Science Explorer Interactive view Map
Topic · Education

Ideological and Political Education

Ideological and Political Education is a research topic within Education. Science Explorer counts 42k research works in it since 1951. 2.0% of them reached the world's top 10% most cited for their field and year.

This cluster of papers focuses on the innovation and development of ideological and political education, particularly in the context of big data, artificial intelligence, wireless sensor networks, and deep learning. It explores topics such as network education, multimedia technology, and information systems for college students.

  • Ideological Education
  • Political Education
  • Big Data
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Wireless Sensor Networks
  • Deep Learning
  • Information Systems
  • College Students
  • Network Education
  • Multimedia Technology
Research works
42k
fractional, since 1951
In the world top 10%
829
per year above
Top-10% rate
2.0%
share of its works in the world top 10%
Growth, 2013–17 → 2018–22
-35%
the tick is no change

Which countries lead Ideological and Political Education research?

By volume, China and the United States publish the most (4.5k and 104 works in 2022–2025).

By volume, 2022–2025

  1. 1 China 4.5k works
  2. 2 United States 104 works
  3. 3 ?? 82 works
  4. 4 Philippines 67 works
  5. 5 Malaysia 67 works
  6. 6 Indonesia 52 works
  7. 7 India 47 works
  8. 8 Thailand 47 works
  9. 9 Russia 35 works
  10. 10 United Kingdom 33 works

How concentrated that is

The same countries as shares of everything the list above accounts for. A node where two countries do two thirds of the work and one spread evenly across twelve read alike as a ranking and not at all alike here.

China: 89.3%United States: 2.1%??: 1.6%Philippines: 1.3%6 others listed: 5.6%89%largest
China4,454 · 89.3%United States104 · 2.1%??82 · 1.6%Philippines67 · 1.3%6 others listed281 · 5.6%

Shares of the rows listed above, not of the whole node.

Which institutions lead Ideological and Political Education research?

By volume in 2022–2025, Anhui University of Finance and Economics publishes the most Ideological and Political Education research, followed by Taishan University and Sichuan University.

By volume, 2022–2025

  1. 1 Anhui University of Finance and EconomicsChina 56 works
  2. 2 Taishan UniversityChina 47 works
  3. 3 Sichuan UniversityChina 30 works
  4. 4 Sichuan University of Science and EngineeringChina 29 works
  5. 5 Zhaoqing UniversityChina 28 works
  6. 6 Zibo Vocational InstituteChina 26 works
  7. 7 Wenzhou PolytechnicChina 25 works
  8. 8 University of Electronic Science and Technology of ChinaChina 24 works
  9. 9 Shandong Institute of Commerce & TechnologyChina 23 works
  10. 10 University of Shanghai for Science and TechnologyChina 23 works

Where is Ideological and Political Education research done?

The largest centres of Ideological and Political Education research in 2022–2025 are Beijing (China), Xi'an (China), Guangzhou (China) and Chengdu (China). Among places with at least 20 works in it, it is an unusually large share of all research in Zhaoqing.

Largest cities, 2022–2025

  1. 1 Beijing China 315 works
  2. 2 Xi'an China 200 works
  3. 3 Guangzhou China 184 works
  4. 4 Chengdu China 177 works
  5. 5 Wuhan China 177 works
  6. 6 Jinan China 154 works
  7. 7 Shanghai China 142 works
  8. 8 Nanjing China 132 works
  9. 9 Chongqing China 127 works
  10. 10 Harbin China 95 works

Where it is the local speciality

  1. ZhaoqingCN · 28.1 works76×
← less than its size predicts1×more →

Location quotient: how much more of its research is in Ideological and Political Education than the world average.

See Ideological and Political Education on the map

Where is the best place to study Ideological and Political Education?

Among universities, judged by research, Beijing Polytechnic, Xi'an Peihua University and Xinyang Normal University score highest, combining excellence, specialisation, size, growth and international reach. Research strength is one signal when choosing where to study; it does not measure teaching.

0%20%40%mean 17.34%fractional works in this node (log) →share in the world top 10% →Beijing Polytechnic: 13, 24.5%Xi'an Peihua University: 10, 13.0%Xinyang Normal University: 8, 27.9%Shenzhen Polytechnic University: 19, 12.9%North China University of Science and Technology: 8, 29.0%Krirk University: 16, 10.3%Chengdu University of Information Technology: 9, 19.2%Anhui University of Finance and Economics: 56, 8.1%City University Malaysia: 9, 14.3%Zibo Vocational Institute: 26, 14.2%Xinyang Normal Unive…Beijing PolytechnicXi'an Peihua Univers…Shenzhen Polytechnic…
above the meannear itbelow it

One dot per university in the table below. The upper left is the interesting corner: small places doing unusually strong work.

#UniversityScoreTop 10%SpecialisationWorksGrowth
1 Beijing PolytechnicChina 62.324.5%65.9×13 +75.4%
2 Xi'an Peihua UniversityChina 58.813.0%129.7×10 +653.6%
3 Xinyang Normal UniversityChina 55.927.9%23.8×8 -85.4%
4 Shenzhen Polytechnic UniversityChina 55.712.9%38.4×19 -81.4%
5 North China University of Science and TechnologyChina 55.729.0%10.4×8 -78.7%
6 Krirk UniversityThailand 55.510.3%70.7×16 —
7 Chengdu University of Information TechnologyChina 54.119.2%13.3×9 —
8 Anhui University of Finance and EconomicsChina 54.08.1%81.1×56 -81.5%
9 City University MalaysiaMalaysia 52.214.3%45.1×9 —
10 Zibo Vocational InstituteChina 51.614.2%163.0×26 -77.8%

Universities only. Score blends excellence (30%), specialisation (25%), size (20%), growth (15%) and international reach (10%), 2015–2022; growth compares 2010–14 with 2015–19.

Is Ideological and Political Education research growing?

Output in 2018–2022 was 35% lower than in 2013–2017, peaking in 2011.

19801990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Which topics inside it are moving

Growth and decline on one axis around a shared zero. Two lists side by side hide the thing that matters: whether the growth dwarfs the decline, or the other way round.