Science Explorer Interactive view Map

Male Reproductive Health Studies

Male Reproductive Health Studies is a research topic within General Health Professions. Science Explorer counts 11k research works in it since 1950. 15.1% of them reached the world's top 10% most cited for their field and year.

This cluster of papers explores various aspects of men's reproductive health, including vasectomy safety and effectiveness, disparities in healthcare utilization between men and women, chronic orchialgia, gender perspectives in primary care, and the association between vasectomy and prostate cancer. The research also delves into contraceptive sterilization, family planning, and the impact of societal perceptions on men's healthcare decisions.

  • Vasectomy
  • Men's Health
  • Primary Care
  • Reproductive Health
  • Chronic Orchialgia
  • Gender Perspectives
  • Contraceptive Sterilization
  • Healthcare Utilization
  • Prostate Cancer
  • Family Planning
Research works
11k
fractional, since 1950
In the world top 10%
1.7k
per year above
Top-10% rate
15.1%
share of its works in the world top 10%
Growth, 2013–17 → 2018–22
+40%
the tick is no change

This ranks research output and citation impact. It says nothing about the quality of diagnosis, treatment or care.

Which countries lead Male Reproductive Health Studies research?

By volume, Brazil and the United States publish the most (1.4k and 299 works in 2022–2025).

By volume, 2022–2025

  1. 1 Brazil 1.4k works
  2. 2 United States 299 works
  3. 3 China 74 works
  4. 4 Portugal 62 works
  5. 5 Türkiye 60 works
  6. 6 United Kingdom 45 works
  7. 7 Spain 43 works
  8. 8 India 42 works
  9. 9 France 37 works
  10. 10 Italy 36 works

How concentrated that is

The same countries as shares of everything the list above accounts for. A node where two countries do two thirds of the work and one spread evenly across twelve read alike as a ranking and not at all alike here.

Brazil: 66.5%United States: 14.3%China: 3.6%Portugal: 3.0%6 others listed: 12.6%67%largest
Brazil1,389 · 66.5%United States299 · 14.3%China74 · 3.6%Portugal62 · 3.0%6 others listed264 · 12.6%

Shares of the rows listed above, not of the whole node.

Which institutions lead Male Reproductive Health Studies research?

By volume in 2022–2025, Universidade de São Paulo publishes the most Male Reproductive Health Studies research, followed by Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais and Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro.

Who are the leading researchers in Male Reproductive Health Studies?

The most-cited researchers publishing on Male Reproductive Health Studies include Déborah Carvalho Malta and Ashok Agarwal.

  1. 1 Déborah Carvalho Malta Brazil 5.5k citations
  2. 2 Ashok Agarwal United States 1.4k citations

Ranked by citations received across their whole record, among researchers with at least three works on this topic.

Where is Male Reproductive Health Studies research done?

The largest centres of Male Reproductive Health Studies research in 2022–2025 are São Paulo (Brazil), Rio de Janeiro (Brazil), Belo Horizonte (Brazil) and Brasília (Brazil).

Largest cities, 2022–2025

  1. 1 São Paulo Brazil 178 works
  2. 2 Rio de Janeiro Brazil 145 works
  3. 3 Belo Horizonte Brazil 62 works
  4. 4 Brasília Brazil 54 works
  5. 5 Salvador Brazil 47 works
  6. 6 Belém Brazil 44 works
  7. 7 Recife Brazil 44 works
  8. 8 Fortaleza Brazil 38 works
  9. 9 Curitiba Brazil 32 works
  10. 10 Lisbon Portugal 27 works
See Male Reproductive Health Studies on the map

Where is the best place to study Male Reproductive Health Studies?

Among universities, judged by research, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro and Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro score highest, combining excellence, specialisation, size, growth and international reach. Research strength is one signal when choosing where to study; it does not measure teaching.

0%5%10%mean 5.8%fractional works in this node (log) →share in the world top 10% →Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais: 25, 9.8%Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro: 21, 9.2%Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro: 23, 6.6%Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP): 17, 8.0%Universidade de Brasília: 21, 4.9%Universidade Federal Fluminense: 17, 3.4%Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina: 19, 4.7%Universidade Estadual de Feira de Santana: 12, 6.1%Universitario Francisco de Asís: 11, 4.5%Universidade do Estado do Pará: 21, 0.8%Universidade Federal…Universidade Federal…Universidade Estadua…Universidade do Esta…
above the meannear itbelow it

One dot per university in the table below. The upper left is the interesting corner: small places doing unusually strong work.

#UniversityScoreTop 10%SpecialisationWorksGrowth
1 Universidade Federal de Minas GeraisBrazil 82.29.8%13.5×25 +73.5%
2 Universidade Federal do Rio de JaneiroBrazil 73.29.2%10.7×21 +4.2%
3 Universidade do Estado do Rio de JaneiroBrazil 67.26.6%20.2×23 +19.5%
4 Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)Brazil 66.88.0%8.7×17 +93.5%
5 Universidade de BrasíliaBrazil 65.34.9%14.3×21 +91.3%
6 Universidade Federal FluminenseBrazil 62.23.4%14.2×17 +172.2%
7 Universidade Federal de Santa CatarinaBrazil 61.44.7%12.2×19 +59.4%
8 Universidade Estadual de Feira de SantanaBrazil 60.16.1%39.3×12 +106.2%
9 Universitario Francisco de AsísUruguay 60.04.5%58.6×11
10 Universidade do Estado do ParáBrazil 59.90.8%64.3×21 +568.4%

Universities only. Score blends excellence (30%), specialisation (25%), size (20%), growth (15%) and international reach (10%), 2015–2022; growth compares 2010–14 with 2015–19.

Is Male Reproductive Health Studies research growing?

Output in 2018–2022 was 40% higher than in 2013–2017, peaking in 2025. The fastest-growing topics are Male Reproductive Health Studies.

19801990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Which topics inside it are moving

Growth and decline on one axis around a shared zero. Two lists side by side hide the thing that matters: whether the growth dwarfs the decline, or the other way round.