Science Explorer Back to mapMap
Nonprofit · Columbia · United States

EdVenture

Research works
93
▼ 35% vs 2018-21
Citations
449
4.8 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
8.8%
all institutions 10.0%
Open access
0%
world 40%
International
23%
world 18%

Not ranked overall: EdVenture is under the volume floor below which a citation excellence rate is noise. Not ranked is not the same as ranked last.

Which fields of science does EdVenture work in?

In all years, 97% of research at EdVenture is in Physical Sciences, 2% in Social Sciences. Its largest fields are Engineering (95%), Decision Sciences (2%), Chemistry (1%). It does 2.3× the world's share of Physical Sciences.

Physical Sciences: 90 fractional works · 97.2% of its workEngineering: 88 fractional works · 94.6% of its workOcean Engineering: 64 fractional works · 68.6% of its workMechanical Engineering: 16 fractional works · 17.2% of its workCivil and Structural Engineering: 7 fractional works · 7.9% of its workBuilding and Construction: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workMechanics of Materials: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workChemistry: 1 fractional works · 1.1% of its workAnalytical Chemistry: 1 fractional works · 1.1% of its workMaterials Science: 1 fractional works · 0.9% of its workMaterials Chemistry: 1 fractional works · 0.7% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workChemical Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workChemical Health and Safety: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workEnergy: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workRenewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSocial Sciences: 2 fractional works · 2.4% of its workDecision Sciences: 2 fractional works · 1.6% of its workStatistics, Probability and Uncertainty: 2 fractional works · 1.6% of its workBusiness, Management and Accounting: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workAccounting: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workSocial Sciences: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workPsychology: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workHealth Sciences: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workHealth Professions: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workRadiological and Ultrasound Technology: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workALL ITS WORKEdVenture93fractional works, all years
Life Sciences0%Physical Sciences97%Health Sciences0%Social Sciences2%

Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields, their subfields. Size is fractional works in all years. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.

Its 4 domains and 11 fields, with their numbers
    1. Engineering8894.6%
    2. Chemistry11.1%
    3. Materials Science10.9%
    4. Chemical Engineering00.4%
    5. Energy00.3%
    1. Decision Sciences21.6%
    2. Business, Management and Accounting00.5%
    3. Social Sciences00.2%
    4. Psychology00.1%
    1. Health Professions00.4%
    1. Agricultural and Biological Sciences00.0%
All of science, and how each field's share has moved since 1950: the Science domain explorer

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

Who are the top researchers at EdVenture?

Ranked on the quality score, Tom Grant, Robert E. Barba and Mark Rivenbark lead among researchers whose main affiliation is EdVenture.

  1. 1 Tom Grant United States · #3,280,259 worldwide 85 citations · 21 works
  2. 2 Robert E. Barba United States · #4,709,144 worldwide 91 citations · 22 works
  3. 3 Mark Rivenbark United States · #4,979,420 worldwide 85 citations · 25 works
All ranked researchers at EdVenture

What are the most cited papers from EdVenture?

The most cited paper from EdVenture is "Expandable Tubular Solutions" (Andrei G. Filippov, Robert D. Mack, Lance Cook et al., 1999), with 88 citations. Next come "Reciprocal Associations Between Science Efficacy, STEM Identity and Scientist Career Interest Among Adolescent Girls within the Context of Informal Science Learning" (31) and "Expandable Liner Hanger Provides Cost-Effective Alternative Solution" (30).

Most cited papers
#PaperReleasedCitations
1 Expandable Tubular Solutions Andrei G. Filippov, Robert D. Mack, Lance Cook et al. · SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition Conference paper 3 Oct 1999 88
2 Reciprocal Associations Between Science Efficacy, STEM Identity and Scientist Career Interest Among Adolescent Girls within the Context of Informal Science Learning Mengya Zhao, Emine Ozturk, Fidelia Law et al. · Journal of Youth and Adolescence Open access 11 Oct 2023 31
3 Expandable Liner Hanger Provides Cost-Effective Alternative Solution C. Lee Lohoefer, Ben Mathis, David Brisco et al. Conference paper 23 Feb 2000 30
4 Expandable Tubulars: Field Examples of Application in Well Construction and Remediation Chan L. Daigle, Donald B. Campo, Carey Naquin et al. · SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition Conference paper Oct 2000 30
5 Solid Expandable Tubular Technology – A Year of Case Histories in the Drilling Environment K. Dupal, Donald B. Campo, John E. Lofton et al. Conference paper 27 Feb 2001 24
All 57 most cited papers, with filters and sorting

Which keywords describe research at EdVenture?

