Team Dynamics and Performance
Team Dynamics and Performance is a research topic within Social Psychology. Science Explorer counts 16k research works in it since 1950. 10.2% of them reached the world's top 10% most cited for their field and year.
This cluster of papers explores the temporal dynamics, cognitive processes, and performance outcomes of team collaboration, with a focus on shared mental models, virtual teams, transactive memory systems, and group communication. It delves into the challenges and strategies for effective teamwork in global, virtual, and distributed settings, emphasizing the importance of leadership, knowledge sharing, and cognitive diversity in enhancing team effectiveness.
- Team Processes
- Shared Mental Models
- Virtual Teams
- Transactive Memory Systems
- Group Communication
- Team Effectiveness
- Global Collaboration
- Leadership in Teams
- Knowledge Sharing
- Cognitive Diversity
- Research works
- 16k fractional, since 1950
- In the world top 10%
- 1.6k per year above
- Top-10% rate
- 10.2% share of its works in the world top 10%
- Growth, 2018-21 → 2022-25
- +7% the tick is no change
- Largest producer
United States
40% of the 10 largest, 2022-now
Which countries lead Team Dynamics and Performance research?
By volume, the United States and China publish the most (711 and 250 works in 2022-now).
By volume, 2022-now
- 1
United States 711 works
- 2
China 250 works
- 3
Germany 231 works
- 4
United Kingdom 137 works
- 5
Netherlands 83 works
- 6
Japan 82 works
- 7
Canada 74 works
- 8
India 68 works
- 9
Australia 66 works
- 10
France 65 works
How concentrated that is
The same countries as shares of everything the list above accounts for. A node where two countries do two thirds of the work and one spread evenly across twelve read alike as a ranking and not at all alike here.
Shares of the rows listed above, not of the whole node.
Which institutions lead Team Dynamics and Performance research?
By volume in 2022-now, Pennsylvania State University publishes the most Team Dynamics and Performance research, followed by Arizona State University and Clemson University.
By volume, 2022-now
- 1
Pennsylvania State University
United States 16 works
- 2
Arizona State University
United States 14 works
- 3
Clemson University
United States 12 works
- 4
United States Department of Defense
United States 11 works
- 5
Aarhus University
Denmark 11 works
- 6
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
France 11 works
- 7
University of Michigan
United States 10 works
- 8
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Netherlands 9 works
- 9
Cornell University
United States 9 works
- 10
University of Central Florida
United States 9 works
Who are the leading researchers in Team Dynamics and Performance?
The most-cited researchers publishing on Team Dynamics and Performance include David A. Kenny, Arnold B. Bakker and Roy Frederick Baumeister.
- 1
David A. Kenny
United States 198k citations
- 2
Arnold B. Bakker
Netherlands 189k citations
- 3
Roy Frederick Baumeister
United States 183k citations
- 4
Herbert A. Simon
United States 179k citations
Ranked by citations received across their whole record, among researchers with at least three works on this topic.
Where is Team Dynamics and Performance research done?
The largest centres of Team Dynamics and Performance research in 2022-now are Beijing (China), Tokyo (Japan), London (United Kingdom) and Shanghai (China).
Largest cities, 2022-now
- 1
Beijing
China 53 works
- 2
Tokyo
Japan 31 works
- 3
London
United Kingdom 28 works
- 4
Shanghai
China 26 works
- 5
Seoul
South Korea 23 works
- 6
New York
United States 21 works
- 7
Munich
Germany 20 works
- 8
Amsterdam
Netherlands 17 works
- 9
Nanjing
China 17 works
- 10
State College
United States 16 works
Where is the best place to study Team Dynamics and Performance?
Among universities, judged by research, Clemson University, Arizona State University and Pennsylvania State University score highest, combining excellence, specialisation, size, growth and international reach. Research strength is one signal when choosing where to study; it does not measure teaching.
One dot per university in the first ten of the table below, at the default weights. The upper left is the interesting corner: small places doing unusually strong work.
| # | University | Score | Top 10% | Specialisation | Works | Growth |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Clemson University |
77.0 | 26.8% | 19.0× | 12 | +24.1% |
| 2 | Arizona State University |
69.3 | 21.4% | 9.8× | 14 | -6.2% |
| 3 | Pennsylvania State University |
59.9 | 13.3% | 6.6× | 16 | +16.1% |
| 4 | Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam |
49.4 | 9.8% | 10.2× | 9 | +124.3% |
| 5 | University of Michigan |
47.4 | 20.0% | 2.9× | 10 | +12.3% |
| 6 | Carnegie Mellon University |
37.6 | 13.5% | 9.4× | 9 | -48.3% |
| 7 | Aarhus University |
31.5 | 9.5% | 5.8× | 11 | -2.5% |
| 8 | University of Central Florida |
29.2 | 11.5% | 10.7× | 9 | -5.3% |
| 9 | Cornell University |
16.6 | 4.1% | 3.1× | 9 | -31.6% |
Universities only. The score blends excellence (40%), size (30%), specialisation (10%), growth (10%), international reach (10%), 2022-now; growth compares 2018-21 with 2022-25 and counts up to +20%, since a jump from a small base is mostly noise.
Every institution in Team Dynamics and Performance, country by countryIs Team Dynamics and Performance research growing?
Output in 2022-2025 was 7% higher than in 2018-2021, peaking in 2025. The fastest-growing topics are Team Dynamics and Performance.
The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Its share of all research
Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is Team Dynamics and Performance as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.0094% in 2024.
Fractional works of Team Dynamics and Performance over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.
How much of it reaches the world top 10%
Year by year.
Of each year's works in it, the share that reached the world's 10% most cited for their field and year. A field is the world for its own topics, so there is no other line to hold it against.
Which topics inside it are moving
Growth and decline on one axis around a shared zero. Two lists side by side hide the thing that matters: whether the growth dwarfs the decline, or the other way round.
Discussion
Ask a question or share a note about Team Dynamics and Performance. Posts are plain text and can be reported.