InLeaVe
In research, InLeaVe stands highest in Social Sciences (#13,150 of 16,945 worldwide), over all time.
- World rank, all time
- #37,449 of 42,892
- Rank in Germany
- #1,792 of 2,077
- Research works
- 340 ▼ 41% vs 2013–17
- Citations
- 1.9k 5.7 per fractional work
- Top-10% rate
- 12.5% record average 16.5%
- Open access
- 9% world 28%
What is InLeaVe known for in research?
The fields where it stands highest, over all time, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.
| Field | World rank | Where that sits | Top-10% rate | Works |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Social SciencesDomain | #13,150 of 16,945 | 9.7% | 206 |
Each strip is that field’s whole ranked pool, with the notch where InLeaVe sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no world mark, because the world rate differs by field (from about 6% to 21% in this record).
Field profile
Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.
Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Health Professions, 4.8×. Every wedge is a field page.
- Health Professions 4.8×
- Psychology 2.6×
- Social Sciences 2.5×
- Arts and Humanities 2.2×
- Business, Management and Accounting 2.1×
- Medicine 1.2×
- Mathematics 1.0×
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance 0.6×
- Dentistry 0.5×
- Decision Sciences 0.5×
- Earth and Planetary Sciences 0.4×
- Environmental Science 0.4×
- Engineering 0.3×
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 0.1×
- Materials Science 0.1×
- Immunology and Microbiology 0.1×
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences 0.1×
- Computer Science 0.1×
Who are the top researchers at InLeaVe?
Ranked on the composite score, Ulf Jonak, Christoph Schmidt-Lellek and Fritz Schmidt lead among researchers whose main affiliation is InLeaVe.
- 1 Ulf Jonak Germany · #405,794 worldwide 0 citations · 42 works
- 2 Christoph Schmidt-Lellek Germany · #744,990 worldwide 14 citations · 17 works
- 3 Fritz Schmidt Germany · #854,034 worldwide 4 citations · 17 works
- 4 Rudolf Reindl Germany · #858,754 worldwide 5 citations · 33 works
- 5 Thomas A. Unger Germany · #873,347 worldwide 152 citations · 272 works
- 6 Klaus–Peter Huber Germany · #951,958 worldwide 10 citations · 20 works
- 7 Ernst Preger Germany · #1,249,190 worldwide 0 citations · 35 works
Which keywords describe research at InLeaVe?
By fractional works in 2022–2025, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Interdisciplinary Collaboration, Patient Care, Neoliberalism, Medical Ethics, Integrated Care, Patient Rights, Primary Care and Reproductive Medicine.
- Sustainable Development
- Right-Wing Extremism
- Guideline Development
- Digital Rights
- Clinical Guidelines
- Sustainability
- Social Innovation
- Imperialism
- Habermas
- Global Capitalism
- Gender Studies
- Big Data
- Healthcare
- Stakeholder Engagement
- Climate Change
- Interprofessional Education
- Reproductive Medicine
- Patient Rights
- Medical Ethics
- Patient Care
- Interdisciplinary Collaboration
- Neoliberalism
- Integrated Care
- Primary Care
- Rehabilitation
- Teamwork
- Education
- Artificial Intelligence
- Quality
- Digital Transformation
- Religious Education
- Gramsci
- Hegemony
- Leadership
- Social Pathologies
- Antisemitism
- Data Protection
- Governance
- Hair Follicle
- Stem Cells
Size is fractional works in 2022–2025 in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Interdisciplinary Collaboration3▲ 131×2 topics
- Patient Care3▲ 76×2 topics
- Neoliberalism2▲ 20×3 topics
- Medical Ethics2▲ 51×2 topics
- Integrated Care2▲ 139×2 topics
- Patient Rights2▲ 78×1 topic
- Primary Care2▲ 15×2 topics
- Reproductive Medicine2▲ 415×1 topic
- Rehabilitation2▲ 13×2 topics
- Interprofessional Education2▲ 171×1 topic
- Teamwork2▲ 171×1 topic
- Climate Change2▲ 1.60×8 topics
- Education2▲ 2.5×2 topics
- Stakeholder Engagement2▲ 49×3 topics
- Artificial Intelligence1▲ 3.0×3 topics
- Healthcare1▲ 3.7×1 topic
- Quality1▲ 103×1 topic
- Big Data1▲ 4.3×2 topics
- Digital Transformation1▲ 7.3×3 topics
- Gender Studies1▲ 25×2 topics
- Religious Education1▲ 23×2 topics
- Global Capitalism1▲ 59×1 topic
- Gramsci1▲ 668×1 topic
- Habermas1▲ 289×1 topic
- Hegemony1▲ 130×1 topic
- Imperialism1▲ 42×1 topic
- Leadership1▲ 7.1×3 topics
- Social Innovation1▲ 22×2 topics
- Social Pathologies1▲ 289×1 topic
- Sustainability1▲ 1.43×3 topics
- Antisemitism1▲ 300×1 topic
- Clinical Guidelines1▲ 10×1 topic
- Data Protection1▲ 110×1 topic
- Digital Rights1▲ 321×1 topic
- Governance1▲ 8.8×2 topics
- Guideline Development1▲ 142×1 topic
- Hair Follicle1▲ 160×1 topic
- Right-Wing Extremism1▲ 300×1 topic
- Stem Cells1▲ 11×1 topic
- Sustainable Development1▲ 1.87×4 topics
Which research topics does InLeaVe publish most on?
By volume in 2022–2025: Medical and Health Sciences Research, Interprofessional Education and Collaboration, Medical Practices and Rehabilitation and Political theory and Gramsci.
Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.
- 1 Medical and Health Sciences Research Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 2 works
- 2 Interprofessional Education and Collaboration General Health Professions 2 works
- 3 Medical Practices and Rehabilitation Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation 1 works
- 4 Political theory and Gramsci Sociology and Political Science 1 works
- 5 Economic and Social Issues Sociology and Political Science 1 works
- 6 Critical Theory and Philosophy Sociology and Political Science 1 works
- 7 German legal, social, and political studies Sociology and Political Science 1 works
- 8 Hair Growth and Disorders Urology 1 works
- 9 Digitalization, Law, and Regulation Law 1 works
- 10 Clinical practice guidelines implementation Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 1 works
How open and international is its research?
Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.
World: 28% of research is openly available.
World: 19% is written across borders.
How has InLeaVe's research output changed?
Output in 2018–2022 was 41% lower than in 2013–2017.
The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Other research institutions in Oberursel
Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.