Science Explorer Back to mapMap
Discussion
Research facility · Warsaw · Poland

Central Laboratory for Radiological Protection

In research, Central Laboratory for Radiological Protection stands highest in Physical Sciences (#13,665 of 17,446 worldwide), over all time.

clor.waw.plROR OpenAlex
World rank, all time
#22,891
of 34,923
Rank in Poland
#280
of 436
Research works
273
▲ 49% vs 2018-21
Citations
2.3k
8.4 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
7.5%
all institutions 10.0%
vs its own fields
0.85×
1.00× is exactly expected
Open access
25%
world 40%
International
9%
world 18%
Central Laboratory for Radiological Protection

What is Central Laboratory for Radiological Protection known for in research?

The fields where it stands highest, over all time, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.

FieldWorld rankWhere that sitsTop-10% rateWorks
Physical SciencesDomain #13,665 of 17,446 6.3%138

Each strip is that field's whole ranked pool, with the notch where Central Laboratory for Radiological Protection sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no average mark, because the average differs by field (from about 6% in Dentistry to 21% in Economics).

Which fields of science does Central Laboratory for Radiological Protection work in?

In 2022-now, 60% of research at Central Laboratory for Radiological Protection is in Physical Sciences, 26% in Health Sciences. Its largest fields are Health Professions (20%), Environmental Science (18%), Physics and Astronomy (17%). It does 1.4× the world's share of Physical Sciences.

Physical Sciences: 17 fractional works · 59.9% of its workEnvironmental Science: 5 fractional works · 18.2% of its workGlobal and Planetary Change: 3 fractional works · 11.8% of its workEnvironmental Engineering: 1 fractional works · 2.6% of its workWater Science and Technology: 1 fractional works · 2.1% of its workPollution: 0 fractional works · 1.1% of its workHealth, Toxicology and Mutagenesis: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workPhysics and Astronomy: 5 fractional works · 17.4% of its workRadiation: 4 fractional works · 15.7% of its workNuclear and High Energy Physics: 0 fractional works · 1.2% of its workInstrumentation: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workEngineering: 4 fractional works · 15.2% of its workSafety, Risk, Reliability and Quality: 2 fractional works · 5.8% of its workMechanical Engineering: 1 fractional works · 3.1% of its workAerospace Engineering: 1 fractional works · 2.4% of its workBiomedical Engineering: 1 fractional works · 2.0% of its workCivil and Structural Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workIndustrial and Manufacturing Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workElectrical and Electronic Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workMaterials Science: 1 fractional works · 5.1% of its workMaterials Chemistry: 1 fractional works · 5.1% of its workEarth and Planetary Sciences: 1 fractional works · 3.1% of its workGeochemistry and Petrology: 1 fractional works · 2.3% of its workPaleontology: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workGeophysics: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workChemistry: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workSpectroscopy: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workEnergy: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workRenewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workHealth Sciences: 7 fractional works · 26.3% of its workHealth Professions: 6 fractional works · 19.9% of its workRadiological and Ultrasound Technology: 6 fractional works · 19.9% of its workMedicine: 2 fractional works · 5.9% of its workRadiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging: 1 fractional works · 5.1% of its workPublic Health, Environmental and Occupational Health: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workPulmonary and Respiratory Medicine: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.0% of its workNursing: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workNutrition and Dietetics: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workSocial Sciences: 3 fractional works · 11.5% of its workSocial Sciences: 1 fractional works · 3.9% of its workAnthropology: 0 fractional works · 1.2% of its workPolitical Science and International Relations: 0 fractional works · 1.2% of its workLaw: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workSociology and Political Science: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workBusiness, Management and Accounting: 1 fractional works · 3.5% of its workStrategy and Management: 1 fractional works · 3.5% of its workDecision Sciences: 1 fractional works · 2.9% of its workStatistics, Probability and Uncertainty: 1 fractional works · 2.9% of its workArts and Humanities: 0 fractional works · 1.2% of its workPhilosophy: 0 fractional works · 1.2% of its workLife Sciences: 1 fractional works · 2.3% of its workAgricultural and Biological Sciences: 0 fractional works · 1.2% of its workPlant Science: 0 fractional works · 1.2% of its workBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workGenetics: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workMolecular Biology: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workNeuroscience: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workNeurology: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workImmunology and Microbiology: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workImmunology: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workALL ITS WORKCentralLaboratory for…28fractional works, 2022-now
Life Sciences2%Physical Sciences60%Health Sciences26%Social Sciences12%

Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields, their subfields. Size is fractional works in 2022-now. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.

