Science Explorer Back to mapMap
Discussion
Nonprofit · Salzburg · Austria

Wings for Life

wingsforlife.com/enROR OpenAlex
Research works
9
▲ 142% vs 2018-21
Citations
133
14.2 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
9.3%
all institutions 10.0%
Open access
24%
world 40%
International
29%
world 18%
Wings for Life

Not ranked overall: Wings for Life is under the volume floor below which an excellence rate is noise. Not ranked is not the same as ranked last.

Which fields of science does Wings for Life work in?

In all years, 38% of research at Wings for Life is in Social Sciences, 33% in Health Sciences. Its largest fields are Medicine (22%), Psychology (13%), Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (12%). It does 1.3× the world's share of Social Sciences.

Social Sciences: 4 fractional works · 37.7% of its workPsychology: 1 fractional works · 12.6% of its workSocial Psychology: 1 fractional works · 9.2% of its workClinical Psychology: 0 fractional works · 3.4% of its workSocial Sciences: 1 fractional works · 9.8% of its workPublic Administration: 0 fractional works · 2.7% of its workSociology and Political Science: 0 fractional works · 2.7% of its workCultural Studies: 0 fractional works · 1.2% of its workDemography: 0 fractional works · 1.2% of its workLaw: 0 fractional works · 1.2% of its workPolitical Science and International Relations: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workBusiness, Management and Accounting: 1 fractional works · 9.5% of its workManagement of Technology and Innovation: 0 fractional works · 3.5% of its workOrganizational Behavior and Human Resource Management: 0 fractional works · 3.5% of its workStrategy and Management: 0 fractional works · 2.4% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workArts and Humanities: 0 fractional works · 5.3% of its workReligious studies: 0 fractional works · 3.5% of its workGeneral Arts and Humanities: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workHistory: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workEconomics, Econometrics and Finance: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workEconomics and Econometrics: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workHealth Sciences: 3 fractional works · 33.1% of its workMedicine: 2 fractional works · 21.9% of its workPulmonary and Respiratory Medicine: 1 fractional works · 5.4% of its workNephrology: 0 fractional works · 3.5% of its workPathology and Forensic Medicine: 0 fractional works · 3.3% of its workPhysiology: 0 fractional works · 1.9% of its workSurgery: 0 fractional works · 1.7% of its workPediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health: 0 fractional works · 1.2% of its workPharmacology: 0 fractional works · 1.2% of its workPsychiatry and Mental health: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workPublic Health, Environmental and Occupational Health: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workCritical Care and Intensive Care Medicine: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workEpidemiology: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workImmunology and Allergy: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workRehabilitation: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workHealth Professions: 1 fractional works · 7.7% of its workGeneral Health Professions: 0 fractional works · 3.7% of its workSpeech and Hearing: 0 fractional works · 3.5% of its workRadiological and Ultrasound Technology: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workVeterinary: 0 fractional works · 3.5% of its workSmall Animals: 0 fractional works · 3.5% of its workLife Sciences: 2 fractional works · 19.4% of its workBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 1 fractional works · 11.9% of its workMolecular Biology: 1 fractional works · 11.9% of its workAgricultural and Biological Sciences: 0 fractional works · 4.5% of its workInsect Science: 0 fractional works · 1.8% of its workPlant Science: 0 fractional works · 1.8% of its workEcology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workNeuroscience: 0 fractional works · 3.1% of its workCellular and Molecular Neuroscience: 0 fractional works · 1.8% of its workDevelopmental Neuroscience: 0 fractional works · 1.3% of its workPhysical Sciences: 1 fractional works · 9.7% of its workEngineering: 0 fractional works · 4.9% of its workIndustrial and Manufacturing Engineering: 0 fractional works · 3.5% of its workSafety, Risk, Reliability and Quality: 0 fractional works · 1.2% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workEnvironmental Science: 0 fractional works · 3.0% of its workEnvironmental Engineering: 0 fractional works · 1.8% of its workManagement, Monitoring, Policy and Law: 0 fractional works · 1.2% of its workChemistry: 0 fractional works · 1.8% of its workSpectroscopy: 0 fractional works · 1.8% of its workALL ITS WORKWings for Life9fractional works, all years
Life Sciences19%Physical Sciences10%Health Sciences33%Social Sciences38%

Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields, their subfields. Size is fractional works in all years. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.

