Research Center for Humanities and Social Sciences, Academia Sinica
In research, Research Center for Humanities and Social Sciences, Academia Sinica stands highest in Social Sciences (#7,679 of 16,945 worldwide), over all time.
- World rank, 2022–2025
- #23,049 of 28,054 · #28,757 all time
- Rank in Taiwan
- #196 of 221
- Research works
- 263 ▲ 38% vs 2013–17
- Citations
- 3.3k 12.7 per fractional work
- Top-10% rate
- 22.7% record average 16.5%
- Open access
- 43% world 28%
What is Research Center for Humanities and Social Sciences, Academia Sinica known for in research?
The fields where it stands highest, over all time, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.
| Field | World rank | Where that sits | Top-10% rate | Works |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Social SciencesDomain | #7,679 of 16,945 | 27.7% | 165 |
Each strip is that field’s whole ranked pool, with the notch where Research Center for Humanities and Social Sciences, Academia Sinica sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no world mark, because the world rate differs by field (from about 6% to 21% in this record).
Field profile
Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.
Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Psychology, 3.2×. Every wedge is a field page.
- Psychology 3.2×
- Social Sciences 2.8×
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2.5×
- Health Professions 2.3×
- Arts and Humanities 2.0×
- Business, Management and Accounting 1.2×
- Environmental Science 1.2×
- Dentistry 1.0×
- Mathematics 0.9×
- Computer Science 0.8×
- Decision Sciences 0.8×
- Earth and Planetary Sciences 0.7×
- Neuroscience 0.7×
- Physics and Astronomy 0.6×
- Materials Science 0.5×
- Energy 0.4×
- Medicine 0.4×
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences 0.2×
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 0.2×
- Engineering 0.2×
- Chemistry 0.1×
- Immunology and Microbiology 0.1×
Who are the top researchers at Research Center for Humanities and Social Sciences, Academia Sinica?
Ranked on the composite score, Ta‐Chien Chan and Ming‐Chang Tsai lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Research Center for Humanities and Social Sciences, Academia Sinica.
- 1 Ta‐Chien Chan Taiwan · #994,489 worldwide 57 citations · 25 works
- 2 Ming‐Chang Tsai Taiwan · #1,503,626 worldwide 12 citations · 20 works
Which keywords describe research at Research Center for Humanities and Social Sciences, Academia Sinica?
By fractional works in 2022–2025, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Globalization, Economic Development, Nationalism, Well-being, Cultural Identity, Positive Psychology, Mental Health and Emotion.
- Self-Efficacy
- Gender Roles
- Social Networks
- Health Behavior
- China
- Information Technology
- Positive Emotions
- Health Outcomes
- Democracy
- Labor Market
- Identification
- Democratization
- Empathy
- Resilience
- Colonialism
- Emotion
- Cultural Identity
- Public Health
- Nationalism
- Mental Health
- Globalization
- Economic Development
- Social Media
- Well-being
- Positive Psychology
- Social Support
- Health Effects
- Life Satisfaction
- Political Economy
- Transportation
- Narrative Persuasion
- Subjective Well-Being
- Identity
- Happiness
- Inequality
- Urbanization
- Civic Education
- Hong Kong Identity
- Civil Society
- Online Communication
Size is fractional works in 2022–2025 in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Globalization8▲ 5.2×17 topics
- Mental Health5▲ 4.0×11 topics
- Economic Development5▲ 6.9×9 topics
- Nationalism4▲ 11×6 topics
- Social Media4▲ 3.4×9 topics
- Public Health4▲ 3.3×10 topics
- Well-being4▲ 12×5 topics
- Cultural Identity4▲ 8.6×3 topics
- Positive Psychology4▲ 54×3 topics
- Emotion3▲ 20×3 topics
- Social Support3▲ 7.3×8 topics
- Colonialism3▲ 8.5×10 topics
- Health Effects3▲ 6.7×4 topics
- Resilience3▲ 8.3×4 topics
- Life Satisfaction3▲ 54×2 topics
- Empathy3▲ 32×3 topics
- Political Economy3▲ 13×5 topics
- Democratization3▲ 51×2 topics
- Transportation3▲ 19×3 topics
- Identification3▲ 133×1 topic
- Narrative Persuasion3▲ 133×1 topic
- Labor Market2▲ 9.7×4 topics
- Subjective Well-Being2▲ 40×2 topics
- Democracy2▲ 7.7×5 topics
- Identity2▲ 3.9×6 topics
- Health Outcomes2▲ 9.8×5 topics
- Happiness2▲ 51×1 topic
- Positive Emotions2▲ 21×1 topic
- Inequality2▲ 10×3 topics
- Information Technology2▲ 4.8×2 topics
- Urbanization2▲ 5.7×4 topics
- China2▲ 24×2 topics
- Civic Education2▲ 96×1 topic
- Health Behavior2▲ 21×3 topics
- Hong Kong Identity2▲ 255×1 topic
- Social Networks2▲ 8.1×2 topics
- Civil Society2▲ 18×3 topics
- Gender Roles2▲ 17×3 topics
- Online Communication2▲ 14×2 topics
- Self-Efficacy2▲ 7.6×3 topics
Which research topics does Research Center for Humanities and Social Sciences, Academia Sinica publish most on?
By volume in 2022–2025: Media Influence and Health, Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction, Hong Kong and Taiwan Politics and Asian Culture and Media Studies.
Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.
- 1 Media Influence and Health Literature and Literary Theory 3 works
- 2 Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction Social Psychology 2 works
- 3 Hong Kong and Taiwan Politics Sociology and Political Science 2 works
- 4 Asian Culture and Media Studies Cultural Studies 2 works
- 5 Noise Effects and Management Speech and Hearing 2 works
- 6 Migration and Labor Dynamics Sociology and Political Science 1 works
- 7 China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance Political Science and International Relations 1 works
- 8 Optimism, Hope, and Well-being Applied Psychology 1 works
- 9 Air Quality and Health Impacts Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 1 works
- 10 Globalization, Economics, and Policies Economics and Econometrics 1 works
How open and international is its research?
Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.
World: 28% of research is openly available.
World: 19% is written across borders.
How has Research Center for Humanities and Social Sciences, Academia Sinica's research output changed?
Output in 2018–2022 was 38% higher than in 2013–2017.
The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Other research institutions in Taipei
- National Taiwan University
- National Taiwan University of Science and Technology
- National Taiwan University Hospital
- National Taipei University of Technology
- Academia Sinica
- Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
- National Taiwan Normal University
- Taipei Veterans General Hospital
Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.