Science Explorer Interactive view Map
Company · Pine Grove · United States

Native American Cancer Initiatives (United States)

natamcancerinitiatives.orgROR OpenAlex
Research works
65
▲ 567% vs 2013–17
Citations
446
6.9 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
14.4%
record average 16.5%
Open access
30%
world 28%

Not ranked overall: Native American Cancer Initiatives (United States) is under the volume floor below which an excellence rate is noise. Not ranked is not the same as ranked last.

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 1.19× its world share, 0 worksBiochemistry, Geneti…Immunology and Microbiology: 3.15× its world share, 0 worksImmunology and Micro…Computer Science: 0.33× its world share, 0 worksComputer ScienceHealth Professions: 0.48× its world share, 0 worksHealth ProfessionsMedicine: 3.40× its world share, 2 worksMedicineArts and Humanities: 0.88× its world share, 0 worksArts and HumanitiesEconomics, Econometrics and Finance: 0.46× its world share, 0 worksEconomics, Econometr…Psychology: 1.04× its world share, 0 worksPsychologySocial Sciences: 1.15× its world share, 0 worksSocial Sciences1×world share
more than its size predictsabout as predictedless

Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Medicine, 3.4×. Every wedge is a field page.

Which keywords describe research at Native American Cancer Initiatives (United States)?

By fractional works in all years, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Risk Factors, Health Disparities, Cancer Incidence, Global Surveillance, Mortality Rates, Curriculum Development, Education and Multiculturalism.

▲ more of its work than of the world’s◆ about the world’s share▼ less than the world’s

Size is fractional works in all years in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.

All 40 words, with their numbers
  1. Risk Factors5▲ 7.9×4 topics
  2. Health Disparities5▲ 37×3 topics
  3. Cancer Incidence4▲ 48×2 topics
  4. Globalization4▲ 3.7×4 topics
  5. Education4▲ 5.2×4 topics
  6. Global Surveillance4▲ 173×1 topic
  7. Mortality Rates4▲ 72×1 topic
  8. Curriculum Development4▲ 17×4 topics
  9. Multiculturalism3▲ 33×2 topics
  10. Online Learning3▲ 11×2 topics
  11. Religious Education3▲ 57×2 topics
  12. Character Development3▲ 76×1 topic
  13. Pancasila3▲ 204×1 topic
  14. Cancer Therapy3▲ 6.5×5 topics
  15. Health Equity2▲ 21×3 topics
  16. Metabolism2▲ 5.5×3 topics
  17. Angiogenesis2▲ 8.1×4 topics
  18. Cardiovascular Disease2▲ 3.0×4 topics
  19. Quality of Life2▲ 2.5×8 topics
  20. Public Health2▲ 2.4×7 topics
  21. Type 2 Diabetes2▲ 17×3 topics
  22. Genetic Mutations2▲ 6.0×9 topics
  23. Digital Transformation2▲ 11×2 topics
  24. Behavioral Economics2▲ 43×1 topic
  25. Caffeine2▲ 214×1 topic
  26. Coffee2▲ 214×1 topic
  27. Consumer Policy2▲ 540×1 topic
  28. Ethics2▲ 5.7×4 topics
  29. PET Imaging2▲ 12×2 topics
  30. Tumor Microenvironment2▲ 7.3×3 topics
  31. Social Justice2▲ 4.7×4 topics
  32. Prevention2▲ 6.0×4 topics
  33. Policy1▲ 13×2 topics
  34. Fibroblast Activation Protein1▲ 40×1 topic
  35. Immunosuppression1▲ 18×1 topic
  36. Decolonization1▲ 23×1 topic
  37. Health Promotion1▲ 6.5×2 topics
  38. Indigenous Health1▲ 152×1 topic
  39. Social Determinants of Health1▲ 8.1×2 topics
  40. Health System Performance1▲ 111×1 topic

Which research topics does Native American Cancer Initiatives (United States) publish most on?

By volume in 2022–2025: Global Cancer Incidence and Screening, Global Health and Surgery, Ethics in Clinical Research and Phonocardiography and Auscultation Techniques.

Global Cancer Incidence …0Global Cancer Incidence and Screening: 0 fractional worksGlobal Health and Surgery: 0 fractional worksEthics in Clinical Research: 0 fractional worksPhonocardiography and Au…0Phonocardiography and Auscultation Techniques: 0 fractional worksInfluenza Virus Research Studies: 0 fractional worksHealth, Work, and Social Studies in Poland: 0 fractional worksVaccine Coverage and Hesitancy: 0 fractional worksFacial Rejuvenation and Surgery Techniques: 0 fractional worksPolish Historical and Cultural Studies: 0 fractional worksBacterial Infections and Vaccines: 0 fractional works
OncologyPublic Health, Environmental and Occupational HealthPulmonary and Respiratory MedicineEpidemiology5 others

Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.

  1. 1 Global Cancer Incidence and Screening Oncology 0 works
  2. 2 Global Health and Surgery Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 0 works
  3. 3 Ethics in Clinical Research Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 0 works
  4. 4 Phonocardiography and Auscultation Techniques Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 0 works
  5. 5 Influenza Virus Research Studies Epidemiology 0 works
  6. 6 Health, Work, and Social Studies in Poland Social Psychology 0 works
  7. 7 Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy Health 0 works
  8. 8 Facial Rejuvenation and Surgery Techniques Dermatology 0 works
  9. 9 Polish Historical and Cultural Studies Political Science and International Relations 0 works
  10. 10 Bacterial Infections and Vaccines Microbiology 0 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available30.0%not open70.0%

World: 28% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors65.4%domestic only34.6%

World: 19% is written across borders.

How has Native American Cancer Initiatives (United States)'s research output changed?

Output in 2018–2022 was 567% higher than in 2013–2017.

1990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.