Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS)
In research, Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) stands highest in Social Sciences (#9,863 of 16,945 worldwide), Computer Science (#6,708 of 7,020 worldwide) and Physical Sciences (#20,671 of 21,541 worldwide), over all time. Relative to its size it is most specialised in Computer Science — Computer Science is 4.8× its share of world research.
- World rank, 2022–2025
- #26,754 of 28,054 · #28,959 all time
- Rank in Netherlands
- #236 of 237
- Research works
- 523 ▼ 7% vs 2013–17
- Citations
- 7.1k 13.5 per fractional work
- Top-10% rate
- 10.0% record average 16.5%
- Open access
- 65% world 28%
What is Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) known for in research?
The fields where it stands highest, over all time, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.
| Field | World rank | Where that sits | Top-10% rate | Works |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Social SciencesDomain | #9,863 of 16,945 | 14.3% | 227 | |
| Computer ScienceField | #6,708 of 7,020 | 7.1% | 154 | |
| Physical SciencesDomain | #20,671 of 21,541 | 8.2% | 200 |
Each strip is that field’s whole ranked pool, with the notch where Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no world mark, because the world rate differs by field (from about 6% to 21% in this record).
What does Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) specialise in?
Where its research is concentrated relative to its size: Computer Science takes 4.8× the share of its output that it takes of world research.
- Computer ScienceField · 22.5 works4.8×
Location quotient, a volume reading rather than an impact one. It surfaces small, lopsided specialities.
Field profile
Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.
Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Decision Sciences, 7.6×. Every wedge is a field page.
- Decision Sciences 7.6×
- Computer Science 4.8×
- Veterinary 3.7×
- Arts and Humanities 1.6×
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1.5×
- Business, Management and Accounting 1.3×
- Social Sciences 1.1×
- Health Professions 0.7×
- Neuroscience 0.6×
- Environmental Science 0.6×
- Medicine 0.5×
- Physics and Astronomy 0.5×
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 0.5×
- Mathematics 0.5×
- Engineering 0.4×
- Psychology 0.4×
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences 0.4×
- Immunology and Microbiology 0.3×
- Earth and Planetary Sciences 0.3×
- Chemical Engineering 0.3×
Who are the top researchers at Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS)?
Ranked on the composite score, Peter Doorn, Andrea Scharnhorst and Vyacheslav Tykhonov lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS).
- 1 Peter Doorn Netherlands · #653,465 worldwide 3 citations · 26 works
- 2 Andrea Scharnhorst Netherlands · #1,067,313 worldwide 44 citations · 69 works
- 3 Vyacheslav Tykhonov Netherlands · #1,222,616 worldwide 0 citations · 15 works
- 4 Jan Harmsen Netherlands · #1,315,994 worldwide 2 citations · 23 works
- 5 Irena Vipavc Brvar Netherlands · #1,409,015 worldwide 0 citations · 83 works
Which keywords describe research at Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS)?
By fractional works in 2022–2025, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Digital Repositories, Data Sharing, Open Science, Scientific Data Management, Semantic Web, Linked Data, Data Integration and Bibliographic Framework.
- Resource Management
- Recessionary Shocks
- Information Studies
- Digital Communication
- Strategic Management
- Record Linkage
- Data Cleaning
- Mathematical Information Retrieval
- Open Access
- Scientific Workflows
- Cultural Heritage
- Artificial Intelligence
- RDF
- Grey Literature
- Sustainability
- Scientific Communication
- Bibliographic Framework
- Linked Data
- Scientific Data Management
- Data Sharing
- Digital Repositories
- Open Science
- Semantic Web
- Data Integration
- Resource Description and Access
- Big Data
- Workflow Management
- Ontology
- Research Information Systems
- Bioinformatics
- Reproducibility
- Information Retrieval
- Math Search
- Biodiversity Conservation
- Knowledge Management
- Natural Language Processing
- Cloud Robotics
- Heterogeneous Networks
- Internet of Robotic Things
- Regional Economic Resilience
Size is fractional works in 2022–2025 in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Digital Repositories10▲ 595×2 topics
- Data Sharing8▲ 493×2 topics
- Open Science7▲ 544×1 topic
- Scientific Data Management7▲ 544×1 topic
- Semantic Web6▲ 100×3 topics
- Linked Data5▲ 207×2 topics
- Data Integration4▲ 39×3 topics
- Bibliographic Framework3▲ 748×1 topic
- Resource Description and Access3▲ 748×1 topic
- Scientific Communication2▲ 211×2 topics
- Big Data2▲ 4.4×9 topics
- Sustainability2▲ 1.58×11 topics
- Workflow Management2▲ 50×2 topics
- Grey Literature2▲ 1138×1 topic
- Ontology2▲ 40×1 topic
- RDF2▲ 96×1 topic
- Research Information Systems2▲ 1138×1 topic
- Artificial Intelligence2▲ 2.3×7 topics
- Bioinformatics2▲ 27×2 topics
- Cultural Heritage2▲ 5.4×4 topics
- Reproducibility2▲ 84×1 topic
- Scientific Workflows2▲ 84×1 topic
- Information Retrieval2▲ 13×3 topics
- Open Access2▲ 29×2 topics
- Math Search2▲ 509×1 topic
- Mathematical Information Retrieval2▲ 509×1 topic
- Biodiversity Conservation1▲ 6.3×3 topics
- Data Cleaning1▲ 81×1 topic
- Knowledge Management1▲ 4.2×2 topics
- Record Linkage1▲ 81×1 topic
- Natural Language Processing1▲ 8.6×2 topics
- Strategic Management1▲ 12×2 topics
- Cloud Robotics1▲ 58×1 topic
- Digital Communication1▲ 23×1 topic
- Heterogeneous Networks1▲ 17×2 topics
- Information Studies1▲ 79×1 topic
- Internet of Robotic Things1▲ 58×1 topic
- Recessionary Shocks1▲ 130×1 topic
- Regional Economic Resilience1▲ 130×1 topic
- Resource Management1▲ 9.7×2 topics
Which research topics does Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) publish most on?
By volume in 2022–2025: Research Data Management Practices, Library Science and Information Systems, Optics and Image Analysis and Semantic Web and Ontologies.
Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.
- 1 Research Data Management Practices Information Systems 7 works
- 2 Library Science and Information Systems Information Systems 3 works
- 3 Optics and Image Analysis Management Information Systems 2 works
- 4 Semantic Web and Ontologies Artificial Intelligence 2 works
- 5 Scientific Computing and Data Management Information Systems and Management 2 works
- 6 Mathematics, Computing, and Information Processing Computational Theory and Mathematics 2 works
- 7 Data Quality and Management Management Science and Operations Research 1 works
- 8 Regional resilience and development Economics and Econometrics 1 works
- 9 Robotics and Automated Systems Control and Systems Engineering 1 works
- 10 Cultural Insights and Digital Impacts Computer Networks and Communications 1 works
How open and international is its research?
Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.
World: 28% of research is openly available.
World: 19% is written across borders.
How has Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS)'s research output changed?
Output in 2018–2022 was 7% lower than in 2013–2017.
The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Other research institutions in The Hague
- Shell (Netherlands)
- House of Representatives
- The Hague University of Applied Sciences
- Huygens Institute for History and Culture of the Netherlands
- Netherlands Interdisciplinary Demographic Institute
- Medisch Centrum Haaglanden
- Haga Hospital
- Netherlands Institute for Social Research
Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.