Umeå University
In research, Umeå University stands highest in Health Sciences (#261 of 9,902 worldwide), Social Sciences (#293 of 9,585 worldwide) and Medicine (#272 of 8,541 worldwide), 2022-now. Relative to its size it is most specialised in Human-Computer Interaction and Safety Research (Human-Computer Interaction is 3.1× its share of world research).
- World rank, 2022-now
- #325 of 22,385 · #455 all time
- Rank in Sweden
- #8 of 107
- Research works
- 43k ▲ 3% vs 2018-21
- Citations
- 1.6M 36.2 per fractional work
- Top-10% rate
- 13.0% all institutions 10.0%
- vs its own fields
- 1.11× 1.00× is exactly expected
- Open access
- 42% world 40%
- International
- 24% world 18%
What is Umeå University known for in research?
The fields where it stands highest, 2022-now, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.
| Field | World rank | Where that sits | Top-10% rate | Works | All time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Health SciencesDomain | #261 of 9,902 | 13.4% | 1,601 | #309 | |
| Social SciencesDomain | #293 of 9,585 | 15.0% | 1,532 | #510 | |
| MedicineField | #272 of 8,541 | 13.3% | 1,281 | #302 | |
| Social SciencesField | #228 of 5,988 | 16.0% | 821 | #425 | |
| Life SciencesDomain | #316 of 6,403 | 11.2% | 754 | #361 | |
| Physical SciencesDomain | #597 of 10,670 | 11.8% | 1,279 | #855 | |
| Sociology and Political ScienceSubfield | #186 of 2,526 | 17.7% | 266 | #377 | |
| Computer ScienceField | #335 of 4,417 | 11.9% | 387 | #807 | |
| EducationSubfield | #162 of 1,930 | 14.9% | 188 | #260 | |
| Health ProfessionsField | #163 of 1,895 | 14.4% | 255 | #199 |
Each strip is that field's whole ranked pool, with the notch where Umeå University sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no average mark, because the average differs by field (from about 6% in Dentistry to 21% in Economics).
Which of those standings moved
The same fields on both windows: where it stood over the whole record, and where it stands in 2022-now. The distance is the story, and it is the one thing the two rank columns above cannot show.
- Health Sciences#309 #261
- Social Sciences#510 #293
- Medicine#302 #272
- Social Sciences#425 #228
- Life Sciences#361 #316
- Physical Sciences#855 #597
- Sociology and Political Science#377 #186
- Computer Science#807 #335
- Education#260 #162
- Health Professions#199 #163
A dot further right is a better standing. Fields it was not ranked in over the whole record are left out.
Which fields of science does Umeå University work in?
In 2022-now, 31% of research at Umeå University is in Health Sciences, 29% in Social Sciences. Its largest fields are Medicine (25%), Social Sciences (16%), Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (8%). It does 1.4× the world's share of Health Sciences.
Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields, their subfields. Size is fractional works in 2022-now. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.
Its 4 domains and 26 fields, with their numbers
- Health Sciences1,85731.3%
- Medicine1,48325.0%
- Health Professions2975.0%
- Dentistry380.6%
- Nursing340.6%
- Veterinary40.1%
- Social Sciences1,73429.2%
- Social Sciences93615.8%
- Psychology3566.0%
- Arts and Humanities1712.9%
- Business, Management and Accounting1141.9%
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance871.5%
- Decision Sciences691.2%
- Physical Sciences1,46024.6%
- Computer Science4367.3%
- Environmental Science3305.6%
- Engineering2985.0%
- Earth and Planetary Sciences841.4%
- Physics and Astronomy841.4%
- Materials Science751.3%
- Mathematics701.2%
- Chemistry410.7%
- Energy340.6%
- Chemical Engineering80.1%
- Life Sciences88814.9%
What does Umeå University specialise in?
Where its research is concentrated relative to its size: Human-Computer Interaction takes 3.1× the share of its output that it takes of world research.
- Human-Computer InteractionSubfield · 37.6 works3.1×
- Safety ResearchSubfield · 46.2 works2.8×
Location quotient, a volume reading rather than an impact one. It surfaces small, lopsided specialities.
Field profile
Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.
Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Psychology, 2.0×. Every wedge is a field page.
