Educational Leadership and Practices
Educational Leadership and Practices is a research topic within Education. Science Explorer counts 13k research works in it since 1950. 8.3% of them reached the world's top 10% most cited for their field and year.
This cluster of papers explores the evolution of educational leadership in diverse contexts, focusing on cultural diversity, learning environments, student achievement, organizational culture, teacher perspectives, school boards, leadership development, and the correlation between poverty and learning. It also discusses the formulation of alternative culture media for bacterial and fungal growth.
- Educational Leadership
- Cultural Diversity
- Learning Environment
- Student Achievement
- Organizational Culture
- Teacher Perspectives
- School Boards
- Leadership Development
- Poverty and Learning
- Alternative Culture Media
- Research works
- 13k fractional, since 1950
- In the world top 10%
- 1.1k per year above
- Top-10% rate
- 8.3% share of its works in the world top 10%
- Growth, 2013–17 → 2018–22
- -21% the tick is no change
Which countries lead Educational Leadership and Practices research?
By volume, the United States and the United Kingdom publish the most (543 and 119 works in 2022–2025).
By volume, 2022–2025
- 1 United States 543 works
- 2 United Kingdom 119 works
- 3 Canada 50 works
- 4 Japan 37 works
- 5 Australia 35 works
- 6 Germany 35 works
- 7 India 30 works
- 8 Italy 24 works
- 9 China 21 works
- 10 France 18 works
How concentrated that is
The same countries as shares of everything the list above accounts for. A node where two countries do two thirds of the work and one spread evenly across twelve read alike as a ranking and not at all alike here.
Shares of the rows listed above, not of the whole node.
Which institutions lead Educational Leadership and Practices research?
By volume in 2022–2025, University of Pittsburgh publishes the most Educational Leadership and Practices research, followed by The Nature Conservancy and Health Affairs.
By volume, 2022–2025
- 1 University of PittsburghUnited States 16 works
- 2 The Nature ConservancyUnited States 8 works
- 3 Health AffairsUnited States 7 works
- 4 Film IndependentUnited States 6 works
- 5 University of TorontoCanada 6 works
- 6 Sapienza University of RomeItaly 5 works
- 7 Williams CollegeUnited States 5 works
- 8 University of British ColumbiaCanada 5 works
- 9 Cornell UniversityUnited States 5 works
- 10 Emory UniversityUnited States 5 works
Where is Educational Leadership and Practices research done?
The largest centres of Educational Leadership and Practices research in 2022–2025 are London (United Kingdom), New York (United States), Pittsburgh (United States) and Tokyo (Japan).
Largest cities, 2022–2025
- 1 London United Kingdom 35 works
- 2 New York United States 22 works
- 3 Pittsburgh United States 17 works
- 4 Tokyo Japan 14 works
- 5 Los Angeles United States 14 works
- 6 Washington D.C. United States 13 works
- 7 Atlanta United States 12 works
- 8 Arlington United States 11 works
- 9 Philadelphia United States 10 works
- 10 Toronto Canada 10 works
Where is the best place to study Educational Leadership and Practices?
Among universities, judged by research, University of Pittsburgh score highest, combining excellence, specialisation, size, growth and international reach. Research strength is one signal when choosing where to study; it does not measure teaching.
| # | University | Score | Top 10% | Specialisation | Works | Growth |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | University of PittsburghUnited States | 30.0 | 0.0% | 20.1× | 16 | +71.5% |
Universities only. Score blends excellence (30%), specialisation (25%), size (20%), growth (15%) and international reach (10%), 2015–2022; growth compares 2010–14 with 2015–19.
Is Educational Leadership and Practices research growing?
Output in 2018–2022 was 21% lower than in 2013–2017, peaking in 2026. The fastest-growing topics are Educational Leadership and Practices.
The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Which topics inside it are moving
Growth and decline on one axis around a shared zero. Two lists side by side hide the thing that matters: whether the growth dwarfs the decline, or the other way round.