Its 4 domains and 18 fields, with their numbers
    1. Environmental Science518.2%
    2. Physics and Astronomy517.4%
    3. Engineering415.2%
    4. Materials Science15.1%
    5. Earth and Planetary Sciences13.1%
    6. Chemistry00.6%
    7. Energy00.3%
    1. Health Professions619.9%
    2. Medicine25.9%
    3. Nursing00.4%
    1. Social Sciences13.9%
    2. Business, Management and Accounting13.5%
    3. Decision Sciences12.9%
    4. Arts and Humanities01.2%
    1. Agricultural and Biological Sciences01.2%
    2. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology00.5%
    3. Neuroscience00.4%
    4. Immunology and Microbiology00.2%
All of science, and how each field's share has moved since 1950: the Science domain explorer

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

Agricultural and Biological Sciences: 0.25× its world share, 0 worksAgricultural and Bio…Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 0.09× its world share, 0 worksBiochemistry, Geneti…Immunology and Microbiology: 0.23× its world share, 0 worksImmunology and Micro…Neuroscience: 0.27× its world share, 0 worksNeuroscienceChemistry: 0.37× its world share, 0 worksChemistryEarth and Planetary Sciences: 1.98× its world share, 1 worksEarth and Planetary …Energy: 0.32× its world share, 0 worksEnergyEngineering: 1.01× its world share, 4 worksEngineeringEnvironmental Science: 3.66× its world share, 5 worksEnvironmental ScienceMaterials Science: 1.48× its world share, 2 worksMaterials SciencePhysics and Astronomy: 7.83× its world share, 5 worksPhysics and AstronomyHealth Professions: 7.56× its world share, 6 worksHealth ProfessionsMedicine: 0.31× its world share, 2 worksMedicineNursing: 0.80× its world share, 0 worksNursingArts and Humanities: 0.41× its world share, 0 worksArts and HumanitiesBusiness, Management and Accounting: 1.09× its world share, 1 worksBusiness, Management…Decision Sciences: 3.03× its world share, 1 worksDecision SciencesSocial Sciences: 0.31× its world share, 1 worksSocial Sciences1×world share
more than its size predictsabout as predictedless

Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Physics and Astronomy, 7.8×. Every wedge is a field page.

All 18 fields, with their numbers
  1. Physics and Astronomy7.83×5 works
  2. Health Professions7.56×6 works
  3. Environmental Science3.66×5 works
  4. Decision Sciences3.03×1 works
  5. Earth and Planetary Sciences1.98×1 works
  6. Materials Science1.48×2 works
  7. Business, Management and Accounting1.09×1 works
  8. Engineering1.01×4 works
  9. Nursing0.80×0 works
  10. Arts and Humanities0.41×0 works
  11. Chemistry0.37×0 works
  12. Energy0.32×0 works
  13. Medicine0.31×2 works
  14. Social Sciences0.31×1 works
  15. Neuroscience0.27×0 works
  16. Agricultural and Biological Sciences0.25×0 works
  17. Immunology and Microbiology0.23×0 works
  18. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology0.09×0 works

Who are the top researchers at Central Laboratory for Radiological Protection?

Ranked on the quality score, J.W. Krzesniak, Krzysztof Isajenko and Zbigniew Jaworowski lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Central Laboratory for Radiological Protection.

  1. 1 J.W. Krzesniak Poland · #1,950,738 worldwide 215 citations · 22 works
  2. 2 Krzysztof Isajenko Poland · #2,663,650 worldwide 640 citations · 33 works
  3. 3 Zbigniew Jaworowski Poland · #3,305,964 worldwide 1.8k citations · 83 works
  4. 4 K. Mamont-Cieśla Poland · #3,720,513 worldwide 332 citations · 25 works
  5. 5 Maria Suplińska Poland · #3,748,547 worldwide 528 citations · 22 works
  6. 6 Pawel Krajewski Poland · #3,824,499 worldwide 876 citations · 58 works
  7. 7 Zofia Pietrzak-Flis Poland · #3,850,491 worldwide 622 citations · 38 works
  8. 8 B Gwiazdowski Poland · #4,162,531 worldwide 77 citations · 18 works
  9. 9 Stanisław Szmigielski Poland · #4,200,628 worldwide 564 citations · 43 works
  10. 10 Ludwika Kownacka Poland · #4,303,635 worldwide 228 citations · 17 works
All ranked researchers at Central Laboratory for Radiological Protection

What are the most cited papers from Central Laboratory for Radiological Protection?

The most cited paper from Central Laboratory for Radiological Protection is "A new progeroid syndrome reveals that genotoxic stress suppresses the somatotroph axis" (Laura J. Niedernhofer, George A. Garinis, Anja Raams et al., 2006), with 672 citations. Next come "Premature Aging in Mice Deficient in DNA Repair and Transcription" (549) and "Tracking of Airborne Radionuclides from the Damaged Fukushima Dai-Ichi Nuclear Reactors by European Networks" (374).

Most cited papers
#PaperReleasedCitations
1 A new progeroid syndrome reveals that genotoxic stress suppresses the somatotroph axis Laura J. Niedernhofer, George A. Garinis, Anja Raams et al. · Nature Dec 2006 672
2 Premature Aging in Mice Deficient in DNA Repair and Transcription Jan de Boer, Jaan‐Olle Andressoo, Jan de Wit et al. · Science 17 May 2002 549
3 Tracking of Airborne Radionuclides from the Damaged Fukushima Dai-Ichi Nuclear Reactors by European Networks Olivier Masson et al. · Environmental Science & Technology 2 Aug 2011 374
4 Radiation Risk and Ethics Zbigniew Jaworowski · Physics Today Sep 1999 104
5 Observations on the Chernobyl Disaster and LNT Zbigniew Jaworowski · Dose-Response Open access 28 Jan 2010 96
All 61 most cited papers, with filters and sorting

Which keywords describe research at Central Laboratory for Radiological Protection?

