Science Explorer Interactive view Map
University · Aarhus · Denmark

Danish Institute for Quality and Accreditation in Healthcare

Research works
97
▲ 90% vs 2013–17
Citations
377
3.9 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
4.2%
record average 16.5%
Open access
40%
world 28%

Not ranked overall: Danish Institute for Quality and Accreditation in Healthcare is under the volume floor below which an excellence rate is noise. Not ranked is not the same as ranked last.

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

Agricultural and Biological Sciences: 1.49× its world share, 1 worksAgricultural and Bio…Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 0.45× its world share, 0 worksBiochemistry, Geneti…Immunology and Microbiology: 0.85× its world share, 0 worksImmunology and Micro…Neuroscience: 4.97× its world share, 1 worksNeuroscienceComputer Science: 0.18× its world share, 0 worksComputer ScienceEarth and Planetary Sciences: 0.34× its world share, 0 worksEarth and Planetary …Environmental Science: 0.49× its world share, 0 worksEnvironmental ScienceMaterials Science: 0.15× its world share, 0 worksMaterials ScienceDentistry: 1.47× its world share, 0 worksDentistryHealth Professions: 5.80× its world share, 2 worksHealth ProfessionsMedicine: 1.63× its world share, 5 worksMedicineNursing: 0.62× its world share, 0 worksNursingArts and Humanities: 0.96× its world share, 0 worksArts and HumanitiesBusiness, Management and Accounting: 0.09× its world share, 0 worksBusiness, Management…Decision Sciences: 5.17× its world share, 1 worksDecision SciencesEconomics, Econometrics and Finance: 2.50× its world share, 1 worksEconomics, Econometr…Psychology: 1.82× its world share, 1 worksPsychologySocial Sciences: 0.80× its world share, 2 worksSocial Sciencesworld share
more than its size predictsabout as predictedless

Rings at 0.5×, and 2×. Widest outward: Health Professions, 5.8×. Every wedge is a field page.

Which keywords describe research at Danish Institute for Quality and Accreditation in Healthcare?

By fractional works in all years, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Quality of Life, Urinary Incontinence, Epidemiology, Clinical Guidelines, Healthcare Quality, Quality Improvement, Primary Care and Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia.

▲ more of its work than of the world’s◆ about the world’s share▼ less than the world’s

Size is fractional works in all years in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.

All 40 words, with their numbers
  1. Epidemiology8▲ 2.2×35 topics
  2. Quality of Life8▲ 6.2×21 topics
  3. Urinary Incontinence5▲ 52×2 topics
  4. Clinical Guidelines4▲ 14×5 topics
  5. Healthcare Quality4▲ 36×4 topics
  6. Quality Improvement4▲ 20×4 topics
  7. Primary Care4▲ 8.7×6 topics
  8. Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia3▲ 86×1 topic
  9. Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms3▲ 86×1 topic
  10. Patient Satisfaction3▲ 13×5 topics
  11. Patient Outcomes3▲ 52×2 topics
  12. Qualitative Research3▲ 5.5×6 topics
  13. Global Burden3▲ 5.2×5 topics
  14. Management3▲ 3.6×7 topics
  15. Guideline Development3▲ 93×1 topic
  16. Health Outcomes3▲ 12×4 topics
  17. Quality Assessment3▲ 14×1 topic
  18. Clinical Trials2▲ 4.1×8 topics
  19. Pedagogy2▲ 7.5×4 topics
  20. Job Satisfaction2▲ 9.1×6 topics
  21. Organizational Change2▲ 27×3 topics
  22. Rehabilitation2▲ 6.2×5 topics
  23. Chronic Disease2▲ 13×2 topics
  24. Respiratory2▲ 22×2 topics
  25. Ageing Population2▲ 53×1 topic
  26. Cost-effectiveness Analysis2▲ 27×1 topic
  27. Health Care Expenditure2▲ 53×1 topic
  28. Health Utility Measures2▲ 27×1 topic
  29. Social Sciences2▲ 13×2 topics
  30. Dental Caries2▲ 23×2 topics
  31. Health Promotion2▲ 6.7×7 topics
  32. Communication2▲ 6.5×3 topics
  33. Ethical Guidelines2▲ 34×2 topics
  34. Learning2▲ 9.5×2 topics
  35. Public Health Policy2▲ 11×2 topics
  36. Social Determinants2▲ 9.8×4 topics
  37. Social Science2▲ 35×2 topics
  38. Clinical Governance2▲ 119×1 topic
  39. Healthcare Accreditation2▲ 119×1 topic
  40. Methodology2▲ 33×1 topic

Which research topics does Danish Institute for Quality and Accreditation in Healthcare publish most on?

By volume in 2022–2025: Occupational Health and Safety Research, Stress Responses and Cortisol, Tryptophan and brain disorders and Electronic Health Records Systems.

  1. 1 Occupational Health and Safety Research Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 1 works
  2. 2 Stress Responses and Cortisol Behavioral Neuroscience 0 works
  3. 3 Tryptophan and brain disorders Biological Psychiatry 0 works
  4. 4 Electronic Health Records Systems Health Information Management 0 works
  5. 5 Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation Pharmacology 0 works
  6. 6 Medication Adherence and Compliance Family Practice 0 works
  7. 7 Data Quality and Management Management Science and Operations Research 0 works
  8. 8 Healthcare Policy and Management Economics and Econometrics 0 works
  9. 9 Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy Economics and Econometrics 0 works
  10. 10 Big Data Technologies and Applications Information Systems and Management 0 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available39.9%not open60.1%

World: 28% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors29.8%domestic only70.2%

World: 19% is written across borders.

How has Danish Institute for Quality and Accreditation in Healthcare's research output changed?

Output in 2018–2022 was 90% higher than in 2013–2017.

1990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Other research institutions in Aarhus

All research institutions in Aarhus

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.