Science Explorer Interactive view Map
Government institution · Tokyo · Japan

National Institute of Mental Health

In research, National Institute of Mental Health stands highest in Social Sciences (#7,748 of 10,521 worldwide), Health Sciences (#9,716 of 11,982 worldwide) and Medicine (#8,639 of 10,443 worldwide), 2022–2025. Relative to its size it is most specialised in Cognitive Neuroscience, Clinical Psychology and Neuroscience — Cognitive Neuroscience is 15.3× its share of world research.

World rank, 2022–2025
#10,961
of 28,054 · #8,295 all time
Rank in Japan
#271
of 1,070
Research works
1.3k
▲ 40% vs 2013–17
Citations
41k
32.1 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
17.6%
record average 16.5%
Open access
45%
world 28%

What is National Institute of Mental Health known for in research?

The fields where it stands highest, 2022–2025, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.

FieldWorld rankWhere that sitsTop-10% rateWorksAll time
Social SciencesDomain #7,748 of 10,521 22.0%75 #3320
Health SciencesDomain #9,716 of 11,982 15.0%76 #9314
MedicineField #8,639 of 10,443 13.0%63 #9364

Each strip is that field’s whole ranked pool, with the notch where National Institute of Mental Health sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no world mark, because the world rate differs by field (from about 6% to 21% in this record).

Which of those standings moved

The same fields on both windows: where it stood over the whole record, and where it stands in 2022–2025. The distance is the story, and it is the one thing the two rank columns above cannot show.

  1. Social Sciences#3,320 #7,748
  2. Health Sciences#9,314 #9,716
  3. Medicine#9,364 #8,639
all time2022–2025, better2022–2025, worse

A dot further right is a better standing. Fields it was not ranked in over the whole record are left out.

What does National Institute of Mental Health specialise in?

Where its research is concentrated relative to its size: Cognitive Neuroscience takes 15.3× the share of its output that it takes of world research.

  1. Cognitive NeuroscienceSubfield · 24.4 works15×
  2. Clinical PsychologySubfield · 31.5 works14×
  3. NeuroscienceField · 43.8 works12×
← less than its size predicts1×more →

Location quotient, a volume reading rather than an impact one. It surfaces small, lopsided specialities.

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

Agricultural and Biological Sciences: 0.13× its world share, 1 worksAgricultural and Bio…Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 1.03× its world share, 12 worksBiochemistry, Geneti…Immunology and Microbiology: 0.30× its world share, 1 worksImmunology and Micro…Neuroscience: 12.36× its world share, 44 worksNeurosciencePharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics: 2.10× its world share, 2 worksPharmacology, Toxico…Chemistry: 0.19× its world share, 1 worksChemistryComputer Science: 0.14× its world share, 2 worksComputer ScienceEngineering: 0.07× its world share, 2 worksEngineeringEnvironmental Science: 0.14× its world share, 2 worksEnvironmental ScienceMaterials Science: 0.01× its world share, 0 worksMaterials ScienceMathematics: 0.41× its world share, 1 worksMathematicsPhysics and Astronomy: 0.06× its world share, 0 worksPhysics and AstronomyDentistry: 0.08× its world share, 0 worksDentistryHealth Professions: 1.97× its world share, 11 worksHealth ProfessionsMedicine: 1.51× its world share, 63 worksMedicineNursing: 0.86× its world share, 1 worksNursingVeterinary: 0.37× its world share, 0 worksVeterinaryArts and Humanities: 0.21× its world share, 1 worksArts and HumanitiesBusiness, Management and Accounting: 0.16× its world share, 1 worksBusiness, Management…Decision Sciences: 0.15× its world share, 0 worksDecision SciencesEconomics, Econometrics and Finance: 0.28× its world share, 1 worksEconomics, Econometr…Psychology: 8.77× its world share, 58 worksPsychologySocial Sciences: 0.45× its world share, 12 worksSocial Sciences1×world share
more than its size predictsabout as predictedless

Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Neuroscience, 12.4×. Every wedge is a field page.

Who are the top researchers at National Institute of Mental Health?

Ranked on the composite score, Tadashi Takeshima, Masatoshi Inagaki and Makiko Kaga lead among researchers whose main affiliation is National Institute of Mental Health.

