Science Explorer Back to mapMap
Discussion
Company · Oklahoma City · United States

NanoMed Targeting Systems (United States)

nanomed-systems.comROR OpenAlex
Research works
4
▲ 160% vs 2018-21
Citations
51
13.9 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
7.0%
all institutions 10.0%
Open access
35%
world 40%
International
58%
world 18%
NanoMed Targeting Systems (United States)

Not ranked overall: NanoMed Targeting Systems (United States) is under the volume floor below which a citation excellence rate is noise. Not ranked is not the same as ranked last.

Which fields of science does NanoMed Targeting Systems (United States) work in?

In all years, 41% of research at NanoMed Targeting Systems (United States) is in Life Sciences, 35% in Physical Sciences. Its largest fields are Neuroscience (27%), Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (14%), Social Sciences (14%). It does 1.3× the world's share of Life Sciences.

Life Sciences: 2 fractional works · 40.5% of its workNeuroscience: 1 fractional works · 27.0% of its workBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 0 fractional works · 13.5% of its workPhysical Sciences: 1 fractional works · 35.1% of its workEngineering: 0 fractional works · 10.8% of its workMaterials Science: 0 fractional works · 10.8% of its workChemistry: 0 fractional works · 8.1% of its workChemical Engineering: 0 fractional works · 2.7% of its workEarth and Planetary Sciences: 0 fractional works · 2.7% of its workSocial Sciences: 1 fractional works · 21.6% of its workSocial Sciences: 0 fractional works · 13.5% of its workEconomics, Econometrics and Finance: 0 fractional works · 5.4% of its workBusiness, Management and Accounting: 0 fractional works · 2.7% of its workHealth Sciences: 0 fractional works · 2.7% of its workMedicine: 0 fractional works · 2.7% of its workALL ITS WORKNanoMed TargetingSystems (United…4fractional works, all years
Life Sciences41%Physical Sciences35%Health Sciences3%Social Sciences22%

Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields. Size is fractional works in all years. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.

Its 4 domains and 11 fields, with their numbers
    1. Neuroscience127.0%
    2. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology013.5%
    1. Engineering010.8%
    2. Materials Science010.8%
    3. Chemistry08.1%
    4. Chemical Engineering02.7%
    5. Earth and Planetary Sciences02.7%
    1. Social Sciences013.5%
    2. Economics, Econometrics and Finance05.4%
    3. Business, Management and Accounting02.7%
    1. Medicine02.7%
All of science, and how each field's share has moved since 1950: the Science domain explorer

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 4.39× its world share, 0 worksBiochemistry, Geneti…Chemical Engineering: 16.72× its world share, 0 worksChemical EngineeringChemistry: 11.18× its world share, 0 worksChemistryEngineering: 1.56× its world share, 0 worksEngineeringMaterials Science: 0.84× its world share, 0 worksMaterials ScienceMedicine: 0.36× its world share, 0 worksMedicineBusiness, Management and Accounting: 1.81× its world share, 0 worksBusiness, Management…Economics, Econometrics and Finance: 6.56× its world share, 0 worksEconomics, Econometr…1×world share
more than its size predictsabout as predictedless

Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Chemical Engineering, 16.7×. Every wedge is a field page.

All 8 fields, with their numbers
  1. Chemical Engineering16.72×0 works
  2. Chemistry11.18×0 works
  3. Economics, Econometrics and Finance6.56×0 works
  4. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology4.39×0 works
  5. Business, Management and Accounting1.81×0 works
  6. Engineering1.56×0 works
  7. Materials Science0.84×0 works
  8. Medicine0.36×0 works

What are the most cited papers from NanoMed Targeting Systems (United States)?

The most cited paper from NanoMed Targeting Systems (United States) is "Imaging of nanoparticle uptake and kinetics of intracellular trafficking in individual cells" (Natalia N. Vtyurina, Christoffer Åberg, Anna Laura Salvati, 2021), with 79 citations. Next come "Lipid Composition Determines Hybrid Nanoparticle Selectivity: Beyond Membrane Mimicry in Cancer Targeting" (0) and "Commissioning-based framework to enhance asset life cycles in manufacturing environments" (0).

Most cited papers
#PaperReleasedCitations
1 Imaging of nanoparticle uptake and kinetics of intracellular trafficking in individual cells Natalia N. Vtyurina, Christoffer Åberg, Anna Laura Salvati · Nanoscale Open access 2021 79
2 Lipid Composition Determines Hybrid Nanoparticle Selectivity: Beyond Membrane Mimicry in Cancer Targeting L. Gonzalo Espinoza-Arcos, Matías Valdés-Peña, Juan Pablo et al. · Nano Letters Open access 7 May 2026 0
3 Commissioning-based framework to enhance asset life cycles in manufacturing environments Lucas Pronk, Ronald Liefhebber, Roy Damgrave et al. · Production & Manufacturing Research Open access 28 Nov 2025 0
All 3 most cited papers, with filters and sorting

Which research topics does NanoMed Targeting Systems (United States) publish most on?

By volume in 2022-now: Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies, Electrochemical sensors and biosensors, Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications and Product Development and Customization.

Metabolomics and Mass Sp…0Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies: 0 fractional worksElectrochemical sensors …0Electrochemical sensors and biosensors: 0 fractional worksMass Spectrometry Techni…0Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications: 0 fractional worksProduct Development and …0Product Development and Customization: 0 fractional worksMolecular Sensors and Ion Detection: 0 fractional worksDigital Transformation in Industry: 0 fractional worksMonetary Policy and Econ…0Monetary Policy and Economic Impact: 0 fractional worksFiscal Policy and Economic Growth: 0 fractional worksFiscal Policies and Political Economy: 0 fractional worksFlexible and Reconfigura…0Flexible and Reconfigurable Manufacturing Systems: 0 fractional works
Molecular BiologyElectrical and Electronic EngineeringSpectroscopyManagement of Technology and Innovation3 others

Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.

  1. 1 Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies Molecular Biology 0 works
  2. 2 Electrochemical sensors and biosensors Electrical and Electronic Engineering 0 works
  3. 3 Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications Spectroscopy 0 works
  4. 4 Product Development and Customization Management of Technology and Innovation 0 works
  5. 5 Molecular Sensors and Ion Detection Spectroscopy 0 works
  6. 6 Digital Transformation in Industry Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering 0 works
  7. 7 Monetary Policy and Economic Impact General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 0 works
  8. 8 Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth Economics and Econometrics 0 works
  9. 9 Fiscal Policies and Political Economy Economics and Econometrics 0 works
  10. 10 Flexible and Reconfigurable Manufacturing Systems Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering 0 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available34.7%not open65.3%

World: 40% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors58.5%domestic only41.5%

World: 18% is written across borders.

How has NanoMed Targeting Systems (United States)'s research output changed?

Output in 2022-2025 was 160% higher than in 2018-2021.

still counting1990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Other research institutions in Oklahoma City

All research institutions in Oklahoma City

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.

Discussion

Ask a question or share a note about NanoMed Targeting Systems (United States). Keep it to the research: no personal attacks, advertising or links. Any reader can report a post, which collapses it for everyone until it is opened.