- Research works
- 21 ▲ 23% vs 2013–17
- Citations
- 151 7.3 per fractional work
- Top-10% rate
- 0.0% record average 16.5%
- Open access
- 86% world 28%
Not ranked overall: U-center is under the volume floor below which an excellence rate is noise. Not ranked is not the same as ranked last.
Field profile
Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.
Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Social Sciences, 5.0×. Every wedge is a field page.
Who are the top researchers at U-center?
Ranked on the composite score, Sônia Maria de Barros Marques lead among researchers whose main affiliation is U-center.
- 1 Sônia Maria de Barros Marques Netherlands · #1,139,077 worldwide 0 citations · 15 works
Which keywords describe research at U-center?
By fractional works in all years, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Teacher Training, Sustainability, Design, Urbanism, Qualitative Research, Brazil, Curriculum Development and Discourse Analysis.
- Interdisciplinary Education
- Arts
- Aesthetics
- Solidarity Economy
- Sexuality
- Family Farming
- Human Rights
- Epidemiology
- Discourse Analysis
- Brazil
- Urbanism
- Teacher Training
- Sustainability
- Design
- Qualitative Research
- Curriculum Development
- Constitutional Law
- Globalization
- Agriculture
- Gender
- Social Management
- Machine Learning
- Architecture
- Contemporary Art
- Modernism
Size is fractional works in all years in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 25 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.
All 25 words, with their numbers
- Sustainability2▲ 6.1×2 topics
- Teacher Training2▲ 25×3 topics
- Design2▲ 81×2 topics
- Urbanism2▲ 310×2 topics
- Qualitative Research2▲ 16×2 topics
- Brazil2▲ 98×3 topics
- Curriculum Development1▲ 19×2 topics
- Discourse Analysis1▲ 30×2 topics
- Constitutional Law1▲ 49×1 topic
- Epidemiology1▲ 1.54×8 topics
- Globalization1▲ 3.5×2 topics
- Human Rights1▲ 7.5×1 topic
- Agriculture1▲ 24×1 topic
- Family Farming1▲ 185×1 topic
- Gender1▲ 9.9×1 topic
- Sexuality1▲ 77×1 topic
- Social Management1▲ 235×1 topic
- Solidarity Economy1▲ 87×1 topic
- Machine Learning1▲ 2.5×4 topics
- Aesthetics1▲ 67×1 topic
- Architecture1▲ 403×1 topic
- Arts1▲ 713×1 topic
- Contemporary Art1▲ 408×1 topic
- Interdisciplinary Education1▲ 713×1 topic
- Modernism1▲ 196×1 topic
Which research topics does U-center publish most on?
By volume in 2022–2025: Gender, Sexuality, and Education, Social and Economic Solidarity, Rural Development and Agriculture and Science and Education Research.
Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.
- 1 Gender, Sexuality, and Education Gender Studies 1 works
- 2 Social and Economic Solidarity Sociology and Political Science 1 works
- 3 Rural Development and Agriculture Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 1 works
- 4 Science and Education Research Education 1 works
- 5 Education and Digital Technologies Sociology and Political Science 1 works
- 6 Education Pedagogy and Practices Education 1 works
- 7 Migration, Racism, and Human Rights Health 0 works
- 8 Male Reproductive Health Studies General Health Professions 0 works
- 9 Youth, Drugs, and Violence Demography 0 works
- 10 Occupational Health and Burnout Occupational Therapy 0 works
How open and international is its research?
Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.
World: 28% of research is openly available.
World: 19% is written across borders.
How has U-center's research output changed?
Output in 2018–2022 was 23% higher than in 2013–2017.
The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.