- Research works
- 52 ◆ 0% vs 2013–17
- Citations
- 2k 37.9 per fractional work
- Top-10% rate
- 28.5% record average 16.5%
- Open access
- 44% world 28%
Not ranked overall: Institute for Environmental Policy is under the volume floor below which an excellence rate is noise. Not ranked is not the same as ranked last.
Field profile
Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.
Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics, 12.8×. Every wedge is a field page.
- Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics 12.8×
- Environmental Science 7.5×
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4.2×
- Energy 2.5×
- Social Sciences 1.5×
- Business, Management and Accounting 1.1×
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 0.6×
- Computer Science 0.6×
- Earth and Planetary Sciences 0.6×
- Health Professions 0.6×
- Medicine 0.4×
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences 0.3×
- Psychology 0.3×
- Engineering 0.2×
- Arts and Humanities 0.2×
Who are the top researchers at Institute for Environmental Policy?
Ranked on the composite score, R Honzák lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Institute for Environmental Policy.
- 1 R Honzák Czechia · #731,259 worldwide 3 citations · 26 works
Which keywords describe research at Institute for Environmental Policy?
By fractional works in all years, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Climate Change, Global Warming, Sustainability, Human Rights, Constitutionalism, Environmental Impact, Water Resources and Democracy.
- Property Rights
- Land Tenure
- Economic Development
- Agricultural Investment
- Sustainable Development
- Ecosystem Resilience
- Sediment Transport
- Global Governance
- Economic Impacts
- Carbon Pricing
- Policy Instruments
- Clinical Trials
- Urbanization
- Biodiversity Conservation
- European Legal Systems
- Democracy
- Constitutionalism
- Human Rights
- Sustainability
- Climate Change
- Environmental Impact
- Global Warming
- Water Resources
- Environmental Policy
- Judicial Review
- Greenhouse Gas Emissions
- Land Use Change
- Rural Development
- Hydrological Modeling
- Community Engagement
- Renewable Energy
- Public Health
- Climate Change Impacts
- Sustainability Assessment
- Water Quality
- Biodiversity
- Informed Consent
- Model Evaluation
- Research Participation
Size is fractional works in all years in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 39 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.
All 39 words, with their numbers
- Climate Change10▲ 7.1×35 topics
- Sustainability4▲ 3.9×16 topics
- Environmental Impact3▲ 4.4×19 topics
- Human Rights3▲ 6.4×3 topics
- Global Warming3▲ 14×8 topics
- Constitutionalism2▲ 42×2 topics
- Water Resources2▲ 19×4 topics
- Democracy2▲ 11×2 topics
- Environmental Policy2▲ 26×4 topics
- European Legal Systems2▲ 94×1 topic
- Judicial Review2▲ 38×1 topic
- Biodiversity Conservation2▲ 15×6 topics
- Greenhouse Gas Emissions2▲ 20×4 topics
- Urbanization2▲ 12×5 topics
- Land Use Change2▲ 12×3 topics
- Clinical Trials2▲ 5.1×2 topics
- Rural Development2▲ 11×5 topics
- Policy Instruments2▲ 64×2 topics
- Hydrological Modeling2▲ 14×2 topics
- Carbon Pricing1▲ 73×1 topic
- Community Engagement1▲ 8.8×3 topics
- Economic Impacts1▲ 42×1 topic
- Renewable Energy1▲ 2.6×6 topics
- Global Governance1▲ 12×3 topics
- Public Health1▲ 1.89×6 topics
- Sediment Transport1▲ 15×3 topics
- Climate Change Impacts1▲ 16×4 topics
- Ecosystem Resilience1▲ 14×4 topics
- Sustainability Assessment1▲ 20×3 topics
- Sustainable Development1▲ 1.81×6 topics
- Water Quality1▲ 5.2×5 topics
- Agricultural Investment1▲ 131×1 topic
- Biodiversity1▲ 2.6×6 topics
- Economic Development1▲ 2.9×6 topics
- Informed Consent1▲ 22×1 topic
- Land Tenure1▲ 51×1 topic
- Model Evaluation1▲ 18×2 topics
- Property Rights1▲ 17×2 topics
- Research Participation1▲ 86×1 topic
Which research topics does Institute for Environmental Policy publish most on?
By volume in 2022–2025: Wildlife Ecology and Conservation, Recycling and Waste Management Techniques, Indigenous Cultures and Socio-Education and Microplastics and Plastic Pollution.
Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.
- 1 Wildlife Ecology and Conservation Ecology 0 works
- 2 Recycling and Waste Management Techniques Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering 0 works
- 3 Indigenous Cultures and Socio-Education Cultural Studies 0 works
- 4 Microplastics and Plastic Pollution Pollution 0 works
- 5 Medical and Pharmaceutic Studies Pharmacology 0 works
- 6 Historical Studies in Latin America Demography 0 works
- 7 Climate Change Policy and Economics Economics and Econometrics 0 works
- 8 Energy, Environment, Economic Growth Economics and Econometrics 0 works
- 9 Climate Change and Health Impacts Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 0 works
- 10 Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment 0 works
How open and international is its research?
Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.
World: 28% of research is openly available.
World: 19% is written across borders.
How has Institute for Environmental Policy's research output changed?
Output in 2018–2022 was 0% higher than in 2013–2017.
The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Other research institutions in Prague
- Charles University
- Czech Technical University in Prague
- Czech Academy of Sciences
- FZU ‒ Institute of Physics of the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic
- University of Chemistry and Technology, Prague
- Czech University of Life Sciences Prague
- Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Microbiology
- Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Physiology
Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.