Hochschule für Künste im Sozialen
- Research works
- 21 ▲ 1137% vs 2013–17
- Citations
- 71 3.3 per fractional work
- Top-10% rate
- 18.5% record average 16.5%
- Open access
- 37% world 28%
Not ranked overall: Hochschule für Künste im Sozialen is under the volume floor below which an excellence rate is noise. Not ranked is not the same as ranked last.
Field profile
Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.
Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Arts and Humanities, 12.8×. Every wedge is a field page.
Which keywords describe research at Hochschule für Künste im Sozialen?
By fractional works in all years, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Art, Visual Culture, Photography, Philosophy, History, Identity, Literature and Public Health.
- Technology Acceptance Model
- Patient Experience
- Intergenerational Relations
- Health Policy
- Ethical Considerations
- Long-Term Care
- Coaching
- Social Support
- Political Participation
- Exhibition
- Literature
- History
- Philosophy
- Visual Culture
- Art
- Photography
- Public Health
- Identity
- Aesthetics
- Museum
- Self-Efficacy
- Society
- E-commerce
- Psychodrama
- Family Support
- Information Systems
- Nursing Advocacy
- Quality of Care
Size is fractional works in all years in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 28 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.
All 28 words, with their numbers
- Art3▲ 160×2 topics
- Visual Culture2▲ 198×3 topics
- Photography2▲ 285×2 topics
- Philosophy2▲ 21×3 topics
- Public Health2▲ 6.2×3 topics
- History2▲ 9.8×2 topics
- Identity2▲ 10×2 topics
- Literature2▲ 16×2 topics
- Aesthetics1▲ 85×1 topic
- Exhibition1▲ 682×1 topic
- Museum1▲ 682×1 topic
- Political Participation1▲ 76×2 topics
- Self-Efficacy1▲ 31×2 topics
- Social Support1▲ 13×3 topics
- Society1▲ 27×1 topic
- Coaching1▲ 285×1 topic
- E-commerce1▲ 19×3 topics
- Long-Term Care1▲ 81×2 topics
- Psychodrama1▲ 291×1 topic
- Ethical Considerations1▲ 14×2 topics
- Family Support1▲ 74×1 topic
- Health Policy1▲ 31×1 topic
- Information Systems1▲ 32×1 topic
- Intergenerational Relations1▲ 152×1 topic
- Nursing Advocacy1▲ 256×1 topic
- Patient Experience1▲ 68×2 topics
- Quality of Care1▲ 63×2 topics
- Technology Acceptance Model1▲ 63×1 topic
Which research topics does Hochschule für Künste im Sozialen publish most on?
By volume in 2022–2025: Visual Culture and Art Theory, Art Therapy and Mental Health, Music Therapy and Health and Corporate Management and Leadership.
Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.
- 1 Visual Culture and Art Theory Visual Arts and Performing Arts 0 works
- 2 Art Therapy and Mental Health Conservation 0 works
- 3 Music Therapy and Health Social Psychology 0 works
- 4 Corporate Management and Leadership Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 0 works
- 5 Participatory Visual Research Methods Sociology and Political Science 0 works
- 6 Psychology, Coaching, and Therapy Social Psychology 0 works
- 7 Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies Clinical Psychology 0 works
- 8 Art Education and Development Visual Arts and Performing Arts 0 works
- 9 Creativity in Education and Neuroscience Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 0 works
- 10 Aesthetic Perception and Analysis Cognitive Neuroscience 0 works
How open and international is its research?
Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.
World: 28% of research is openly available.
World: 19% is written across borders.
How has Hochschule für Künste im Sozialen's research output changed?
Output in 2018–2022 was 1137% higher than in 2013–2017.
The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.