- Research works
- 4 ▲ 116% vs 2013–17
- Citations
- 13 2.9 per fractional work
- Top-10% rate
- 0.0% record average 16.5%
- Open access
- 81% world 28%
Not ranked overall: Population Health Research Network is under the volume floor below which an excellence rate is noise. Not ranked is not the same as ranked last.
Field profile
Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.
Which research topics does Population Health Research Network publish most on?
By volume in 2022–2025: Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies, Clinical practice guidelines implementation, Ethics in Clinical Research and Semantic Web and Ontologies.
Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.
- 1 Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies Molecular Biology 1 works
- 2 Clinical practice guidelines implementation Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 0 works
- 3 Ethics in Clinical Research Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 0 works
- 4 Semantic Web and Ontologies Artificial Intelligence 0 works
- 5 Research Data Management Practices Information Systems 0 works
- 6 Medical Coding and Health Information Health Information Management 0 works
- 7 Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation Issues, ethics and legal aspects 0 works
- 8 Electronic Health Records Systems Health Information Management 0 works
How open and international is its research?
Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.
World: 28% of research is openly available.
World: 19% is written across borders.
How has Population Health Research Network's research output changed?
Output in 2018–2022 was 116% higher than in 2013–2017.
The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Other research institutions in Crawley
Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.