Science Explorer Interactive view Map
Topic · Sociology and Political Science

Participatory Visual Research Methods

Participatory Visual Research Methods is a research topic within Sociology and Political Science. Science Explorer counts 11k research works in it since 1950. 37.5% of them reached the world's top 10% most cited for their field and year.

This cluster of papers focuses on the use of participatory visual research methods, such as Photovoice and graphic elicitation, in social science research. It explores the engagement of communities, ethical considerations, and empowerment through visual methodologies, emphasizing youth participation and social justice.

  • Photovoice
  • Participatory Action Research
  • Visual Methodologies
  • Youth Participation
  • Community Engagement
  • Ethical Considerations
  • Arts-based Methods
  • Qualitative Inquiry
  • Empowerment
  • Social Justice
Research works
11k
fractional, since 1950
In the world top 10%
4.2k
per year above
Top-10% rate
37.5%
share of its works in the world top 10%
Growth, 2013–17 → 2018–22
+49%
the tick is no change

Which countries lead Participatory Visual Research Methods research?

By volume, the United States and the United Kingdom publish the most (712 and 529 works in 2022–2025).

By volume, 2022–2025

  1. 1 United States 712 works
  2. 2 United Kingdom 529 works
  3. 3 Canada 262 works
  4. 4 Australia 219 works
  5. 5 Spain 90 works
  6. 6 Germany 83 works
  7. 7 Netherlands 76 works
  8. 8 South Africa 70 works
  9. 9 France 66 works
  10. 10 Italy 64 works

How concentrated that is

The same countries as shares of everything the list above accounts for. A node where two countries do two thirds of the work and one spread evenly across twelve read alike as a ranking and not at all alike here.

United States: 32.8%United Kingdom: 24.4%Canada: 12.1%Australia: 10.1%6 others listed: 20.7%33%largest
United States712 · 32.8%United Kingdom529 · 24.4%Canada262 · 12.1%Australia219 · 10.1%6 others listed449 · 20.7%

Shares of the rows listed above, not of the whole node.

Which institutions lead Participatory Visual Research Methods research?

By volume in 2022–2025, University of Toronto publishes the most Participatory Visual Research Methods research, followed by University College London and University of Edinburgh.

By volume, 2022–2025

  1. 1 University of Toronto Canada 23 works
  2. 2 University College London United Kingdom 20 works
  3. 3 University of Edinburgh United Kingdom 20 works
  4. 4 Sapienza University of Rome Italy 17 works
  5. 5 University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill United States 15 works
  6. 6 University of British Columbia Canada 15 works
  7. 7 Aalborg University Denmark 14 works
  8. 8 University of Alberta Canada 14 works
  9. 9 University of Oxford United Kingdom 14 works
  10. 10 The University of Melbourne Australia 13 works

Where is Participatory Visual Research Methods research done?

The largest centres of Participatory Visual Research Methods research in 2022–2025 are London (United Kingdom), Toronto (Canada), Melbourne (Australia) and Sydney (Australia). Among places with at least 20 works in it, it is an unusually large share of all research in Newcastle upon Tyne.

Largest cities, 2022–2025

  1. 1 London United Kingdom 102 works
  2. 2 Toronto Canada 54 works
  3. 3 Melbourne Australia 54 works
  4. 4 Sydney Australia 39 works
  5. 5 New York United States 36 works
  6. 6 Montreal Canada 33 works
  7. 7 Manchester United Kingdom 27 works
  8. 8 Edinburgh United Kingdom 26 works
  9. 9 Brisbane Australia 23 works
  10. 10 Auckland New Zealand 21 works

Where it is the local speciality

  1. Newcastle upon TyneGB · 20.9 works9.0×
← less than its size predicts1×more →

Location quotient: how much more of its research is in Participatory Visual Research Methods than the world average.

See Participatory Visual Research Methods on the map

Where is the best place to study Participatory Visual Research Methods?

Among universities, judged by research, University College London, Aalborg University and RMIT University score highest, combining excellence, specialisation, size, growth and international reach. Research strength is one signal when choosing where to study; it does not measure teaching.

0%50%100%mean 38.7%fractional works in this node (log) →share in the world top 10% →University College London: 20, 49.1%Aalborg University: 14, 22.2%RMIT University: 9, 31.7%UNSW Sydney: 9, 74.5%University of Edinburgh: 20, 20.0%Manchester Metropolitan University: 11, 43.2%Newcastle University: 11, 35.9%Auckland University of Technology: 9, 33.4%University of Toronto: 23, 37.4%University of Leeds: 11, 39.6%UNSW SydneyUniversity College L…RMIT UniversityAalborg University
above the meannear itbelow it

One dot per university in the table below. The upper left is the interesting corner: small places doing unusually strong work.

#UniversityScoreTop 10%SpecialisationWorksGrowth
1University College London United Kingdom 66.949.1%5.1×20 +229.8%
2Aalborg University Denmark 61.322.2%9.5×14 +188.0%
3RMIT University Australia 60.531.7%9.1×9 +254.5%
4UNSW Sydney Australia 58.574.5%3.8×9 +398.2%
5University of Edinburgh United Kingdom 57.920.0%9.1×20 +87.4%
6Manchester Metropolitan University United Kingdom 57.243.2%22.2×11 +45.2%
7Newcastle University United Kingdom 55.435.9%9.7×11 +56.0%
8Auckland University of Technology New Zealand 55.433.4%17.1×9 +142.6%
9University of Toronto Canada 54.237.4%5.6×23 +56.8%
10University of Leeds United Kingdom 53.639.6%7.3×11 +143.4%

Universities only. Score blends excellence (30%), specialisation (25%), size (20%), growth (15%) and international reach (10%), 2015–2022; growth compares 2010–14 with 2015–19.

Is Participatory Visual Research Methods research growing?

Output in 2018–2022 was 49% higher than in 2013–2017, peaking in 2025. The fastest-growing topics are Participatory Visual Research Methods.

19801990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Which topics inside it are moving

Growth and decline on one axis around a shared zero. Two lists side by side hide the thing that matters: whether the growth dwarfs the decline, or the other way round.