Science Explorer Interactive view Map

Interprofessional Education and Collaboration

Interprofessional Education and Collaboration is a research topic within General Health Professions. Science Explorer counts 28k research works in it since 1950. 22.2% of them reached the world's top 10% most cited for their field and year.

This cluster of papers focuses on the concept and practice of interprofessional collaboration within healthcare teams. It explores topics such as interprofessional education, teamwork, integrated care, healthcare outcomes, professional practice, collaborative practice, patient care, communication, and interdisciplinary collaboration.

  • Interprofessional Education
  • Teamwork
  • Integrated Care
  • Healthcare Outcomes
  • Professional Practice
  • Collaborative Practice
  • Patient Care
  • Communication
  • Primary Care
  • Interdisciplinary Collaboration
Research works
28k
fractional, since 1950
In the world top 10%
6.3k
per year above
Top-10% rate
22.2%
share of its works in the world top 10%
Growth, 2013–17 → 2018–22
+24%
the tick is no change

This ranks research output and citation impact. It says nothing about the quality of diagnosis, treatment or care.

Which countries lead Interprofessional Education and Collaboration research?

By volume, the United States and the United Kingdom publish the most (1.9k and 708 works in 2022–2025).

By volume, 2022–2025

  1. 1 United States 1.9k works
  2. 2 United Kingdom 708 works
  3. 3 Canada 435 works
  4. 4 Australia 390 works
  5. 5 Netherlands 201 works
  6. 6 Germany 180 works
  7. 7 China 125 works
  8. 8 South Africa 120 works
  9. 9 Sweden 114 works
  10. 10 Japan 107 works

How concentrated that is

The same countries as shares of everything the list above accounts for. A node where two countries do two thirds of the work and one spread evenly across twelve read alike as a ranking and not at all alike here.

United States: 44.2%United Kingdom: 16.6%Canada: 10.2%Australia: 9.1%6 others listed: 19.9%44%largest
United States1,886 · 44.2%United Kingdom708 · 16.6%Canada435 · 10.2%Australia390 · 9.1%6 others listed847 · 19.9%

Shares of the rows listed above, not of the whole node.

Which institutions lead Interprofessional Education and Collaboration research?

By volume in 2022–2025, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill publishes the most Interprofessional Education and Collaboration research, followed by University of Toronto and Monash University.

By volume, 2022–2025

  1. 1 University of North Carolina at Chapel HillUnited States 47 works
  2. 2 University of TorontoCanada 33 works
  3. 3 Monash UniversityAustralia 23 works
  4. 4 Western UniversityCanada 21 works
  5. 5 The University of SydneyAustralia 20 works
  6. 6 The University of QueenslandAustralia 20 works
  7. 7 University of WashingtonUnited States 18 works
  8. 8 King's College LondonUnited Kingdom 18 works
  9. 9 University of British ColumbiaCanada 18 works
  10. 10 University of MichiganUnited States 18 works

Where is Interprofessional Education and Collaboration research done?

The largest centres of Interprofessional Education and Collaboration research in 2022–2025 are London (United Kingdom), Toronto (Canada), Melbourne (Australia) and New York (United States).

Largest cities, 2022–2025

  1. 1 London United Kingdom 179 works
  2. 2 Toronto Canada 94 works
  3. 3 Melbourne Australia 86 works
  4. 4 New York United States 68 works
  5. 5 Boston United States 67 works
  6. 6 Sydney Australia 62 works
  7. 7 Brisbane Australia 52 works
  8. 8 Washington D.C. United States 52 works
  9. 9 Dublin Ireland 52 works
  10. 10 Chapel Hill United States 50 works
See Interprofessional Education and Collaboration on the map

Where is the best place to study Interprofessional Education and Collaboration?

Among universities, judged by research, University of Eastern Finland, University of Otago and OsloMet – Oslo Metropolitan University score highest, combining excellence, specialisation, size, growth and international reach. Research strength is one signal when choosing where to study; it does not measure teaching.

0%20%40%60%mean 29.02%fractional works in this node (log) →share in the world top 10% →University of Eastern Finland: 16, 25.0%University of Otago: 16, 19.1%OsloMet – Oslo Metropolitan University: 9, 31.5%Maastricht University: 17, 24.9%Macquarie University: 9, 50.2%University College Dublin: 12, 31.2%Tilburg University: 9, 21.5%Université de Montréal: 14, 33.1%James Cook University: 8, 31.1%Western University: 21, 22.6%OsloMet – Oslo Metro…University of Easter…Maastricht UniversityUniversity of Otago
above the meannear itbelow it

One dot per university in the table below. The upper left is the interesting corner: small places doing unusually strong work.

#UniversityScoreTop 10%SpecialisationWorksGrowth
1 University of Eastern FinlandFinland 64.225.0%13.7×16 +199.7%
2 University of OtagoNew Zealand 60.819.1%9.9×16 +227.4%
3 OsloMet – Oslo Metropolitan UniversityNorway 58.931.5%16.4×9 +145.2%
4 Maastricht UniversityNetherlands 56.924.9%8.9×17 +92.0%
5 Macquarie UniversityAustralia 53.350.2%4.3×9 +129.8%
6 University College DublinIreland 49.731.2%5.0×12 +173.4%
7 Tilburg UniversityNetherlands 49.721.5%9.8×9 +110.3%
8 Université de MontréalCanada 49.333.1%5.7×14 +113.4%
9 James Cook UniversityAustralia 49.031.1%10.7×8 +11.9%
10 Western UniversityCanada 48.022.6%6.7×21 +71.0%

Universities only. Score blends excellence (30%), specialisation (25%), size (20%), growth (15%) and international reach (10%), 2015–2022; growth compares 2010–14 with 2015–19.

Is Interprofessional Education and Collaboration research growing?

Output in 2018–2022 was 24% higher than in 2013–2017, peaking in 2025. The fastest-growing topics are Interprofessional Education and Collaboration.

19801990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Which topics inside it are moving

Growth and decline on one axis around a shared zero. Two lists side by side hide the thing that matters: whether the growth dwarfs the decline, or the other way round.