Science Explorer Back to mapMap
Discussion
Archive · Kaluga · Russia

Ugra National Park

Research works
9
▼ 85% vs 2018-21
Citations
36
4.1 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
3.4%
all institutions 10.0%
Open access
89%
world 40%
International
13%
world 18%

Not ranked overall: Ugra National Park is under the volume floor below which a citation excellence rate is noise. Not ranked is not the same as ranked last.

Which fields of science does Ugra National Park work in?

In all years, 63% of research at Ugra National Park is in Life Sciences, 25% in Physical Sciences. Its largest fields are Agricultural and Biological Sciences (61%), Environmental Science (14%), Earth and Planetary Sciences (11%). It does 2.0× the world's share of Life Sciences.

Life Sciences: 6 fractional works · 63.2% of its workAgricultural and Biological Sciences: 5 fractional works · 61.3% of its workEcology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics: 4 fractional works · 41.8% of its workPlant Science: 2 fractional works · 19.4% of its workBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 0 fractional works · 1.9% of its workGenetics: 0 fractional works · 1.9% of its workPhysical Sciences: 2 fractional works · 25.3% of its workEnvironmental Science: 1 fractional works · 14.0% of its workEcology: 1 fractional works · 12.5% of its workManagement, Monitoring, Policy and Law: 0 fractional works · 1.2% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workEarth and Planetary Sciences: 1 fractional works · 11.3% of its workEarth-Surface Processes: 0 fractional works · 3.7% of its workOceanography: 0 fractional works · 3.7% of its workSpace and Planetary Science: 0 fractional works · 3.7% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workSocial Sciences: 1 fractional works · 6.9% of its workArts and Humanities: 0 fractional works · 5.6% of its workHistory: 0 fractional works · 3.7% of its workArcheology: 0 fractional works · 1.9% of its workPsychology: 0 fractional works · 1.2% of its workSocial Psychology: 0 fractional works · 1.2% of its workHealth Sciences: 0 fractional works · 4.6% of its workHealth Professions: 0 fractional works · 2.5% of its workOccupational Therapy: 0 fractional works · 1.2% of its workPhysical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation: 0 fractional works · 1.2% of its workMedicine: 0 fractional works · 2.1% of its workPediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health: 0 fractional works · 1.2% of its workPhysiology: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workALL ITS WORKUgra NationalPark9fractional works, all years
Life Sciences63%Physical Sciences25%Health Sciences5%Social Sciences7%

Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields, their subfields. Size is fractional works in all years. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.

Its 4 domains and 8 fields, with their numbers
    1. Agricultural and Biological Sciences561.3%
    2. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology01.9%
    1. Environmental Science114.0%
    2. Earth and Planetary Sciences111.3%
    1. Arts and Humanities05.6%
    2. Psychology01.2%
    1. Health Professions02.5%
    2. Medicine02.1%
All of science, and how each field's share has moved since 1950: the Science domain explorer

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

Agricultural and Biological Sciences: 1.50× its world share, 0 worksAgricultural and Bio…Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 2.68× its world share, 0 worksBiochemistry, Geneti…Environmental Science: 6.71× its world share, 0 worksEnvironmental ScienceHealth Professions: 7.23× its world share, 0 worksHealth ProfessionsMedicine: 0.87× its world share, 0 worksMedicinePsychology: 3.13× its world share, 0 worksPsychology1×world share
more than its size predictsabout as predictedless

Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Health Professions, 7.2×. Every wedge is a field page.

All 6 fields, with their numbers
  1. Health Professions7.23×0 works
  2. Environmental Science6.71×0 works
  3. Psychology3.13×0 works
  4. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology2.68×0 works
  5. Agricultural and Biological Sciences1.50×0 works
  6. Medicine0.87×0 works

Who are the top researchers at Ugra National Park?

Ranked on the quality score, Viktoria V. Teleganova lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Ugra National Park.

  1. 1 Viktoria V. Teleganova Russia · #4,137,858 worldwide 439 citations · 24 works
All ranked researchers at Ugra National Park

What are the most cited papers from Ugra National Park?

The most cited paper from Ugra National Park is "Phenological shifts of abiotic events, producers and consumers across a continent" (Tomas V. Roslin et al., 2021), with 103 citations. Next come "Differences in spatial versus temporal reaction norms for spring and autumn phenological events" (61) and "The database of the Moss flora of Russia" (60).

Most cited papers
#PaperReleasedCitations
1 Phenological shifts of abiotic events, producers and consumers across a continent Tomas V. Roslin et al. · Nature Climate Change Open access205 authors 28 Jan 2021 103
2 Differences in spatial versus temporal reaction norms for spring and autumn phenological events María del Mar Delgado et al. · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Open access203 authors 23 Nov 2020 61
3 The database of the Moss flora of Russia Oleg V. Ivanov et al. · Arctoa Open access Dec 2017 60
4 New bryophyte records Olga M. Afonina et al. · Arctoa Open access Apr 2006 44
5 New bryophyte records A. A. Abolina et al. · Arctoa Dec 2011 43
All 30 most cited papers, with filters and sorting

Which research topics does Ugra National Park publish most on?

By volume in 2022-now: Physiological and biochemical adaptations, High Altitude and Hypoxia, Physical Education and Training Studies and Spaceflight effects on biology.

  1. 1 Physiological and biochemical adaptations Ecology 0 works
  2. 2 High Altitude and Hypoxia Genetics 0 works
  3. 3 Physical Education and Training Studies Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation 0 works
  4. 4 Spaceflight effects on biology Physiology 0 works
  5. 5 Wildlife Ecology and Conservation Ecology 0 works
  6. 6 Primate Behavior and Ecology Social Psychology 0 works
  7. 7 Human Health and Disease Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 0 works
  8. 8 Occupational Health and Performance Occupational Therapy 0 works
  9. 9 Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 0 works
  10. 10 Bat Biology and Ecology Studies Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 0 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available89.0%not open11.0%

World: 40% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors13.4%domestic only86.6%

World: 18% is written across borders.

How has Ugra National Park's research output changed?

Output in 2022-2025 was 85% lower than in 2018-2021.

still counting2010201520202025
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Its share of all research

Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is Ugra National Park as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.0000046% in 2023.

0.000020%0.000040%0.000060%Ugra National Park0.0000045% in 202420102020

Fractional works of Ugra National Park over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.

Other research institutions in Kaluga

All research institutions in Kaluga

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.

Discussion

Ask a question or share a note about Ugra National Park. Keep it to the research: no personal attacks, advertising or links. Any reader can report a post, which collapses it for everyone until it is opened.