- Research works
- 13 ▲ 64% vs 2018-21
- Citations
- 173 13.0 per fractional work
- Top-10% rate
- 5.9% all institutions 10.0%
- Open access
- 32% world 40%
- International
- 24% world 18%
Not ranked overall: Oak Foundation is under the volume floor below which an excellence rate is noise. Not ranked is not the same as ranked last.
Which fields of science does Oak Foundation work in?
In all years, 37% of research at Oak Foundation is in Life Sciences, 26% in Social Sciences. Its largest fields are Agricultural and Biological Sciences (19%), Social Sciences (12%), Environmental Science (11%). It does 1.6× the world's share of Life Sciences.
Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields, their subfields. Size is fractional works in all years. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.
Its 4 domains and 14 fields, with their numbers
- Life Sciences536.5%
- Social Sciences325.8%
- Social Sciences211.9%
- Arts and Humanities15.5%
- Psychology14.6%
- Business, Management and Accounting03.8%
- Physical Sciences320.1%
- Environmental Science211.5%
- Chemistry14.6%
- Computer Science02.5%
- Earth and Planetary Sciences01.5%
- Health Sciences217.6%
- Medicine19.4%
- Health Professions17.6%
- Veterinary00.6%
Field profile
Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.
Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Environmental Science, 6.2×. Every wedge is a field page.
All 9 fields, with their numbers
- Environmental Science6.20×1 works
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences5.87×1 works
- Arts and Humanities2.52×0 works
- Earth and Planetary Sciences2.32×0 works
- Health Professions1.48×0 works
- Psychology1.19×0 works
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology1.14×0 works
- Computer Science0.94×0 works
- Medicine0.50×0 works
Which research topics does Oak Foundation publish most on?
By volume in 2022-now: Landscape and Cultural Studies, Rural development and sustainability, Entomological Studies and Ecology and Forest Insect Ecology and Management.
Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.
- 1 Landscape and Cultural Studies Archeology 0 works
- 2 Rural development and sustainability General Agricultural and Biological Sciences 0 works
- 3 Entomological Studies and Ecology Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 0 works
- 4 Forest Insect Ecology and Management Ecology 0 works
- 5 Coleoptera: Cerambycidae studies Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 0 works
- 6 Academic Research and Education Studies Global and Planetary Change 0 works
- 7 3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage Geology 0 works
- 8 Wildlife Ecology and Conservation Ecology 0 works
- 9 Video Surveillance and Tracking Methods Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 0 works
- 10 Plant and animal studies Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 0 works
How open and international is its research?
Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.
World: 40% of research is openly available.
World: 18% is written across borders.
How has Oak Foundation's research output changed?
Output in 2022-2025 was 64% higher than in 2018-2021.
The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Its share of all research
Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is Oak Foundation as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.0000043% in 2024.
Fractional works of Oak Foundation over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.
Other research institutions in Chapel Hill
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
- Communities In Schools of Orange County
- Rho (United States)
- Chapel Hill Carrboro City Schools
- Horizon Research (United States)
- IntraHealth International
- Bruce Technologies (United States)
- Clinical Tools, Inc.
Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.
Discussion
Ask a question or share a note about Oak Foundation. Posts are plain text and can be reported.