By fractional works in 2022-now, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Health Effects, Radionuclides, Ionizing Radiation, Environmental Impact, Toxicity, Lung Cancer, Radon and Environmental Impacts.

▲ more of its work than of the world's◆ about the world's share▼ less than the world's

Size is fractional works in 2022-now in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 23 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.

All 23 words, with their numbers
  1. Health Effects9▲ 52×3 topics
  2. Radionuclides9▲ 812×2 topics
  3. Ionizing Radiation7▲ 358×2 topics
  4. Environmental Impact7▲ 14×4 topics
  5. Toxicity6▲ 48×2 topics
  6. Lung Cancer6▲ 119×1 topic
  7. Radon6▲ 889×1 topic
  8. Environmental Impacts3▲ 43×2 topics
  9. Fukushima Daiichi3▲ 704×1 topic
  10. nuclear accident3▲ 704×1 topic
  11. Medical Imaging3▲ 19×2 topics
  12. Radiation Detection3▲ 222×2 topics
  13. Inorganic Scintillators3▲ 300×1 topic
  14. Scintillation Detectors3▲ 300×1 topic
  15. Nuclear Fuel2▲ 371×1 topic
  16. Radiation Protection2▲ 371×1 topic
  17. Computed Tomography1▲ 102×1 topic
  18. Radiation Exposure1▲ 46×1 topic
  19. Nuclear Graphite1▲ 203×1 topic
  20. Oxidation Behavior1▲ 69×1 topic
  21. Quality Assurance1▲ 24×2 topics
  22. Quality Management1▲ 25×1 topic
  23. Work Environment1▲ 199×1 topic

Which research topics does Central Laboratory for Radiological Protection publish most on?

By volume in 2022-now: Radioactivity and Radon Measurements, Radioactive contamination and transfer, Radiation Detection and Scintillator Technologies and Nuclear and radioactivity studies.

Radioactivity and Radon …6Radioactivity and Radon Measurements: 6 fractional worksRadioactive contamination and transfer: 3 fractional worksRadiation Detection and Scintillator Technologies: 3 fractional worksNuclear and radioactivit…2Nuclear and radioactivity studies: 2 fractional worksRadiation Dose and Imaging1Radiation Dose and Imaging: 1 fractional worksGraphite, nuclear techno…1Graphite, nuclear technology, radiation studies: 1 fractional worksManagement Systems and Quality Improvement: 1 fractional worksAir Quality Monitoring and Forecasting: 1 fractional worksScientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation: 1 fractional worksCalibration and Measurement Techniques: 1 fractional works
Radiological and Ultrasound TechnologyGlobal and Planetary ChangeRadiationSafety, Risk, Reliability and Quality6 others

Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.

  1. 1 Radioactivity and Radon Measurements Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 6 works
  2. 2 Radioactive contamination and transfer Global and Planetary Change 3 works
  3. 3 Radiation Detection and Scintillator Technologies Radiation 3 works
  4. 4 Nuclear and radioactivity studies Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality 2 works
  5. 5 Radiation Dose and Imaging Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 1 works
  6. 6 Graphite, nuclear technology, radiation studies Materials Chemistry 1 works
  7. 7 Management Systems and Quality Improvement Strategy and Management 1 works
  8. 8 Air Quality Monitoring and Forecasting Environmental Engineering 1 works
  9. 9 Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 1 works
  10. 10 Calibration and Measurement Techniques Aerospace Engineering 1 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available25.0%not open75.0%

World: 40% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors8.8%domestic only91.2%

World: 18% is written across borders.

How has Central Laboratory for Radiological Protection's research output changed?

Output in 2022-2025 was 49% higher than in 2018-2021.

still counting1990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Its share of all research

Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is Central Laboratory for Radiological Protection as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.00010% in 2024.

still counting0.0010%0.0020%0.0030%Central Laboratory for Radiological Protection0.00014% in 202519801990200020102020

Fractional works of Central Laboratory for Radiological Protection over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.

Other research institutions in Warsaw

All research institutions in Warsaw

Share Central Laboratory for Radiological Protection's ranking

Central Laboratory for Radiological Protection on Science Explorer

A card with Central Laboratory for Radiological Protection's standing and the fields it leads in, for a post or a slide. A link to this page previews as the same card.

Download the card

1200 × 630 PNG, sized for social posts, drawn from the latest snapshot.

Badges for a website1Each links back here and updates with every snapshot

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.

Discussion

Ask a question or share a note about Central Laboratory for Radiological Protection. Keep it to the research: no personal attacks, advertising or links. Any reader can report a post, which collapses it for everyone until it is opened.