All 26 fields, with their numbers
- Psychology1.97×356 works
- Health Professions1.90×297 works
- Neuroscience1.54×148 works
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology1.51×477 works
- Dentistry1.32×38 works
- Medicine1.30×1,483 works
- Social Sciences1.25×936 works
- Decision Sciences1.21×69 works
- Nursing1.19×34 works
- Environmental Science1.12×330 works
- Immunology and Microbiology1.04×62 works
- Mathematics1.00×70 works
- Arts and Humanities1.00×171 works
- Computer Science0.94×436 works
- Earth and Planetary Sciences0.90×84 works
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences0.69×195 works
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance0.69×87 works
- Physics and Astronomy0.63×84 works
- Energy0.62×34 works
- Business, Management and Accounting0.60×114 works
- Veterinary0.50×4 works
- Chemistry0.44×41 works
- Chemical Engineering0.36×8 works
- Materials Science0.36×75 works
- Engineering0.33×298 works
- Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics0.27×6 works
- Psychology 2.0×
- Health Professions 1.9×
- Neuroscience 1.5×
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1.5×
- Dentistry 1.3×
- Medicine 1.3×
- Social Sciences 1.2×
- Decision Sciences 1.2×
- Nursing 1.2×
- Environmental Science 1.1×
- Immunology and Microbiology 1.0×
- Mathematics 1.0×
- Arts and Humanities 1.0×
- Computer Science 0.9×
- Earth and Planetary Sciences 0.9×
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences 0.7×
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance 0.7×
- Physics and Astronomy 0.6×
- Energy 0.6×
- Business, Management and Accounting 0.6×
- Veterinary 0.5×
- Chemistry 0.4×
- Chemical Engineering 0.4×
- Materials Science 0.4×
- Engineering 0.3×
- Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics 0.3×
Who are the top researchers at Umeå University?
Ranked on the quality score, Helena Edlund, Göran Hallmans and Joacim Rocklöv lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Umeå University.
- 1
Helena Edlund
Sweden · #8,787 worldwide 32k citations · 163 works
- 2
Göran Hallmans
Sweden · #17,524 worldwide 35k citations · 321 works
- 3
Joacim Rocklöv
Sweden · #17,592 worldwide 35k citations · 310 works
- 4
Roland S. Johansson
Sweden · #28,800 worldwide 31k citations · 219 works
- 5
Å. B. Vallbo
Sweden · #30,614 worldwide 16k citations · 93 works
- 6
Christofer Åström
Sweden · #31,273 worldwide 8.3k citations · 83 works
- 7
Bertil Forsberg
Sweden · #40,145 worldwide 39k citations · 571 works
- 8
Hans Wolf‐Watz
Sweden · #41,446 worldwide 17k citations · 167 works
- 9
Peter Munch Andersen
Sweden · #42,382 worldwide 30k citations · 416 works
- 10
Dmitry Shungin
Sweden · #43,724 worldwide 26k citations · 86 works
Which keywords describe research at Umeå University?
By fractional works in 2022-now, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Epidemiology, Climate Change, Mental Health, Quality of Life, Public Health, Cardiovascular Disease, Inflammation and Risk Factors.
