Science Explorer Back to mapMap
Discussion

Innovative Education and Learning Practices

Innovative Education and Learning Practices is a research topic within Human Factors and Ergonomics. Science Explorer counts 13k research works in it since 1951. 10.1% of them reached the world's top 10% most cited for their field and year.

This cluster of papers explores workplace learning, informal and formal learning, communities of practice, expansive learning, and the application of activity theory in understanding learning in professional work settings. It delves into the role of Vygotsky's theories, boundary crossing, and tacit knowledge in shaping learning experiences within organizations.

  • Workplace Learning
  • Activity Theory
  • Informal Learning
  • Communities of Practice
  • Expansive Learning
  • Vygotsky
  • Professional Work
  • Boundary Crossing
  • Formal Learning
  • Tacit Knowledge
Research works
13k
fractional, since 1951
In the world top 10%
1.3k
per year above
Top-10% rate
10.1%
share of its works in the world top 10%
Growth, 2018-21 → 2022-25
+19%
the tick is no change
Largest producer
United States
26% of the 10 largest, 2022-now
Innovative Education and Learning Practices

Which countries lead Innovative Education and Learning Practices research?

By volume, the United States and the United Kingdom publish the most (531 and 387 works in 2022-now).

By volume, 2022-now

  1. 1 United States 531 works
  2. 2 United Kingdom 387 works
  3. 3 Australia 237 works
  4. 4 China 165 works
  5. 5 Norway 139 works
  6. 6 Sweden 137 works
  7. 7 Germany 132 works
  8. 8 South Africa 123 works
  9. 9 Canada 120 works
  10. 10 Denmark 94 works

How concentrated that is

The same countries as shares of everything the list above accounts for. A node where two countries do two thirds of the work and one spread evenly across twelve read alike as a ranking and not at all alike here.

United States: 25.7%United Kingdom: 18.7%Australia: 11.5%China: 8.0%6 others listed: 36.1%26%largest
United States531 · 25.7%United Kingdom387 · 18.7%Australia237 · 11.5%China165 · 8.0%6 others listed745 · 36.1%

Shares of the rows listed above, not of the whole node.

Which institutions lead Innovative Education and Learning Practices research?

By volume in 2022-now, Monash University publishes the most Innovative Education and Learning Practices research, followed by University of Gothenburg and Griffith University.

Who are the leading researchers in Innovative Education and Learning Practices?

The most-cited researchers publishing on Innovative Education and Learning Practices include Étienne Wenger.

  1. 1 Étienne Wenger United States 146k citations

Ranked by citations received across their whole record, among researchers with at least three works on this topic.

What are the most cited papers in Innovative Education and Learning Practices?

The most cited paper in Innovative Education and Learning Practices is "Toward a Theory of Social Practices" (Andreas Reckwitz, 2002), with 5,470 citations. Next come "The Action Research Planner: Doing Critical Participatory Action Research" (3,417) and "Vygotsky and the Social Formation of Mind" (3,358).

Most cited papers
#PaperReleasedCitations
1 Toward a Theory of Social Practices Andreas Reckwitz · European Journal of Social Theory May 2002 5,470
2 The Action Research Planner: Doing Critical Participatory Action Research Stephen Kemmis, Robin McTaggart, Rhonda Nixon 12 Nov 2013 3,417
3 Vygotsky and the Social Formation of Mind Alex Kozulin, James V. Wertsch · The American Journal of Psychology 1987 3,358
4 Design-Based Research: Putting a Stake in the Ground Sasha Alexander Barab, Kurt D. Squire · Journal of the Learning Sciences 2004 2,610
5 Informal learning in the workplace Michael R. Eraut · Studies in Continuing Education Open access Jul 2004 2,580
All 100 most cited papers, with filters and sorting

Where is Innovative Education and Learning Practices research done?

The largest centres of Innovative Education and Learning Practices research in 2022-now are London (United Kingdom), Melbourne (Australia), Brisbane (Australia) and Oslo (Norway).

Largest cities, 2022-now

  1. 1 LondonUnited Kingdom 64 works
  2. 2 MelbourneAustralia 53 works
  3. 3 BrisbaneAustralia 45 works
  4. 4 OsloNorway 42 works
  5. 5 SydneyAustralia 35 works
  6. 6 BeijingChina 34 works
  7. 7 AarhusDenmark 29 works
  8. 8 SingaporeSingapore 24 works
  9. 9 GothenburgSweden 23 works
  10. 10 StockholmSweden 23 works
See Innovative Education and Learning Practices on the map

Where is the best place to study Innovative Education and Learning Practices?

Among universities, judged by research, Monash University, University College London and University of Jyväskylä score highest, combining excellence, specialisation, size, growth and international reach. Research strength is one signal when choosing where to study; it does not measure teaching.

0%10%20%30%mean 16.06%fractional works in this field (log) →share of work in the world top 10% →University College L…Monash UniversityGriffith UniversityUniversity of Jyväsk…
above the meannear itbelow it

One dot per university in the first ten of the table below, at the default weights. The upper left is the interesting corner: small places doing unusually strong work.

Excellenceshare of its work in the world top 10%, 2022-now and all time averaged
40%
Specialisationhow much of its work is in this field, counted up to 10× the world share
10%
Sizeits output in this field, on a log scale
30%
Growthoutput growth, counted from -20% to +20%
10%
Internationalshare of its work with a co-author abroad
10%
Each slider sets a weight; the share it gets of the score is beside it.
#UniversityScoreTop 10%SpecialisationWorksGrowth
1Monash UniversityAustralia 71.719.6%8.2×22 -10.5%
2University College LondonUnited Kingdom 69.426.4%3.3×15 -19.5%
3University of JyväskyläFinland 66.713.1%26.4×13 +28.1%
4Griffith UniversityAustralia 66.415.0%17.0×20 -17.7%
5University of GothenburgSweden 64.311.3%15.3×20 +15.1%
6Linköping UniversitySweden 62.09.0%23.6×18 +29.5%
7Stockholm UniversitySweden 62.014.5%16.4×16 +10.8%
8University of HelsinkiFinland 62.015.9%7.2×14 -46.2%
9Education University of Hong KongChina 58.618.7%22.2×9 +72.4%
10University of ManchesterUnited Kingdom 55.917.1%4.8×11 +59.2%

Universities only. The score blends excellence (40%), size (30%), specialisation (10%), growth (10%), international reach (10%), 2022-now; growth compares 2018-21 with 2022-25 and counts up to +20%, since a jump from a small base is mostly noise.

Every institution in Innovative Education and Learning Practices, country by country

Is Innovative Education and Learning Practices research growing?

Output in 2022-2025 was 19% higher than in 2018-2021, peaking in 2025. The fastest-growing topics are Innovative Education and Learning Practices.

still counting19801990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Its share of all research

Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is Innovative Education and Learning Practices as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.012% in 2024.

still counting0.010%0.020%Innovative Education and Learning Practices0.015% in 202519801990200020102020

Fractional works of Innovative Education and Learning Practices over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.

How much of it reaches the world top 10%

Year by year.

still counting5%10%15%Innovative Education and Learning Practices10.2% in 2025200020102020

Of each year's works in it, the share that reached the world's 10% most cited for their field and year. A field is the world for its own topics, so there is no other line to hold it against.

Which topics inside it are moving

Growth and decline on one axis around a shared zero. Two lists side by side hide the thing that matters: whether the growth dwarfs the decline, or the other way round.

Discussion

Ask a question or share a note about Innovative Education and Learning Practices. Posts are plain text and can be reported.