- World rank, all time
- #40,417 of 42,892
- Rank in United Kingdom
- #2,155 of 2,253
- Research works
- 126 ▼ 43% vs 2013–17
- Citations
- 2.9k 23.2 per fractional work
- Top-10% rate
- 12.3% record average 16.5%
- Open access
- 32% world 28%
Field profile
Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.
Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Business, Management and Accounting, 4.1×. Every wedge is a field page.
- Business, Management and Accounting 4.1×
- Decision Sciences 2.7×
- Nursing 2.7×
- Environmental Science 2.4×
- Energy 1.9×
- Arts and Humanities 1.8×
- Social Sciences 1.8×
- Psychology 1.5×
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1.2×
- Health Professions 1.1×
- Engineering 1.0×
- Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics 0.9×
- Earth and Planetary Sciences 0.7×
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences 0.6×
- Medicine 0.5×
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 0.2×
- Physics and Astronomy 0.1×
- Computer Science 0.1×
Who are the top researchers at Council for At-Risk Academics?
Ranked on the composite score, Lieven De Smet lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Council for At-Risk Academics.
- 1 Lieven De Smet United Kingdom · #1,226,064 worldwide 6 citations · 19 works
Which keywords describe research at Council for At-Risk Academics?
By fractional works in all years, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Clinical Guidelines, Globalization, Healthcare Quality, Defensive Medicine, Malpractice Risk, Higher Education, Public Health and Environmental Impact Assessment.
- Psychology
- Genetic Characterization
- Professionalism
- No Net Loss
- Burnout
- Medical Education
- Politics
- Communication
- Risk Management
- Agricultural Change
- Ethics
- Rural Development
- Community Empowerment
- Democracy
- Environmental Impact Assessment
- Environmental Impact
- Education
- Climate Change
- Healthcare Quality
- Clinical Guidelines
- Globalization
- Sustainability
- Public Health
- Defensive Medicine
- Malpractice Risk
- Higher Education
- Neoliberalism
- Nationalism
- Learning Outcomes
- Neuroscience
- Pedagogy
- Reflective Practice
- Social Innovation
- Entrepreneurship
- Sustainability Assessment
- Biodiversity Offsets
- Empathy
- Patient Outcomes
- Academic Mobility
- Lifelong Learning
Size is fractional works in all years in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Globalization8▲ 3.4×18 topics
- Clinical Guidelines5▲ 14×3 topics
- Sustainability5▲ 2.3×17 topics
- Healthcare Quality5▲ 32×4 topics
- Public Health5▲ 2.8×12 topics
- Climate Change5▲ 1.38×18 topics
- Defensive Medicine4▲ 94×1 topic
- Education4▲ 2.4×12 topics
- Malpractice Risk4▲ 94×1 topic
- Environmental Impact3▲ 2.0×7 topics
- Higher Education3▲ 6.7×5 topics
- Environmental Impact Assessment3▲ 41×2 topics
- Neoliberalism3▲ 6.3×6 topics
- Democracy3▲ 5.8×6 topics
- Nationalism3▲ 3.7×6 topics
- Community Empowerment2▲ 6.1×2 topics
- Learning Outcomes2▲ 8.8×3 topics
- Rural Development2▲ 6.7×2 topics
- Neuroscience2▲ 6.0×5 topics
- Ethics2▲ 4.0×5 topics
- Pedagogy2▲ 5.3×3 topics
- Agricultural Change2▲ 96×1 topic
- Reflective Practice2▲ 9.7×5 topics
- Risk Management2▲ 5.0×4 topics
- Social Innovation2▲ 14×1 topic
- Communication2▲ 5.5×4 topics
- Entrepreneurship2▲ 5.8×4 topics
- Politics2▲ 5.8×6 topics
- Sustainability Assessment2▲ 15×2 topics
- Medical Education2▲ 6.4×5 topics
- Biodiversity Offsets2▲ 168×1 topic
- Burnout2▲ 15×2 topics
- Empathy2▲ 10×3 topics
- No Net Loss2▲ 168×1 topic
- Patient Outcomes2▲ 23×2 topics
- Professionalism2▲ 11×3 topics
- Academic Mobility2▲ 33×2 topics
- Genetic Characterization2▲ 23×2 topics
- Lifelong Learning2▲ 8.6×2 topics
- Psychology2▲ 9.7×2 topics
Which research topics does Council for At-Risk Academics publish most on?
By volume in 2022–2025: BIM and Construction Integration, Private Equity and Venture Capital, Linguistics and Education Research and Education Pedagogy and Practices.
Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.
- 1 BIM and Construction Integration Building and Construction 1 works
- 2 Private Equity and Venture Capital Accounting 1 works
- 3 Linguistics and Education Research Literature and Literary Theory 0 works
- 4 Education Pedagogy and Practices Education 0 works
- 5 European and Russian Geopolitical Military Strategies Political Science and International Relations 0 works
- 6 Islamic Finance and Banking Studies Accounting 0 works
- 7 Innovation and Socioeconomic Development Business and International Management 0 works
- 8 Environmental and Biological Research in Conflict Zones Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 0 works
- 9 War, Law, and Justice Political Science and International Relations 0 works
- 10 Microfinance and Financial Inclusion Economics and Econometrics 0 works
How open and international is its research?
Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.
World: 28% of research is openly available.
World: 19% is written across borders.
How has Council for At-Risk Academics's research output changed?
Output in 2018–2022 was 43% lower than in 2013–2017.
The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Other research institutions in London
- University College London
- Imperial College London
- King's College London
- Queen Mary University of London
- London School of Economics and Political Science
- University of London
- Brunel University of London
- London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.