- Quantitative Methods
- Academic Achievement
- Special Education
- Discourse Analysis
- Health Disparities
- Neoliberalism
- Pedagogy
- Ethics
- Health Effects
- Well-being
- Artificial Intelligence
- Diagnosis
- Social Media
- Oxidative Stress
- Education
- Cardiovascular Disease
- Globalization
- Quality of Life
- Inflammation
- Climate Change
- Epidemiology
- Machine Learning
- Mental Health
- Public Health
- Deep Learning
- Risk Factors
- Treatment
- Depression
- Qualitative Research
- Global Burden
- Genetics
- Management
- Mortality
- Anxiety
- Prevalence
- Social Sciences
- Surveillance
- Mortality Risk
- Gender Studies
- Methodology
Size is fractional works in 2022-now in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Epidemiology352▲ 1.49×130 topics
- Climate Change223▲ 1.38×92 topics
- Machine Learning164▼ 0.83×74 topics
- Inflammation163▲ 1.29×81 topics
- Mental Health150▲ 1.76×37 topics
- Quality of Life150▲ 1.74×51 topics
- Public Health148▲ 1.70×57 topics
- Globalization143▲ 1.23×89 topics
- Deep Learning132▼ 0.64×69 topics
- Cardiovascular Disease131▲ 1.94×36 topics
- Risk Factors122▲ 1.87×36 topics
- Education110◆ 1.08×62 topics
- Treatment107▲ 1.48×51 topics
- Oxidative Stress106◆ 1.08×56 topics
- Depression101▲ 1.94×22 topics
- Social Media93◆ 1.13×32 topics
- Qualitative Research89▲ 1.77×23 topics
- Diagnosis88▲ 1.59×40 topics
- Global Burden86▲ 2.7×12 topics
- Artificial Intelligence85◆ 1.00×35 topics
- Genetics75▲ 1.79×27 topics
- Well-being72▲ 3.1×14 topics
- Management72▲ 1.52×31 topics
- Health Effects68▲ 1.91×21 topics
- Mortality66▲ 1.97×13 topics
- Ethics64▲ 2.1×33 topics
- Anxiety64▲ 2.2×11 topics
- Pedagogy60▲ 2.0×16 topics
- Prevalence53▲ 2.2×15 topics
- Neoliberalism52▲ 2.5×19 topics
- Social Sciences52▲ 6.1×9 topics
- Health Disparities51▲ 3.3×9 topics
- Surveillance50▲ 3.0×5 topics
- Discourse Analysis45▲ 3.1×8 topics
- Mortality Risk44▲ 3.1×6 topics
- Special Education42▲ 12×4 topics
- Gender Studies40▲ 4.4×7 topics
- Academic Achievement40▲ 3.9×9 topics
- Methodology39▲ 13×3 topics
- Quantitative Methods38▲ 48×1 topic
Which research topics does Umeå University publish most on?
By volume in 2022-now: Social and Educational Sciences, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research, Ethics and Social Impacts of AI and Asthma and respiratory diseases.
Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.
- 1 Social and Educational Sciences Education 38 works
- 2 Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 28 works
- 3 Ethics and Social Impacts of AI Safety Research 27 works
- 4 Asthma and respiratory diseases Physiology 24 works
- 5 Health disparities and outcomes Health 23 works
- 6 Indigenous Studies and Ecology General Health Professions 22 works
- 7 Innovative Human-Technology Interaction Human-Computer Interaction 22 works
- 8 Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes General Health Professions 20 works
- 9 Air Quality and Health Impacts Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 19 works
- 10 Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data Artificial Intelligence 19 works
How open and international is its research?
Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.
World: 40% of research is openly available.
World: 18% is written across borders.
How has Umeå University's research output changed?
Output in 2022-2025 was 3% higher than in 2018-2021.
The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Its share of all research
Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is Umeå University as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.023% in 2024.
Fractional works of Umeå University over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.
How much of it reaches the world top 10%
Year by year, against all institutions in the same year.
Of each year's output, the share that reached the world's 10% most cited for its field and year. Peak 15.4% in 2011.
Other research institutions in Umeå
- Centre for Biomedical Engineering and Physics
- Västerbotten County
- Boréa (Sweden)
- LunaLEC (Sweden)
- Algoryx Simulation (Sweden)
- SweTree Technologies (Sweden)
- Västerbottens Läns Landsting
- Umeå Municipality
Which institutions have research most like Umeå University's?
Among the world's leading institutions, University of Gothenburg has the research profile closest to Umeå University's, with both strong in Psychology.
- 1
University of Gothenburg
Sweden · Both strong in Psychology, Neuroscience, Health Professions 0.85 Compare
- 2
University of Bergen
Norway · Both strong in Psychology, Neuroscience, Dentistry 0.81 Compare
- 3
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Netherlands · Both strong in Psychology, Neuroscience, Health Professions 0.77 Compare
- 4
Boston University
United States · Both strong in Psychology, Health Professions, Neuroscience 0.74 Compare
- 5
Indiana University
United States · Both strong in Psychology, Neuroscience, Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 0.74 Compare
Similarity is the correlation of each side's location quotients across every field it publishes in, on a log scale: 1 is the same shape of research, 0 is unrelated. It ignores size. How it is measured.
Compare Umeå University with
- vs
University of Lisbon
- vs
Instituto de Salud Carlos III
- vs
University of Dundee
- vs
Shaanxi Normal University
- vs
Yunnan University
- vs
University of Notre Dame
Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.
Discussion
Ask a question or share a note about Umeå University. Posts are plain text and can be reported.
