U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences
- World rank, all time
- #28,320 of 42,892
- Rank in United States
- #6,078 of 8,685
- Research works
- 218 ▲ 12% vs 2013–17
- Citations
- 6.5k 29.9 per fractional work
- Top-10% rate
- 13.3% record average 16.5%
- Open access
- 17% world 28%
Field profile
Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.
Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Psychology, 13.9×. Every wedge is a field page.
- Psychology 13.9×
- Neuroscience 3.1×
- Decision Sciences 3.0×
- Health Professions 2.2×
- Business, Management and Accounting 1.4×
- Immunology and Microbiology 1.2×
- Physics and Astronomy 1.2×
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 0.8×
- Medicine 0.8×
- Social Sciences 0.7×
- Computer Science 0.6×
- Mathematics 0.5×
- Engineering 0.1×
- Environmental Science 0.1×
Who are the top researchers at U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences?
Ranked on the composite score, Paula J. Durlach lead among researchers whose main affiliation is U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences.
- 1 Paula J. Durlach United States · #300,352 worldwide 141 citations · 18 works
Which keywords describe research at U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences?
By fractional works in all years, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Learning Outcomes, Human Factors, Trust, Meta-Analysis, Driver Behavior, Cognitive Load, Automation and Driver Distraction.
- Training Motivation
- Unmanned Aerial Vehicles
- Performance Improvement
- Verification and Validation
- Metamodeling
- Risk Perception
- Instructional Design
- Autonomous Systems
- Shared Mental Models
- Complex Adaptive Systems
- Motivation
- Agent-Based Modeling
- Knowledge Sharing
- Social Interaction
- System Maturity
- Leadership
- Automation
- Risk Assessment
- Trust
- Human Factors
- Learning Outcomes
- Meta-Analysis
- Driver Behavior
- Cognitive Load
- Driver Distraction
- Product Development
- Technology Readiness Levels
- Decision Making
- STEM Education
- Virtual Reality
- Student Engagement
- Gender Differences
- Team Processes
- Bayesian Networks
- Organizational Learning
- Intrinsic Motivation
- Simulation Optimization
- Employee Development
- Behavioral Interventions
- Intelligent Tutoring Systems
Size is fractional works in all years in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Learning Outcomes11▲ 22×6 topics
- Human Factors9▲ 73×2 topics
- Meta-Analysis9▲ 7.2×5 topics
- Trust8▲ 15×4 topics
- Driver Behavior8▲ 59×2 topics
- Risk Assessment8▲ 5.9×3 topics
- Cognitive Load8▲ 90×2 topics
- Automation7▲ 58×1 topic
- Driver Distraction7▲ 116×1 topic
- Leadership7▲ 9.5×9 topics
- Product Development7▲ 52×2 topics
- System Maturity7▲ 141×1 topic
- Technology Readiness Levels7▲ 141×1 topic
- Social Interaction6▲ 11×4 topics
- Decision Making6▲ 12×5 topics
- Knowledge Sharing6▲ 17×4 topics
- STEM Education6▲ 9.8×3 topics
- Agent-Based Modeling6▲ 17×6 topics
- Virtual Reality5▲ 6.5×7 topics
- Motivation5▲ 7.3×6 topics
- Student Engagement5▲ 8.3×7 topics
- Complex Adaptive Systems5▲ 54×2 topics
- Gender Differences5▲ 6.7×6 topics
- Shared Mental Models5▲ 149×1 topic
- Team Processes5▲ 149×1 topic
- Autonomous Systems4▲ 65×2 topics
- Bayesian Networks4▲ 23×3 topics
- Instructional Design4▲ 21×2 topics
- Organizational Learning4▲ 22×4 topics
- Risk Perception4▲ 9.6×3 topics
- Intrinsic Motivation4▲ 19×4 topics
- Metamodeling4▲ 38×2 topics
- Simulation Optimization4▲ 68×1 topic
- Verification and Validation4▲ 68×1 topic
- Employee Development4▲ 68×2 topics
- Performance Improvement4▲ 54×2 topics
- Behavioral Interventions3▲ 16×2 topics
- Unmanned Aerial Vehicles3▲ 15×2 topics
- Intelligent Tutoring Systems3▲ 30×2 topics
- Training Motivation3▲ 119×1 topic
Which research topics does U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences publish most on?
By volume in 2022–2025: Team Dynamics and Performance, Stress and Burnout Research, Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare and Software Engineering Techniques and Practices.
Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.
- 1 Team Dynamics and Performance Social Psychology 1 works
- 2 Stress and Burnout Research Social Psychology 0 works
- 3 Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare Physiology 0 works
- 4 Software Engineering Techniques and Practices Information Systems 0 works
- 5 Workplace Health and Well-being General Health Professions 0 works
- 6 Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 0 works
- 7 Military History and Strategy Political Science and International Relations 0 works
- 8 Human-Automation Interaction and Safety Social Psychology 0 works
- 9 Muscle metabolism and nutrition Cell Biology 0 works
- 10 Human Resource Development and Performance Evaluation Applied Psychology 0 works
How open and international is its research?
Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.
World: 28% of research is openly available.
World: 19% is written across borders.
How has U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences's research output changed?
Output in 2018–2022 was 12% higher than in 2013–2017.
The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Other research institutions in Fort Belvoir
- Alexander T. Augusta Military Medical Center
- Missile Defense Agency
- Defense Threat Reduction Agency
- Defense Logistics Agency
- Defense Acquisition University
- Defense Technical Information Center
- Defense Contract Audit Agency
Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.