment
  • Resilience
  • Suicide Bereavement
  • Parental Loss
Research works
36k
fractional, since 1950
In the world top 10%
6.1k
per year above
Top-10% rate
17.2%
share of its works in the world top 10%
Growth, 2013–17 → 2018–22
+38%
the tick is no change

Which countries lead Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health research?

By volume, the United States and the United Kingdom publish the most (1.9k and 838 works in 2022–2025).

By volume, 2022–2025

  1. 1 United States 1.9k works
  2. 2 United Kingdom 838 works
  3. 3 Australia 375 works
  4. 4 Brazil 289 works
  5. 5 Canada 283 works
  6. 6 China 264 works
  7. 7 Türkiye 258 works
  8. 8 India 233 works
  9. 9 Germany 184 works
  10. 10 Indonesia 163 works

How concentrated that is

The same countries as shares of everything the list above accounts for. A node where two countries do two thirds of the work and one spread evenly across twelve read alike as a ranking and not at all alike here.

United States: 40.0%United Kingdom: 17.4%Australia: 7.8%Brazil: 6.0%6 others listed: 28.8%40%largest
United States1,924 · 40.0%United Kingdom838 · 17.4%Australia375 · 7.8%Brazil289 · 6.0%6 others listed1,387 · 28.8%

Shares of the rows listed above, not of the whole node.

Which institutions lead Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health research?

By volume in 2022–2025, The University of Melbourne publishes the most Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health research, followed by University College London and University of Edinburgh.

By volume, 2022–2025

  1. 1 The University of MelbourneAustralia 26 works
  2. 2 University College LondonUnited Kingdom 24 works
  3. 3 University of EdinburghUnited Kingdom 24 works
  4. 4 University of TorontoCanada 23 works
  5. 5 Monash UniversityAustralia 22 works
  6. 6 Sapienza University of RomeItaly 22 works
  7. 7 Bar-Ilan UniversityIsrael 21 works
  8. 8 University of ManchesterUnited Kingdom 20 works
  9. 9 University of North Carolina at Chapel HillUnited States 20 works
  10. 10 Harvard UniversityUnited States 20 works

Where is Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health research done?

The largest centres of Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health research in 2022–2025 are London (United Kingdom), New York (United States), Melbourne (Australia) and Boston (United States). Among places with at least 20 works in it, it is an unusually large share of all research in Belfast.

Largest cities, 2022–2025

  1. 1 London United Kingdom 211 works
  2. 2 New York United States 103 works
  3. 3 Melbourne Australia 86 works
  4. 4 Boston United States 61 works
  5. 5 Sydney Australia 60 works
  6. 6 Toronto Canada 56 works
  7. 7 Istanbul Türkiye 53 works
  8. 8 Tehran Iran 50 works
  9. 9 Los Angeles United States 47 works
  10. 10 Brisbane Australia 43 works

Where it is the local speciality

  1. BelfastGB · 26.7 works9.1×
← less than its size predictsmore →

Location quotient: how much more of its research is in Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health than the world average.

See Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health on the map

Where is the best place to study Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health?

Among universities, judged by research, Bar-Ilan University, University of Humanistic Studies and University of Groningen score highest, combining excellence, specialisation, size, growth and international reach. Research strength is one signal when choosing where to study; it does not measure teaching.

0%20%40%mean 23.03%fractional works in this node (log) →share in the world top 10% →Bar-Ilan University: 22, 19.8%University of Humanistic Studies: 10, 21.6%University of Groningen: 12, 47.4%University of Haifa: 19, 15.1%University of Ulster: 12, 28.2%Ariel University: 11, 24.2%Queen's University Belfast: 17, 20.0%Roger Williams University: 17, 14.0%University College London: 24, 28.6%The Open University: 14, 11.4%University of Gronin…University of Humani…Bar-Ilan UniversityUniversity of Haifa
above the meannear itbelow it

One dot per university in the table below. The upper left is the interesting corner: small places doing unusually strong work.

#UniversityScoreTop 10%SpecialisationWorksGrowth
1 Bar-Ilan UniversityIsrael 58.619.8%11.8×22 -8.2%
2 University of Humanistic StudiesNetherlands 58.021.6%117.5×10 +208.7%
3 University of GroningenNetherlands 57.647.4%3.4×12 +92.0%
4 University of HaifaIsrael 57.215.1%12.4×19 +49.0%
5 University of UlsterUnited Kingdom 56.828.2%11.2×12 -10.7%
6 Ariel UniversityIsrael 55.124.2%12.4×11 +82.7%
7 Queen's University BelfastUnited Kingdom 53.520.0%7.8×17 +7.3%
8 Roger Williams UniversityUnited States 52.914.0%232.0×17
9 University College LondonUnited Kingdom 52.428.6%2.5×24 +41.9%
10 The Open UniversityUnited Kingdom 51.611.4%13.4×14 +81.9%

Universities only. Score blends excellence (30%), specialisation (25%), size (20%), growth (15%) and international reach (10%), 2015–2022; growth compares 2010–14 with 2015–19.

Is Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health research growing?

Output in 2018–2022 was 38% higher than in 2013–2017, peaking in 2024. The fastest-growing topics are Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health.

19801990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Which topics inside it are moving

Growth and decline on one axis around a shared zero. Two lists side by side hide the thing that matters: whether the growth dwarfs the decline, or the other way round.