Women’s Environmental Institute
In research, Women’s Environmental Institute stands highest in Engineering (#5,137 of 11,412 worldwide), Physical Sciences (#15,053 of 21,541 worldwide) and Computer Science (#6,006 of 7,020 worldwide), over all time.
- World rank, all time
- #26,618 of 42,892
- Rank in United States
- #5,707 of 8,685
- Research works
- 1.6k ▼ 65% vs 2013–17
- Citations
- 632 0.4 per fractional work
- Top-10% rate
- 0.0% record average 16.5%
- Open access
- 0% world 28%
What is Women’s Environmental Institute known for in research?
The fields where it stands highest, over all time, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.
| Field | World rank | Where that sits | Top-10% rate | Works |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EngineeringField | #5,137 of 11,412 | 0.5% | 448 | |
| Physical SciencesDomain | #15,053 of 21,541 | 0.3% | 880 | |
| Computer ScienceField | #6,006 of 7,020 | 0.2% | 217 | |
| Social SciencesDomain | #16,135 of 16,945 | 0.2% | 500 | |
| Social SciencesField | #9,936 of 10,206 | 0.1% | 253 | |
| Control and Systems EngineeringSubfield | #2,015 of 2,019 | 0.2% | 137 |
Each strip is that field’s whole ranked pool, with the notch where Women’s Environmental Institute sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no world mark, because the world rate differs by field (from about 6% to 21% in this record).
Field profile
Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.
Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Economics, Econometrics and Finance, 3.8×. Every wedge is a field page.
Who are the top researchers at Women’s Environmental Institute?
Ranked on the composite score, Wang Xiao lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Women’s Environmental Institute.
- 1 Wang Xiao United States · #680,227 worldwide 5 citations · 23 works
Which keywords describe research at Women’s Environmental Institute?
By fractional works in all years, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: China, Artificial Intelligence, Neural Network, Nationalism, Internet of Things, Religion, Philosophy and History.
- Simulation Technology
- Wavelet Analysis
- Fuzzy Logic
- Multi-Agent Systems
- Data Integration
- Virtual Reality Technology
- Control System
- Virtual Prototyping
- Power System
- Modeling
- Virtual Reality
- Remote Sensing
- Optimization
- Cloud Computing
- Christianity
- Regulation
- Internet of Things
- History
- Machine Learning
- Artificial Intelligence
- China
- Globalization
- Neural Network
- Nationalism
- Religion
- Philosophy
- Confucianism
- Fault Diagnosis
- Fuzzy Control
- Economic Development
- Knowledge Management
- Data Mining
- Smart Grid
- Wireless Sensor Networks
- Simulation
- Control Systems
- Coal Seam
- Multimedia Technology
- Language Education
- Hydraulic System Modeling
Size is fractional works in all years in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.
All 40 words, with their numbers
- China88▲ 30×5 topics
- Artificial Intelligence87▲ 6.6×21 topics
- Globalization82▲ 2.8×38 topics
- Machine Learning77▲ 2.2×30 topics
- Neural Network75▲ 17×5 topics
- History73▲ 5.7×6 topics
- Nationalism72▲ 7.9×7 topics
- Internet of Things72▲ 8.4×13 topics
- Religion67▲ 7.2×8 topics
- Regulation67▲ 6.9×8 topics
- Philosophy63▲ 8.8×6 topics
- Christianity60▲ 33×1 topic
- Confucianism60▲ 40×1 topic
- Cloud Computing59▲ 14×9 topics
- Fault Diagnosis58▲ 16×7 topics
- Optimization56▲ 6.4×17 topics
- Fuzzy Control55▲ 22×3 topics
- Remote Sensing53▲ 3.0×16 topics
- Economic Development51▲ 4.7×16 topics
- Virtual Reality45▲ 7.8×6 topics
- Knowledge Management45▲ 6.2×14 topics
- Modeling44▲ 11×6 topics
- Data Mining43▲ 6.0×8 topics
- Power System40▲ 22×3 topics
- Smart Grid40▲ 8.7×7 topics
- Virtual Prototyping40▲ 17×2 topics
- Wireless Sensor Networks39▲ 6.5×4 topics
- Control System37▲ 19×3 topics
- Simulation36▲ 6.9×8 topics
- Virtual Reality Technology36▲ 23×2 topics
- Control Systems35▲ 8.5×6 topics
- Data Integration34▲ 9.0×3 topics
- Coal Seam34▲ 34×2 topics
- Multi-Agent Systems33▲ 11×3 topics
- Multimedia Technology32▲ 31×2 topics
- Fuzzy Logic32▲ 9.4×5 topics
- Language Education32▲ 13×2 topics
- Wavelet Analysis31▲ 19×3 topics
- Hydraulic System Modeling31▲ 33×1 topic
- Simulation Technology31▲ 33×1 topic
Which research topics does Women’s Environmental Institute publish most on?
By volume in 2022–2025: Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production, Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management, Iron-based superconductors research and Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism.
Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.
- 1 Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production Building and Construction 1 works
- 2 Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management Internal Medicine 0 works
- 3 Iron-based superconductors research Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 0 works
- 4 Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism Condensed Matter Physics 0 works
- 5 Education and Digital Technologies Sociology and Political Science 0 works
- 6 Rare-earth and actinide compounds Condensed Matter Physics 0 works
- 7 Information Science and Libraries Information Systems 0 works
- 8 Academic Research in Diverse Fields Education 0 works
- 9 Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research Hematology 0 works
- 10 Insurance and Financial Risk Management Economics and Econometrics 0 works
How open and international is its research?
Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.
World: 28% of research is openly available.
World: 19% is written across borders.
How has Women’s Environmental Institute's research output changed?
Output in 2018–2022 was 65% lower than in 2013–2017.
The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.