By fractional works in all years, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Drilling Fluids, Well Integrity, Machine Learning, Artificial Lift Systems, Fault Diagnosis, Hydraulic Fracturing, Shale Gas Reservoirs and Optimization.

▲ more of its work than of the world's◆ about the world's share▼ less than the world's

Size is fractional works in all years in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 34 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.

All 34 words, with their numbers
  1. Drilling Fluids27▲ 553×1 topic
  2. Well Integrity27▲ 553×1 topic
  3. Machine Learning22▲ 11×3 topics
  4. Artificial Lift Systems19▲ 689×1 topic
  5. Fault Diagnosis19▲ 91×1 topic
  6. Hydraulic Fracturing12▲ 109×1 topic
  7. Shale Gas Reservoirs12▲ 213×1 topic
  8. Optimization11▲ 22×2 topics
  9. Data Assimilation11▲ 64×1 topic
  10. Ensemble Kalman Filter11▲ 101×1 topic
  11. Renewable Energy4▲ 4.8×2 topics
  12. Oil and Gas4▲ 136×1 topic
  13. Subsea4▲ 337×1 topic
  14. Pipeline4▲ 47×2 topics
  15. Liquefaction3▲ 45×2 topics
  16. Tunnel3▲ 45×2 topics
  17. Analysis3▲ 29×1 topic
  18. Risk Assessment3▲ 5.3×2 topics
  19. Seismic3▲ 59×1 topic
  20. Sustainability3▲ 1.73×2 topics
  21. Offshore Decommissioning3▲ 264×1 topic
  22. Performance Prediction3▲ 50×1 topic
  23. Ship Recycling3▲ 264×1 topic
  24. TBM3▲ 130×1 topic
  25. Finite Element Analysis2▲ 10×3 topics
  26. Bayesian Networks2▲ 19×1 topic
  27. Corrosion2▲ 14×2 topics
  28. Fault Tree Analysis2▲ 35×1 topic
  29. Pitting Corrosion1▲ 28×2 topics
  30. Reliability Assessment1▲ 37×1 topic
  31. Risk Analysis1▲ 21×1 topic
  32. Asphaltenes1▲ 42×1 topic
  33. Mechanical Properties1◆ 1.14×4 topics
  34. Petroleum1▲ 20×1 topic

Which research topics does EdVenture publish most on?

By volume in 2022-now: Drilling and Well Engineering, Reservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods, Hydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis and Oil and Gas Production Techniques.

  1. 1 Drilling and Well Engineering Ocean Engineering 1 works
  2. 2 Reservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods Ocean Engineering 0 works
  3. 3 Hydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis Mechanical Engineering 0 works
  4. 4 Oil and Gas Production Techniques Ocean Engineering 0 works
  5. 5 Offshore Engineering and Technologies Ocean Engineering 0 works
  6. 6 Career Development and Diversity Safety Research 0 works
  7. 7 Youth Development and Social Support Safety Research 0 works
  8. 8 Education, Achievement, and Giftedness Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 0 works
  9. 9 Science Education and Pedagogy Education 0 works
  10. 10 Science Education and Perceptions Developmental and Educational Psychology 0 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available0.2%not open99.8%

World: 40% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors22.9%domestic only77.1%

World: 18% is written across borders.

How has EdVenture's research output changed?

Output in 2022-2025 was 35% lower than in 2018-2021.

20002005201020152020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Its share of all research

Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is EdVenture as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.000021% in 2022.

0.00025%0.00050%0.00075%EdVenture0.000022% in 2023200020102020

Fractional works of EdVenture over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.

Other research institutions in Columbia

All research institutions in Columbia

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.

Discussion

Ask a question or share a note about EdVenture. Keep it to the research: no personal attacks, advertising or links. Any reader can report a post, which collapses it for everyone until it is opened.