Its 4 domains and 14 fields, with their numbers
    1. Psychology112.6%
    2. Social Sciences19.8%
    3. Business, Management and Accounting19.5%
    4. Arts and Humanities05.3%
    5. Economics, Econometrics and Finance00.4%
    1. Medicine221.9%
    2. Health Professions17.7%
    3. Veterinary03.5%
    1. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology111.9%
    2. Agricultural and Biological Sciences04.5%
    3. Neuroscience03.1%
    1. Engineering04.9%
    2. Environmental Science03.0%
    3. Chemistry01.8%
All of science, and how each field's share has moved since 1950: the Science domain explorer

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

Engineering: 0.59× its world share, 0 worksEngineeringHealth Professions: 6.88× its world share, 1 worksHealth ProfessionsMedicine: 1.16× its world share, 1 worksMedicineVeterinary: 65.35× its world share, 0 worksVeterinaryArts and Humanities: 1.54× its world share, 0 worksArts and HumanitiesBusiness, Management and Accounting: 5.51× its world share, 1 worksBusiness, Management…Economics, Econometrics and Finance: 0.52× its world share, 0 worksEconomics, Econometr…Social Sciences: 1.46× its world share, 1 worksSocial Sciences1×world share
more than its size predictsabout as predictedless

Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Veterinary, 65.3×. Every wedge is a field page.

All 8 fields, with their numbers
  1. Veterinary65.35×0 works
  2. Health Professions6.88×1 works
  3. Business, Management and Accounting5.51×1 works
  4. Arts and Humanities1.54×0 works
  5. Social Sciences1.46×1 works
  6. Medicine1.16×1 works
  7. Engineering0.59×0 works
  8. Economics, Econometrics and Finance0.52×0 works

What are the most cited papers from Wings for Life?

The most cited paper from Wings for Life is "The current state-of-the-art of spinal cord imaging: Methods" (Patrick W. Stroman et al., 2013), with 348 citations. Next come "Experimental strategies to promote spinal cord regeneration—an integrative perspective" (208) and "The current state-of-the-art of spinal cord imaging: Applications" (208).

Most cited papers
#PaperReleasedCitations
1 The current state-of-the-art of spinal cord imaging: Methods Patrick W. Stroman et al. · NeuroImage Open access 14 May 2013 348
2 Experimental strategies to promote spinal cord regeneration—an integrative perspective Jan Markus Schwab, Klaus Brechtel, Christian-Andreas Mueller et al. · Progress in Neurobiology Feb 2006 208
3 The current state-of-the-art of spinal cord imaging: Applications Claudia A. M. Gandini Wheeler‐Kingshott et al. · NeuroImage Open access 14 Jul 2013 208
4 Lumbar spinal stenosis: syndrome, diagnostics and treatment Eberhard Siebert, Harald Prüß, Randolf Klingebiel et al. · Nature Reviews Neurology Review Jul 2009 198
5 The challenge of recruitment for neurotherapeutic clinical trials in spinal cord injury Andrew R. Blight, Jane T C Hsieh, Armin E. P. Curt et al. · Spinal Cord 8 Apr 2019 61
All 29 most cited papers, with filters and sorting

Which research topics does Wings for Life publish most on?

By volume in 2022-now: Social Work Education and Practice, Dialysis and Renal Disease Management, Religion, Society, and Development and Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare.

Social Work Education an…0Social Work Education and Practice: 0 fractional worksDialysis and Renal Disea…0Dialysis and Renal Disease Management: 0 fractional worksReligion, Society, and Development: 0 fractional worksAdolescent and Pediatric…0Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare: 0 fractional worksElectrolyte and hormonal…0Electrolyte and hormonal disorders: 0 fractional worksAnimal Behavior and Welf…0Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies: 0 fractional worksRobotic Process Automati…0Robotic Process Automation Applications: 0 fractional worksDigital Innovation in Industries: 0 fractional worksCorporate Management and Leadership: 0 fractional worksRetirement, Disability, and Employment: 0 fractional works
Public AdministrationNephrologySociology and Political ScienceSpeech and Hearing6 others

Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.

  1. 1 Social Work Education and Practice Public Administration 0 works
  2. 2 Dialysis and Renal Disease Management Nephrology 0 works
  3. 3 Religion, Society, and Development Sociology and Political Science 0 works
  4. 4 Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare Speech and Hearing 0 works
  5. 5 Electrolyte and hormonal disorders Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 0 works
  6. 6 Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies Small Animals 0 works
  7. 7 Robotic Process Automation Applications Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering 0 works
  8. 8 Digital Innovation in Industries Management of Technology and Innovation 0 works
  9. 9 Corporate Management and Leadership Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 0 works
  10. 10 Retirement, Disability, and Employment Demography 0 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available24.1%not open75.9%

World: 40% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors28.7%domestic only71.3%

World: 18% is written across borders.

How has Wings for Life's research output changed?

Output in 2022-2025 was 142% higher than in 2018-2021.

still counting2010201520202025
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Its share of all research

Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is Wings for Life as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.0000024% in 2024.

still counting0.000050%0.00010%Wings for Life0.000057% in 202519801990200020102020

Fractional works of Wings for Life over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.

Other research institutions in Salzburg

All research institutions in Salzburg

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.

Discussion

Ask a question or share a note about Wings for Life. Posts are plain text and can be reported.