National Board of Health
In research, National Board of Health stands highest in Health Sciences (#9,141 of 20,462 worldwide), over all time.
- World rank, all time
- #21,131 of 42,892
- Rank in Denmark
- #118 of 205
- Research works
- 328 ▼ 58% vs 2013–17
- Citations
- 10k 31.9 per fractional work
- Top-10% rate
- 19.9% record average 16.5%
- Open access
- 19% world 28%
What is National Board of Health known for in research?
The fields where it stands highest, over all time, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.
| Field | World rank | Where that sits | Top-10% rate | Works |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Health SciencesDomain | #9,141 of 20,462 | 18.8% | 170 |
Each strip is that field’s whole ranked pool, with the notch where National Board of Health sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no world mark, because the world rate differs by field (from about 6% to 21% in this record).
Field profile
Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.
Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics, 12.1×. Every wedge is a field page.
- Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics 12.1×
- Health Professions 5.2×
- Nursing 5.2×
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4.3×
- Psychology 3.6×
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1.6×
- Business, Management and Accounting 1.5×
- Immunology and Microbiology 1.5×
- Chemistry 1.3×
- Social Sciences 1.3×
- Medicine 1.0×
- Neuroscience 0.8×
- Environmental Science 0.8×
- Arts and Humanities 0.7×
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 0.2×
- Mathematics 0.2×
Who are the top researchers at National Board of Health?
Ranked on the composite score, Knud Kristensen lead among researchers whose main affiliation is National Board of Health.
- 1 Knud Kristensen Denmark · #888,352 worldwide 33 citations · 15 works
Which keywords describe research at National Board of Health?
By fractional works in all years, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Quality of Life, Primary Care, Epidemiology, Public Health, Ethical Guidelines, Tacit Knowledge, Dementia Care and Interactional Expertise.
- Community Health
- Health Promotion
- Pedagogy
- Organizational Culture
- Radioimmunotherapy
- Prevention
- Dosimetry
- Cost-effectiveness Analysis
- Evidence-Based Practice
- PET Imaging
- Cancer Treatment
- Communication
- Clinical Trials
- Chirality
- Interactional Expertise
- Tacit Knowledge
- Ethical Guidelines
- Risk Factors
- Primary Care
- Quality of Life
- Epidemiology
- Public Health
- Inflammation
- Qualitative Research
- Health Effects
- Dementia Care
- Liquid Chromatography
- Chiral Separation
- Gas Chromatography
- Global Burden
- Economic Evaluation
- Targeted Therapy
- Social Determinants
- Health Utility Measures
- Healthcare Quality
- Quality Improvement
- Radiopharmaceuticals
- Cancer Risk
- Social Sciences
- Health Equity
Size is fractional works in all years in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Epidemiology25▲ 1.93×69 topics
- Quality of Life21▲ 4.8×28 topics
- Public Health16▲ 3.5×29 topics
- Primary Care14▲ 9.9×13 topics
- Inflammation10▲ 1.35×28 topics
- Risk Factors10▲ 2.9×22 topics
- Qualitative Research8▲ 4.3×7 topics
- Ethical Guidelines8▲ 45×2 topics
- Health Effects8▲ 3.9×15 topics
- Tacit Knowledge8▲ 39×2 topics
- Dementia Care8▲ 129×1 topic
- Interactional Expertise8▲ 137×1 topic
- Liquid Chromatography7▲ 15×2 topics
- Chirality7▲ 14×2 topics
- Chiral Separation7▲ 17×1 topic
- Clinical Trials7▲ 3.4×10 topics
- Gas Chromatography7▲ 17×1 topic
- Communication6▲ 6.8×4 topics
- Global Burden6▲ 3.5×10 topics
- Cancer Treatment6▲ 7.0×3 topics
- Economic Evaluation6▲ 14×2 topics
- PET Imaging6▲ 8.2×3 topics
- Targeted Therapy6▲ 8.2×4 topics
- Evidence-Based Practice6▲ 10×7 topics
- Social Determinants6▲ 9.1×4 topics
- Cost-effectiveness Analysis6▲ 22×1 topic
- Health Utility Measures6▲ 22×1 topic
- Dosimetry5▲ 18×2 topics
- Healthcare Quality5▲ 14×4 topics
- Prevention5▲ 4.1×6 topics
- Quality Improvement5▲ 7.8×8 topics
- Radioimmunotherapy5▲ 41×1 topic
- Radiopharmaceuticals5▲ 41×1 topic
- Organizational Culture5▲ 5.8×7 topics
- Cancer Risk5▲ 6.0×5 topics
- Pedagogy5▲ 4.5×3 topics
- Social Sciences5▲ 9.2×2 topics
- Health Promotion5▲ 5.0×7 topics
- Health Equity4▲ 7.5×4 topics
- Community Health4▲ 8.4×5 topics
Which research topics does National Board of Health publish most on?
By volume in 2022–2025: Plant Physiology and Cultivation Studies, Employment and Welfare Studies, Workplace Health and Well-being and Economic Theory and Policy.
Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.
- 1 Plant Physiology and Cultivation Studies Plant Science 1 works
- 2 Employment and Welfare Studies General Health Professions 0 works
- 3 Workplace Health and Well-being General Health Professions 0 works
- 4 Economic Theory and Policy General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 0 works
- 5 Political Conflict and Governance Sociology and Political Science 0 works
- 6 Analytical Methods in Pharmaceuticals Analytical Chemistry 0 works
- 7 Monetary Policy and Economic Impact General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 0 works
- 8 Advanced Drug Delivery Systems Pharmaceutical Science 0 works
- 9 Drug Solubulity and Delivery Systems Pharmaceutical Science 0 works
- 10 Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East Political Science and International Relations 0 works
How open and international is its research?
Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.
World: 28% of research is openly available.
World: 19% is written across borders.
How has National Board of Health's research output changed?
Output in 2018–2022 was 58% lower than in 2013–2017.
The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Other research institutions in Copenhagen
- University of Copenhagen
- Rigshospitalet
- Copenhagen Business School
- Copenhagen University Hospital
- Gentofte Hospital
- Bispebjerg Hospital
- Statens Serum Institut
- Novo Nordisk (Denmark)
Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.