- World rank, all time
- #9,908 of 42,892
- Rank in Portugal
- #46 of 234
- Research works
- 489 ▼ 66% vs 2013–17
- Citations
- 8.3k 17.0 per fractional work
- Top-10% rate
- 7.0% record average 16.5%
- Open access
- 17% world 28%
What is TARH (Portugal) known for in research?
The fields where it stands highest, over all time, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.
| Field | World rank | Where that sits | Top-10% rate | Works |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Physical SciencesDomain | #6,106 of 21,541 | 15.2% | 393 |
Each strip is that field’s whole ranked pool, with the notch where TARH (Portugal) sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no world mark, because the world rate differs by field (from about 6% to 21% in this record).
Field profile
Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.
Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Energy, 7.7×. Every wedge is a field page.
- Energy 7.7×
- Earth and Planetary Sciences 5.2×
- Chemistry 2.6×
- Engineering 2.0×
- Environmental Science 1.8×
- Decision Sciences 1.8×
- Health Professions 1.8×
- Arts and Humanities 1.3×
- Medicine 1.0×
- Business, Management and Accounting 0.7×
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences 0.6×
- Materials Science 0.5×
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 0.3×
- Social Sciences 0.3×
- Computer Science 0.2×
Who are the top researchers at TARH (Portugal)?
Ranked on the composite score, M. C. Freitas, M.A. Gouveia and M. Luísa Botelho lead among researchers whose main affiliation is TARH (Portugal).
- 1 M. C. Freitas Portugal · #847,262 worldwide 73 citations · 32 works
- 2 M.A. Gouveia Portugal · #1,003,863 worldwide 53 citations · 15 works
- 3 M. Luísa Botelho Portugal · #1,407,236 worldwide 13 citations · 17 works
Which keywords describe research at TARH (Portugal)?
By fractional works in all years, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Health Effects, Toxicity, Radionuclides, Tomography, Ionizing Radiation, Superconductivity, Neutron Imaging and Small-Angle Scattering.
- Quantitative Analysis
- Soil
- Bioremediation
- Actinides
- X-ray Absorption
- Contamination
- Raman Spectroscopy
- Photodetectors
- Air Pollution
- Heavy Metals
- Fukushima Daiichi
- Electronic Structure
- Environmental Impacts
- Semiconductors
- Radon
- Small-Angle Scattering
- Lung Cancer
- Ionizing Radiation
- Environmental Impact
- Toxicity
- Health Effects
- Radionuclides
- Tomography
- Superconductivity
- Neutron Imaging
- Depleted Uranium
- Nanostructures
- Nanowires
- Crystal Growth
- Antioxidant Activity
- nuclear accident
- Spectroscopy
- Thin Films
- Spintronics
- Remediation
- Solar Cells
- Bioavailability
- Adsorption
- Health Risk
- Band Parameters
Size is fractional works in all years in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Health Effects45▲ 15×9 topics
- Toxicity38▲ 18×7 topics
- Radionuclides36▲ 138×2 topics
- Environmental Impact26▲ 4.0×17 topics
- Tomography26▲ 19×4 topics
- Ionizing Radiation25▲ 57×2 topics
- Superconductivity25▲ 16×9 topics
- Lung Cancer23▲ 29×3 topics
- Neutron Imaging23▲ 59×1 topic
- Small-Angle Scattering23▲ 37×1 topic
- Depleted Uranium23▲ 168×1 topic
- Radon23▲ 168×1 topic
- Nanostructures21▲ 8.9×14 topics
- Semiconductors19▲ 15×5 topics
- Nanowires18▲ 16×4 topics
- Environmental Impacts17▲ 16×4 topics
- Crystal Growth16▲ 9.9×10 topics
- Electronic Structure16▲ 15×6 topics
- Antioxidant Activity14▲ 5.2×7 topics
- Fukushima Daiichi13▲ 105×1 topic
- nuclear accident13▲ 105×1 topic
- Heavy Metals13▲ 14×3 topics
- Spectroscopy13▲ 8.1×6 topics
- Air Pollution12▲ 22×2 topics
- Thin Films12▲ 9.3×7 topics
- Photodetectors12▲ 26×2 topics
- Spintronics12▲ 12×4 topics
- Raman Spectroscopy12▲ 10×5 topics
- Remediation11▲ 31×2 topics
- Contamination11▲ 25×2 topics
- Solar Cells10▲ 7.0×7 topics
- X-ray Absorption10▲ 57×2 topics
- Bioavailability10▲ 12×3 topics
- Actinides10▲ 27×2 topics
- Adsorption10▲ 8.8×3 topics
- Bioremediation10▲ 14×2 topics
- Health Risk10▲ 36×1 topic
- Soil10▲ 36×1 topic
- Band Parameters10▲ 16×2 topics
- Quantitative Analysis10▲ 12×2 topics
Which research topics does TARH (Portugal) publish most on?
By volume in 2022–2025: HVDC Systems and Fault Protection, Renewable energy and sustainable power systems, Building materials and conservation and Acute Kidney Injury Research.
Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.
- 1 HVDC Systems and Fault Protection Electrical and Electronic Engineering 0 works
- 2 Renewable energy and sustainable power systems Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment 0 works
- 3 Building materials and conservation Earth-Surface Processes 0 works
- 4 Acute Kidney Injury Research Nephrology 0 works
- 5 Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis Emergency Medical Services 0 works
- 6 Islanding Detection in Power Systems Electrical and Electronic Engineering 0 works
- 7 Recycling and Waste Management Techniques Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering 0 works
- 8 Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 0 works
- 9 Wind Turbine Control Systems Electrical and Electronic Engineering 0 works
- 10 Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 0 works
How open and international is its research?
Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.
World: 28% of research is openly available.
World: 19% is written across borders.
How has TARH (Portugal)'s research output changed?
Output in 2018–2022 was 66% lower than in 2013–2017.
The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.