  1. 1 Tadashi Takeshima Japan · #155,865 worldwide 189 citations · 22 works
  2. 2 Masatoshi Inagaki Japan · #415,629 worldwide 92 citations · 37 works
  3. 3 Makiko Kaga Japan · #981,108 worldwide 9 citations · 31 works
  4. 4 Masumi Inagaki Japan · #1,092,866 worldwide 14 citations · 27 works
All ranked researchers at National Institute of Mental Health

Which keywords describe research at National Institute of Mental Health?

By fractional works in 2022–2025, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Depression, Epidemiology, Mental Health, Neurobiology, Neurological Disorders, Anxiety, Prevalence and Genetics.

▲ more of its work than of the world’s◆ about the world’s share▼ less than the world’s

Size is fractional works in 2022–2025 in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.

All 40 words, with their numbers
  1. Epidemiology28▲ 3.2×43 topics
  2. Depression25▲ 13×21 topics
  3. Mental Health19▲ 5.9×27 topics
  4. Neurobiology12▲ 22×9 topics
  5. Neurological Disorders12▲ 9.6×14 topics
  6. Anxiety12▲ 11×11 topics
  7. Genetics11▲ 7.2×9 topics
  8. Prevalence11▲ 12×10 topics
  9. Metabolic Syndrome11▲ 6.0×13 topics
  10. Social Cognition10▲ 27×7 topics
  11. Psychological Distress10▲ 18×4 topics
  12. Meta-Analysis10▲ 7.5×11 topics
  13. Cognitive Therapy9▲ 39×3 topics
  14. Emotion Regulation8▲ 12×8 topics
  15. Mental Disorders8▲ 32×3 topics
  16. Adolescents8▲ 9.8×7 topics
  17. Functional Connectivity8▲ 27×3 topics
  18. Stress7▲ 9.1×9 topics
  19. Psychometric Evaluation7▲ 36×2 topics
  20. Neurodevelopmental Disorders7▲ 25×6 topics
  21. Circadian Rhythms7▲ 31×2 topics
  22. Emotion Recognition6▲ 16×4 topics
  23. Antipsychotic Drugs6▲ 74×1 topic
  24. Cognitive Behavioral Therapy6▲ 22×2 topics
  25. Neurocognitive Deficits6▲ 74×1 topic
  26. Neuroimaging6▲ 11×8 topics
  27. Psychopathology6▲ 16×3 topics
  28. Neuroanatomy6▲ 28×4 topics
  29. Psychological Impact6▲ 8.2×5 topics
  30. Brain Connectivity6▲ 28×2 topics
  31. Resilience6▲ 5.5×9 topics
  32. Synaptic Plasticity6▲ 11×5 topics
  33. Neural Plasticity5▲ 14×4 topics
  34. Cognitive Impairment5▲ 9.6×7 topics
  35. Health Consequences5▲ 8.5×3 topics
  36. Default Mode Network5▲ 32×1 topic
  37. Healthcare Workers5▲ 9.4×3 topics
  38. Resting-State fMRI5▲ 32×1 topic
  39. Anxiety Disorders5▲ 20×2 topics
  40. Brain Development5▲ 12×6 topics

Which research topics does National Institute of Mental Health publish most on?

By volume in 2022–2025: Schizophrenia research and treatment, Functional Brain Connectivity Studies, Sleep and related disorders and COVID-19 and Mental Health.

  1. 1 Schizophrenia research and treatment Psychiatry and Mental health 6 works
  2. 2 Functional Brain Connectivity Studies Cognitive Neuroscience 5 works
  3. 3 Sleep and related disorders Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 5 works
  4. 4 COVID-19 and Mental Health Clinical Psychology 4 works
  5. 5 Autism Spectrum Disorder Research Cognitive Neuroscience 4 works
  6. 6 Mental Health Treatment and Access Social Psychology 4 works
  7. 7 Mental Health Research Topics Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 3 works
  8. 8 Suicide and Self-Harm Studies Clinical Psychology 3 works
  9. 9 Neural dynamics and brain function Cognitive Neuroscience 3 works
  10. 10 Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research Clinical Psychology 3 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available44.9%not open55.1%

World: 28% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors39.9%domestic only60.1%

World: 19% is written across borders.

How has National Institute of Mental Health's research output changed?

Output in 2018–2022 was 40% higher than in 2013–2017.

1990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Other research institutions in Tokyo

All research institutions in Tokyo

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.