Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis is a research topic within Emergency Medical Services. Science Explorer counts 37k research works in it since 1950. 15.6% of them reached the world's top 10% most cited for their field and year.
This cluster of papers focuses on the management and complications of vascular access in healthcare, including catheter-related infections, central venous catheterization, hemodialysis vascular access, arteriovenous fistulas, and guidelines for preventing intravascular device-related infections. The papers cover a wide range of topics related to the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of complications associated with various types of vascular access.
- Catheter-Related Infections
- Central Venous Catheterization
- Hemodialysis Vascular Access
- Arteriovenous Fistulas
- Intravascular Device-Related Infections
- Vascular Access Guidelines
- Catheter-Related Bloodstream Infections
- Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters
- Vascular Access Complications
- Ultrasound-Guided Vascular Cannulation
- Research works
- 37k fractional, since 1950
- In the world top 10%
- 5.7k per year above
- Top-10% rate
- 15.6% share of its works in the world top 10%
- Growth, 2013–17 → 2018–22
- +22% the tick is no change
This ranks research output and citation impact. It says nothing about the quality of diagnosis, treatment or care.
Which countries lead Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis research?
By volume, the United States and China publish the most (1.7k and 667 works in 2022–2025).
By volume, 2022–2025
- 1 United States 1.7k works
- 2 China 667 works
- 3 India 402 works
- 4 Japan 349 works
- 5 Brazil 290 works
- 6 Italy 258 works
- 7 United Kingdom 257 works
- 8 Spain 215 works
- 9 Türkiye 203 works
- 10 Australia 185 works
How concentrated that is
The same countries as shares of everything the list above accounts for. A node where two countries do two thirds of the work and one spread evenly across twelve read alike as a ranking and not at all alike here.
Shares of the rows listed above, not of the whole node.
Which institutions lead Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis research?
By volume in 2022–2025, All India Institute of Medical Sciences publishes the most Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis research, followed by Ain Shams University and Cleveland Clinic.
By volume, 2022–2025
- 1 All India Institute of Medical SciencesIndia 26 works
- 2 Ain Shams UniversityEgypt 21 works
- 3 Cleveland ClinicUnited States 19 works
- 4 Sağlık Bilimleri ÜniversitesiTürkiye 18 works
- 5 Sichuan UniversityChina 18 works
- 6 St. Joseph’s University Medical CenterUnited States 18 works
- 7 Yale UniversityUnited States 17 works
- 8 Icahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiUnited States 16 works
- 9 Harvard UniversityUnited States 15 works
- 10 The University of QueenslandAustralia 15 works
Who are the leading researchers in Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis?
The most-cited researchers publishing on Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis include Vivekanand Jha.
- 1 Vivekanand Jha India 5.8k citations
Ranked by citations received across their whole record, among researchers with at least three works on this topic.
Where is Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis research done?
The largest centres of Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis research in 2022–2025 are Beijing (China), Tokyo (Japan), London (United Kingdom) and New York (United States). Among places with at least 20 works in it, it is an unusually large share of all research in Birmingham.
Largest cities, 2022–2025
Where it is the local speciality
- BirminghamUS · 20.7 works5.8×
Location quotient: how much more of its research is in Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis than the world average.
Where is the best place to study Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis?
Among universities, judged by research, Griffith University, The University of Queensland and All India Institute of Medical Sciences score highest, combining excellence, specialisation, size, growth and international reach. Research strength is one signal when choosing where to study; it does not measure teaching.
One dot per university in the table below. The upper left is the interesting corner: small places doing unusually strong work.
| # | University | Score | Top 10% | Specialisation | Works | Growth |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Griffith UniversityAustralia | 57.6 | 28.9% | 5.2× | 13 | +398.5% |
| 2 | The University of QueenslandAustralia | 52.7 | 32.7% | 2.9× | 15 | +120.9% |
| 3 | All India Institute of Medical SciencesIndia | 46.9 | 7.2% | 6.8× | 26 | +53.4% |
| 4 | Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and ResearchIndia | 45.7 | 4.8% | 7.2× | 15 | +203.0% |
| 5 | Ain Shams UniversityEgypt | 43.3 | 1.9% | 4.5× | 21 | +345.7% |
| 6 | Icahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiUnited States | 42.3 | 8.2% | 5.1× | 16 | +151.6% |
| 7 | Sağlık Bilimleri ÜniversitesiTürkiye | 37.8 | 5.9% | 5.1× | 18 | — |
| 8 | Yale UniversityUnited States | 36.2 | 12.7% | 2.7× | 17 | +83.4% |
| 9 | University of Alabama at BirminghamUnited States | 35.5 | 15.7% | 5.0× | 15 | -8.5% |
| 10 | Baylor College of MedicineUnited States | 33.7 | 14.1% | 5.0× | 13 | +18.1% |
Universities only. Score blends excellence (30%), specialisation (25%), size (20%), growth (15%) and international reach (10%), 2015–2022; growth compares 2010–14 with 2015–19.
Is Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis research growing?
Output in 2018–2022 was 22% higher than in 2013–2017, peaking in 2025. The fastest-growing topics are Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis.
The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Which topics inside it are moving
Growth and decline on one axis around a shared zero. Two lists side by side hide the thing that matters: whether the growth dwarfs the decline, or the other way round.