Science Explorer Interactive view Map
Nonprofit · Washington · United States

Institute for Women's Policy Research

In research, Institute for Women's Policy Research stands highest in Social Sciences (#8,930 of 10,521 worldwide), 2022–2025.

iwpr.orgROR OpenAlex
World rank, 2022–2025
#19,212
of 28,054 · #14,013 all time
Rank in United States
#2,791
of 4,192
Research works
862
▲ 8% vs 2013–17
Citations
23k
26.2 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
11.4%
record average 16.5%
Open access
40%
world 28%

What is Institute for Women's Policy Research known for in research?

The fields where it stands highest, 2022–2025, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.

FieldWorld rankWhere that sitsTop-10% rateWorksAll time
Social SciencesDomain #8,930 of 10,521 9.6%65 #4534

Each strip is that field’s whole ranked pool, with the notch where Institute for Women's Policy Research sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no world mark, because the world rate differs by field (from about 6% to 21% in this record).

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

Agricultural and Biological Sciences: 0.84× its world share, 5 worksAgricultural and Bio…Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 0.27× its world share, 2 worksBiochemistry, Geneti…Immunology and Microbiology: 0.55× its world share, 1 worksImmunology and Micro…Neuroscience: 0.54× its world share, 1 worksNeurosciencePharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics: 3.39× its world share, 2 worksPharmacology, Toxico…Chemistry: 1.08× its world share, 2 worksChemistryComputer Science: 1.19× its world share, 12 worksComputer ScienceEnergy: 0.62× its world share, 1 worksEnergyEngineering: 0.41× its world share, 8 worksEngineeringEnvironmental Science: 0.39× its world share, 2 worksEnvironmental ScienceMaterials Science: 0.45× its world share, 2 worksMaterials ScienceMathematics: 1.01× its world share, 2 worksMathematicsPhysics and Astronomy: 0.19× its world share, 1 worksPhysics and AstronomyHealth Professions: 1.53× its world share, 5 worksHealth ProfessionsMedicine: 0.80× its world share, 20 worksMedicineNursing: 1.03× its world share, 1 worksNursingArts and Humanities: 2.25× its world share, 9 worksArts and HumanitiesBusiness, Management and Accounting: 1.44× its world share, 6 worksBusiness, Management…Decision Sciences: 0.91× its world share, 1 worksDecision SciencesEconomics, Econometrics and Finance: 0.85× its world share, 2 worksEconomics, Econometr…Psychology: 3.04× its world share, 12 worksPsychologySocial Sciences: 2.07× its world share, 34 worksSocial Sciences1×world share
more than its size predictsabout as predictedless

Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics, 3.4×. Every wedge is a field page.

Who are the top researchers at Institute for Women's Policy Research?

Ranked on the composite score, Heidi Hartmann, A. Sivanandan and Geoffrey Aronson lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Institute for Women's Policy Research.

  1. 1 Heidi Hartmann United States · #233,070 worldwide 105 citations · 29 works
  2. 2 A. Sivanandan United States · #594,027 worldwide 35 citations · 16 works
  3. 3 Geoffrey Aronson United States · #889,661 worldwide 0 citations · 38 works
All ranked researchers at Institute for Women's Policy Research

Which keywords describe research at Institute for Women's Policy Research?

By fractional works in 2022–2025, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Mental Health, Globalization, Intersectionality, Human Rights, Feminism, Stress, Gender and Health Disparities.

▲ more of its work than of the world’s◆ about the world’s share▼ less than the world’s

Size is fractional works in 2022–2025 in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.

All 40 words, with their numbers
  1. Mental Health11▲ 5.9×19 topics
  2. Globalization9▲ 3.5×20 topics
  3. Human Rights6▲ 4.6×13 topics
  4. Intersectionality5▲ 22×7 topics
  5. Feminism5▲ 12×7 topics
  6. Gender5▲ 6.4×9 topics
  7. Sustainability5▲ 1.43×11 topics
  8. Healthcare4▲ 2.9×9 topics
  9. Stress4▲ 8.8×6 topics
  10. Identity4▲ 4.1×9 topics
  11. Public Health4▲ 1.94×16 topics
  12. Health Disparities3▲ 9.9×4 topics
  13. Graph Labeling3▲ 187×1 topic
  14. Metric Dimension3▲ 187×1 topic
  15. Political Economy3▲ 9.7×4 topics
  16. Stigma3▲ 17×2 topics
  17. Gender Inequality3▲ 17×5 topics
  18. Discrimination3▲ 11×3 topics
  19. Prevalence3▲ 5.2×6 topics
  20. Gender Identity3▲ 19×2 topics
  21. Job Satisfaction3▲ 4.7×6 topics
  22. Gender-based Violence3▲ 35×2 topics
  23. LGBTQ+2▲ 46×1 topic
  24. Psychiatric Disorders2▲ 14×4 topics
  25. Social Stress2▲ 46×1 topic
  26. International Relations2▲ 7.7×4 topics
  27. Migration2▲ 5.2×3 topics
  28. Psychological Resilience2▲ 19×2 topics
  29. Smallholder Farmers2▲ 8.0×3 topics
  30. Health Consequences2▲ 5.7×5 topics
  31. Neurobiology2▲ 6.7×5 topics
  32. Organizational Performance2▲ 6.7×4 topics
  33. National Identity2▲ 14×3 topics
  34. Positive Emotions2▲ 14×2 topics
  35. Refugees2▲ 12×3 topics
  36. Adversity2▲ 21×1 topic
  37. Substance Use Disorders2▲ 19×2 topics
  38. Feminist Theory2▲ 33×3 topics
  39. Peacebuilding2▲ 21×4 topics
  40. Stereotypes2▲ 14×3 topics

Which research topics does Institute for Women's Policy Research publish most on?

By volume in 2022–2025: Graph Labeling and Dimension Problems, LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy, Resilience and Mental Health and South Asian Cinema and Culture.

Graph Labeling and Dimension Problems: 3 fractional worksLGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy: 2 fractional worksResilience and Mental Health: 2 fractional worksSouth Asian Cinema and Culture: 2 fractional worksKorean Peninsula Historical and Political Studies: 2 fractional worksIntimate Partner and Family Violence: 2 fractional worksGender Politics and Repr…2Gender Politics and Representation: 2 fractional worksGender, Feminism, and Media: 1 fractional worksAgriculture, Land Use, Rural Development: 1 fractional worksEntrepreneurship Studies…1Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences: 1 fractional works
Computational Theory and MathematicsSocial PsychologyClinical PsychologyVisual Arts and Performing Arts5 others

Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.

  1. 1 Graph Labeling and Dimension Problems Computational Theory and Mathematics 3 works
  2. 2 LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy Social Psychology 2 works
  3. 3 Resilience and Mental Health Clinical Psychology 2 works
  4. 4 South Asian Cinema and Culture Visual Arts and Performing Arts 2 works
  5. 5 Korean Peninsula Historical and Political Studies Sociology and Political Science 2 works
  6. 6 Intimate Partner and Family Violence Health 2 works
  7. 7 Gender Politics and Representation Gender Studies 2 works
  8. 8 Gender, Feminism, and Media Gender Studies 1 works
  9. 9 Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development General Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 works
  10. 10 Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences Management of Technology and Innovation 1 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available39.7%not open60.3%

World: 28% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors18.0%domestic only82.0%

World: 19% is written across borders.

How has Institute for Women's Policy Research's research output changed?

Output in 2018–2022 was 8% higher than in 2013–2017.

1990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Other research institutions in Washington

All research institutions in Washington

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.