Qualifications and Curriculum Authority
- Research works
- 22 ▼ 75% vs 2013–17
- Citations
- 673 30.1 per fractional work
- Top-10% rate
- 0.0% record average 16.5%
- Open access
- 19% world 28%
Not ranked overall: Qualifications and Curriculum Authority is under the volume floor below which an excellence rate is noise. Not ranked is not the same as ranked last.
Field profile
Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.
Which keywords describe research at Qualifications and Curriculum Authority?
By fractional works in all years, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Informal Learning, Vocational Education, Education, Academic Achievement, Student Retention, Training Pathways, Lifelong Learning and Student Achievement.
- Teacher Quality
- Student Perceptions
- School Engagement
- Gramsci
- Career Development
- Workplace Learning
- Educational Inequality
- Student Engagement
- Formative Assessment
- Professional Learning Communities
- Recognition
- Learning Outcomes
- Higher Education
- Student Retention
- Academic Achievement
- Vocational Education
- Informal Learning
- Education
- Lifelong Learning
- Training Pathways
- Student Achievement
- Prior Learning
- Student Perception
- Feedback
- STEM Education
- Education Policy
- Neoliberalism
- Activity Theory
- Communities of Practice
- Hegemony
- Socioeconomic Status
- Student-Teacher Relationships
Size is fractional works in all years in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 32 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.
All 32 words, with their numbers
- Informal Learning3▲ 126×2 topics
- Vocational Education3▲ 172×2 topics
- Education2▲ 8.2×6 topics
- Academic Achievement2▲ 70×3 topics
- Lifelong Learning2▲ 66×3 topics
- Student Retention2▲ 239×1 topic
- Training Pathways2▲ 285×1 topic
- Higher Education2▲ 26×2 topics
- Student Achievement2▲ 113×3 topics
- Learning Outcomes2▲ 38×2 topics
- Prior Learning2▲ 339×1 topic
- Recognition2▲ 220×1 topic
- Student Perception2▲ 175×2 topics
- Professional Learning Communities2▲ 167×2 topics
- Feedback2▲ 123×1 topic
- Formative Assessment2▲ 197×1 topic
- STEM Education2▲ 25×4 topics
- Student Engagement2▲ 27×3 topics
- Education Policy1▲ 101×2 topics
- Educational Inequality1▲ 96×2 topics
- Neoliberalism1▲ 17×2 topics
- Workplace Learning1▲ 313×2 topics
- Activity Theory1▲ 392×1 topic
- Career Development1▲ 51×2 topics
- Communities of Practice1▲ 262×1 topic
- Gramsci1▲ 785×1 topic
- Hegemony1▲ 165×1 topic
- School Engagement1▲ 99×1 topic
- Socioeconomic Status1▲ 61×1 topic
- Student Perceptions1▲ 32×2 topics
- Student-Teacher Relationships1▲ 99×1 topic
- Teacher Quality1▲ 222×1 topic
Which research topics does Qualifications and Curriculum Authority publish most on?
By volume in 2022–2025: Education Systems and Policy, Occupational health in dentistry, Higher Education Learning Practices and Regional Development and Policy.
Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.
- 1 Education Systems and Policy Education 0 works
- 2 Occupational health in dentistry Medical Laboratory Technology 0 works
- 3 Higher Education Learning Practices Education 0 works
- 4 Regional Development and Policy Political Science and International Relations 0 works
- 5 Workplace Health and Well-being General Health Professions 0 works
- 6 Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation Pharmacology 0 works
How open and international is its research?
Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.
World: 28% of research is openly available.
World: 19% is written across borders.
How has Qualifications and Curriculum Authority's research output changed?
Output in 2018–2022 was 75% lower than in 2013–2017.
The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.