Center for Independent Living
In research, Center for Independent Living stands highest in Social Sciences (#8,366 of 16,945 worldwide), Health Sciences (#11,029 of 20,462 worldwide) and Social Sciences (#7,809 of 10,206 worldwide), over all time.
- World rank, 2022–2025
- #25,052 of 28,054 · #25,017 all time
- Rank in United States
- #3,777 of 4,192
- Research works
- 622 ▲ 32% vs 2013–17
- Citations
- 6.3k 10.2 per fractional work
- Top-10% rate
- 8.5% record average 16.5%
- Open access
- 34% world 28%
What is Center for Independent Living known for in research?
The fields where it stands highest, over all time, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.
| Field | World rank | Where that sits | Top-10% rate | Works |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Social SciencesDomain | #8,366 of 16,945 | 14.8% | 347 | |
| Health SciencesDomain | #11,029 of 20,462 | 14.2% | 150 | |
| Social SciencesField | #7,809 of 10,206 | 14.3% | 183 |
Each strip is that field’s whole ranked pool, with the notch where Center for Independent Living sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no world mark, because the world rate differs by field (from about 6% to 21% in this record).
Field profile
Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.
Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Psychology, 4.5×. Every wedge is a field page.
- Psychology 4.5×
- Arts and Humanities 3.0×
- Health Professions 2.9×
- Social Sciences 2.1×
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1.7×
- Decision Sciences 1.4×
- Environmental Science 1.0×
- Medicine 1.0×
- Nursing 0.9×
- Business, Management and Accounting 0.8×
- Physics and Astronomy 0.8×
- Earth and Planetary Sciences 0.7×
- Dentistry 0.6×
- Neuroscience 0.5×
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences 0.3×
- Veterinary 0.3×
- Computer Science 0.3×
- Engineering 0.2×
- Energy 0.2×
- Materials Science 0.1×
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 0.1×
- Immunology and Microbiology 0.0×
- Chemistry 0.0×
Who are the top researchers at Center for Independent Living?
Ranked on the composite score, Bernard Brizay, Pierre‐Alain Monnard and Tejas Patel lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Center for Independent Living.
- 1 Bernard Brizay United States · #503,464 worldwide 0 citations · 21 works
- 2 Pierre‐Alain Monnard United States · #743,622 worldwide 89 citations · 19 works
- 3 Tejas Patel United States · #1,006,479 worldwide 70 citations · 32 works
- 4 Yoshiki Ueoka United States · #1,619,228 worldwide 0 citations · 20 works
Which keywords describe research at Center for Independent Living?
By fractional works in 2022–2025, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Qualitative Research, Pedagogy, Education, Ethics, Social Sciences, Embodiment, Tacit Knowledge and Ethical Guidelines.
- Global South
- Inclusion
- Race
- Intersectionality
- Quantitative Methods
- Medical Education
- Discourse Analysis
- Health Promotion
- Learning
- Identity
- Gender Studies
- Mental Health
- Family Dynamics
- Phenomenology
- Quality of Life
- Ethical Guidelines
- Healthcare
- Social Sciences
- Pedagogy
- Education
- Qualitative Research
- Epidemiology
- Ethics
- Embodiment
- Tacit Knowledge
- Interactional Expertise
- Public Health
- Communication
- Work Environment
- Globalization
- Physical Activity
- Evidence-Based Practice
- Social Justice
- Feminism
- Health Equity
- Methodology
- Special Education
- Functional Recovery
- Clinical Practice
- Accessibility
Size is fractional works in 2022–2025 in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Qualitative Research10▲ 10×13 topics
- Education8▲ 4.5×17 topics
- Epidemiology7▲ 1.58×28 topics
- Pedagogy7▲ 13×6 topics
- Ethics6▲ 11×6 topics
- Social Sciences6▲ 39×3 topics
- Embodiment6▲ 29×4 topics
- Healthcare5▲ 4.5×10 topics
- Tacit Knowledge5▲ 102×2 topics
- Ethical Guidelines5▲ 82×1 topic
- Interactional Expertise5▲ 398×1 topic
- Quality of Life5▲ 3.1×17 topics
- Public Health5▲ 3.0×17 topics
- Phenomenology4▲ 36×2 topics
- Communication4▲ 12×4 topics
- Family Dynamics4▲ 28×1 topic
- Work Environment4▲ 184×1 topic
- Mental Health4▲ 2.3×15 topics
- Globalization3▲ 1.57×13 topics
- Gender Studies3▲ 18×3 topics
- Physical Activity3▲ 5.7×5 topics
- Identity3▲ 3.8×9 topics
- Evidence-Based Practice3▲ 19×5 topics
- Learning2▲ 6.9×2 topics
- Social Justice2▲ 3.4×7 topics
- Health Promotion2▲ 6.1×6 topics
- Feminism2▲ 6.6×8 topics
- Discourse Analysis2▲ 7.1×2 topics
- Health Equity2▲ 6.6×5 topics
- Medical Education2▲ 6.8×5 topics
- Methodology2▲ 37×1 topic
- Quantitative Methods2▲ 121×1 topic
- Special Education2▲ 31×2 topics
- Intersectionality2▲ 9.2×4 topics
- Functional Recovery2▲ 10×3 topics
- Race2▲ 13×5 topics
- Clinical Practice2▲ 9.4×4 topics
- Inclusion2▲ 9.7×3 topics
- Accessibility1▲ 15×2 topics
- Global South1▲ 22×3 topics
Which research topics does Center for Independent Living publish most on?
By volume in 2022–2025: Education, Healthcare and Sociology Research, Research in Social Sciences, Social and Educational Sciences and Disability Rights and Representation.
Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.
- 1 Education, Healthcare and Sociology Research Social Psychology 5 works
- 2 Research in Social Sciences Education 4 works
- 3 Social and Educational Sciences Education 2 works
- 4 Disability Rights and Representation Safety Research 1 works
- 5 Evaluation and Performance Assessment Management Science and Operations Research 1 works
- 6 Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life Economics and Econometrics 1 works
- 7 Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders Psychiatry and Mental health 1 works
- 8 Coaching Methods and Impact Applied Psychology 1 works
- 9 Poetry Analysis and Criticism Literature and Literary Theory 1 works
- 10 Historical Astronomy and Related Studies Astronomy and Astrophysics 1 works
How open and international is its research?
Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.
World: 28% of research is openly available.
World: 19% is written across borders.
How has Center for Independent Living's research output changed?
Output in 2018–2022 was 32% higher than in 2013–2017.
The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Other research institutions in Berkeley
- University of California, Berkeley
- Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
- Neurobehavioral Systems
- Mathematical Sciences Research Institute
- Plant (United States)
- Department of Health Services
- Museum of Vertebrate Zoology
- International Computer Science Institute
Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.